Message ID | 20231205100802.2705561-2-sai.pavan.boddu@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | versal-ospi fix | expand |
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 10:08, Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@amd.com> wrote: > > The OSPI DMA reads flash data through the OSPI linear address space (the > iomem_dac region), because of this the reentrancy guard introduced in > commit a2e1753b ("memory: prevent dma-reentracy issues") is disabled for > the memory region. > > Signed-off-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@amd.com> > --- > hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c b/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c > index 1a61679c2f..5123e7dde7 100644 > --- a/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c > +++ b/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c > @@ -1772,6 +1772,7 @@ static void xlnx_versal_ospi_init(Object *obj) > memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem_dac, obj, &ospi_dac_ops, s, > TYPE_XILINX_VERSAL_OSPI "-dac", 0x20000000); > sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->iomem_dac); > + s->iomem_dac.disable_reentrancy_guard = true; Where we set this flag we should have a comment explaining why we need to do it, please. PS: for a single patch you don't need to use a separate cover letter; cover letters are only needed for multi-patch series. thanks -- PMM
Hi Peter, >-----Original Message----- >From: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> >Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2023 10:12 PM >To: Boddu, Sai Pavan <sai.pavan.boddu@amd.com> >Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org; qemu-arm@nongnu.org; qemu- >block@nongnu.org; Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>; Edgar E. Iglesias ><edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>; Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>; Francisco >Iglesias <frasse.iglesias@gmail.com>; saipavanboddu@gmail.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] xlnx-versal-ospi: disable reentrancy detection for >iomem_dac > >On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 at 10:08, Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@amd.com> >wrote: >> >> The OSPI DMA reads flash data through the OSPI linear address space >> (the iomem_dac region), because of this the reentrancy guard >> introduced in commit a2e1753b ("memory: prevent dma-reentracy issues") >> is disabled for the memory region. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@amd.com> >> --- >> hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c b/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c >> index 1a61679c2f..5123e7dde7 100644 >> --- a/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c >> +++ b/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c >> @@ -1772,6 +1772,7 @@ static void xlnx_versal_ospi_init(Object *obj) >> memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem_dac, obj, &ospi_dac_ops, s, >> TYPE_XILINX_VERSAL_OSPI "-dac", 0x20000000); >> sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->iomem_dac); >> + s->iomem_dac.disable_reentrancy_guard = true; > >Where we set this flag we should have a comment explaining why we need to >do it, please. [Boddu, Sai Pavan] Sure, I will send a V2 on this. Regards, Sai pavan > >PS: for a single patch you don't need to use a separate cover letter; cover letters >are only needed for multi-patch series. > >thanks >-- PMM
diff --git a/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c b/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c index 1a61679c2f..5123e7dde7 100644 --- a/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c +++ b/hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c @@ -1772,6 +1772,7 @@ static void xlnx_versal_ospi_init(Object *obj) memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem_dac, obj, &ospi_dac_ops, s, TYPE_XILINX_VERSAL_OSPI "-dac", 0x20000000); sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->iomem_dac); + s->iomem_dac.disable_reentrancy_guard = true; sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->irq);
The OSPI DMA reads flash data through the OSPI linear address space (the iomem_dac region), because of this the reentrancy guard introduced in commit a2e1753b ("memory: prevent dma-reentracy issues") is disabled for the memory region. Signed-off-by: Sai Pavan Boddu <sai.pavan.boddu@amd.com> --- hw/ssi/xlnx-versal-ospi.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)