From patchwork Wed Jan 31 10:31:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Peter Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13539155 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17C72C4828D for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rV7tD-00067r-9x; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 05:32:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rV7tC-00067J-2N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 05:32:18 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rV7sy-0005fX-3v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 05:32:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1706697123; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=j8ffq9UlqLrAbGescpfzkK/SsU9D755Q4edLpGh6v/g=; b=J0KcXhFkc5ds3VPdSPDkvc9hvKimgz4fhaGxKWrhO2Gp+jWnX/jsoXhtRWnz8zr4vjKHxG 8AWLf7tC88V7/voaFE4dpmEv9PioF02CVYlPeHm/YO7yrcMTzQ5paEO87cdZrFk29FWtlE kVyOcItRWqwv/GFkl7bJfLrQYMolF5E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-477-HCwPEJUOOa-AXcTP4cJ5QQ-1; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 05:32:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: HCwPEJUOOa-AXcTP4cJ5QQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 927F83C1E9C2; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x1n.redhat.com (unknown [10.72.116.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AED81BDB1; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 10:31:56 +0000 (UTC) From: peterx@redhat.com To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Bryan Zhang , Prasad Pandit , Fabiano Rosas , peterx@redhat.com, Yuan Liu , Avihai Horon , Hao Xiang Subject: [PATCH 09/14] migration/multifd: Rename p->num_packets and clean it up Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 18:31:06 +0800 Message-ID: <20240131103111.306523-10-peterx@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240131103111.306523-1-peterx@redhat.com> References: <20240131103111.306523-1-peterx@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.5 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -33 X-Spam_score: -3.4 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.292, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Peter Xu This field, no matter whether on src or dest, is only used for debugging purpose. They can even be removed already, unless it still more or less provide some accounting on "how many packets are sent/recved for this thread". The other more important one is called packet_num, which is embeded in the multifd packet headers (MultiFDPacket_t). So let's keep them for now, but make them much easier to understand, by doing below: - Rename both of them to packets_sent / packets_recved, the old name (num_packets) are waaay too confusing when we already have MultiFDPacket_t.packets_num. - Avoid worrying on the "initial packet": we know we will send it, that's good enough. The accounting won't matter a great deal to start with 0 or with 1. - Move them to where we send/recv the packets. They're: - multifd_send_fill_packet() for senders. - multifd_recv_unfill_packet() for receivers. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas --- migration/multifd.h | 6 +++--- migration/multifd.c | 13 +++++-------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/multifd.h b/migration/multifd.h index 08f26ef3fe..2e4ad0dc56 100644 --- a/migration/multifd.h +++ b/migration/multifd.h @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ typedef struct { /* size of the next packet that contains pages */ uint32_t next_packet_size; /* packets sent through this channel */ - uint64_t num_packets; + uint64_t packets_sent; /* non zero pages sent through this channel */ uint64_t total_normal_pages; /* buffers to send */ @@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ typedef struct { MultiFDPacket_t *packet; /* size of the next packet that contains pages */ uint32_t next_packet_size; - /* packets sent through this channel */ - uint64_t num_packets; + /* packets received through this channel */ + uint64_t packets_recved; /* ramblock */ RAMBlock *block; /* ramblock host address */ diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c index 2d12de01a1..abc2746b6e 100644 --- a/migration/multifd.c +++ b/migration/multifd.c @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ static void multifd_send_fill_packet(MultiFDSendParams *p) packet->offset[i] = cpu_to_be64(temp); } + + p->packets_sent++; } static int multifd_recv_unfill_packet(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp) @@ -335,6 +337,7 @@ static int multifd_recv_unfill_packet(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp) p->next_packet_size = be32_to_cpu(packet->next_packet_size); p->packet_num = be64_to_cpu(packet->packet_num); + p->packets_recved++; if (p->normal_num == 0) { return 0; @@ -683,8 +686,6 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque) ret = -1; goto out; } - /* initial packet */ - p->num_packets = 1; while (true) { qemu_sem_post(&multifd_send_state->channels_ready); @@ -714,7 +715,6 @@ static void *multifd_send_thread(void *opaque) } multifd_send_fill_packet(p); - p->num_packets++; p->total_normal_pages += pages->num; trace_multifd_send(p->id, packet_num, pages->num, p->flags, p->next_packet_size); @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ out: rcu_unregister_thread(); migration_threads_remove(thread); - trace_multifd_send_thread_end(p->id, p->num_packets, p->total_normal_pages); + trace_multifd_send_thread_end(p->id, p->packets_sent, p->total_normal_pages); return NULL; } @@ -1120,7 +1120,6 @@ static void *multifd_recv_thread(void *opaque) p->flags &= ~MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC; trace_multifd_recv(p->id, p->packet_num, p->normal_num, flags, p->next_packet_size); - p->num_packets++; p->total_normal_pages += p->normal_num; qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex); @@ -1146,7 +1145,7 @@ static void *multifd_recv_thread(void *opaque) qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex); rcu_unregister_thread(); - trace_multifd_recv_thread_end(p->id, p->num_packets, p->total_normal_pages); + trace_multifd_recv_thread_end(p->id, p->packets_recved, p->total_normal_pages); return NULL; } @@ -1248,8 +1247,6 @@ void multifd_recv_new_channel(QIOChannel *ioc, Error **errp) } p->c = ioc; object_ref(OBJECT(ioc)); - /* initial packet */ - p->num_packets = 1; p->running = true; qemu_thread_create(&p->thread, p->name, multifd_recv_thread, p,