From patchwork Tue Feb 6 19:06:07 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefan Hajnoczi X-Patchwork-Id: 13547745 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96E1C4828D for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 19:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXQm5-0008Iw-M7; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:06:29 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXQm4-0008IR-BT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:06:28 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXQm2-0000fM-Tz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:06:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707246386; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=WHMeE1cx5qVWPE8IMyaGV8IfYtxBOS9Ntd4W17upN5Y=; b=DKr7hdUleWFitszh/rl0DZrvEUB7AbtLK8wGWVk+BMGbV9qN4DGo4SEsjBmImVM07gk3+5 ZzMUpstiCYlrcQD++RktfHelVrtbZruwR+3lf80vi7sIcIjRkgyLNIdDRrfWn9SN7tD3so RRBQ7O0KTVURBlRBS6H2slI9JMgaz2k= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-97-iUrt1BmMO6alqfTzoSqs2g-1; Tue, 06 Feb 2024 14:06:19 -0500 X-MC-Unique: iUrt1BmMO6alqfTzoSqs2g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0792038300B9; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 19:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.192.41]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D4DC07F51; Tue, 6 Feb 2024 19:06:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Michael Roth , Kevin Wolf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Markus Armbruster , Hanna Reitz , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Manos Pitsidianakis Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] virtio-blk: clarify that there is at least 1 virtqueue Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:06:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20240206190610.107963-3-stefanha@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240206190610.107963-1-stefanha@redhat.com> References: <20240206190610.107963-1-stefanha@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.8 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=stefanha@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.294, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org It is not possible to instantiate a virtio-blk device with 0 virtqueues. The following check is located in ->realize(): if (!conf->num_queues) { error_setg(errp, "num-queues property must be larger than 0"); return; } Later on we access s->vq_aio_context[0] under the assumption that there is as least one virtqueue. Hanna Czenczek noted that it would help to show that the array index is already valid. Add an assertion to document that s->vq_aio_context[0] is always safe...and catch future code changes that break this assumption. Suggested-by: Hanna Czenczek Reviewed-by: Manos Pitsidianakis Reviewed-by: Hanna Czenczek Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c index 6e3e3a23ee..e430ba583c 100644 --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c @@ -1824,6 +1824,7 @@ static int virtio_blk_start_ioeventfd(VirtIODevice *vdev) * Try to change the AioContext so that block jobs and other operations can * co-locate their activity in the same AioContext. If it fails, nevermind. */ + assert(nvqs > 0); /* enforced during ->realize() */ r = blk_set_aio_context(s->conf.conf.blk, s->vq_aio_context[0], &local_err); if (r < 0) {