From patchwork Wed Feb 21 13:08:15 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Id: 13565745 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1080C48BC3 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 15:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcoZ8-0007X9-Ld; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:31:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcoNX-0007qA-Jc; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 10:19:30 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rcmLx-0004rK-Pb; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 08:09:40 -0500 Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.174]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TfxRs5bJrzLqBy; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:08:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.221.188.139]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC7E1404DB; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:09:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.55) by kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 21:09:33 +0800 To: , , , , , , CC: Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 14/22] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64() Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 13:08:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20240221130823.677762-15-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240221130823.677762-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20240221130823.677762-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To kwepemi500008.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.139) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.188; envelope-from=ruanjinjie@huawei.com; helo=szxga02-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-to: Jinjie Ruan X-Patchwork-Original-From: Jinjie Ruan via From: Jinjie Ruan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org The NMI exception trap entry behave like IRQ or FIQ which depends on the NMI interrupt type. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan --- target/arm/helper.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 952ea7c02a..ac5f998e32 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -11466,6 +11466,13 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs) case EXCP_VFIQ: addr += 0x100; break; + case EXCP_NMI: + if (env->nmi_is_irq) { + addr += 0x80; + } else { + addr += 0x100; + } + break; case EXCP_VSERR: addr += 0x180; /* Construct the SError syndrome from IDS and ISS fields. */