@@ -7063,7 +7063,7 @@ static void ppc_cpu_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
}
name = cpu_model_from_type(typename);
- qemu_printf("PowerPC %-16s PVR %08x\n", name, pcc->pvr);
+ qemu_printf(" %-16s PVR %08x\n", name, pcc->pvr);
for (i = 0; ppc_cpu_aliases[i].alias != NULL; i++) {
PowerPCCPUAlias *alias = &ppc_cpu_aliases[i];
ObjectClass *alias_oc = ppc_cpu_class_by_name(alias->model);
@@ -7076,10 +7076,10 @@ static void ppc_cpu_list_entry(gpointer data, gpointer user_data)
* avoid printing the wrong alias here and use "preferred" instead
*/
if (strcmp(alias->alias, family->desc) == 0) {
- qemu_printf("PowerPC %-16s (alias for preferred %s CPU)\n",
+ qemu_printf(" %-16s (alias for preferred %s CPU)\n",
alias->alias, family->desc);
} else {
- qemu_printf("PowerPC %-16s (alias for %s)\n",
+ qemu_printf(" %-16s (alias for %s)\n",
alias->alias, name);
}
}
@@ -7090,6 +7090,7 @@ void ppc_cpu_list(void)
{
GSList *list;
+ qemu_printf("Available CPUs:\n");
list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_POWERPC_CPU, false);
list = g_slist_sort(list, ppc_cpu_list_compare);
g_slist_foreach(list, ppc_cpu_list_entry, NULL);
@@ -7097,7 +7098,7 @@ void ppc_cpu_list(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM
qemu_printf("\n");
- qemu_printf("PowerPC %s\n", "host");
+ qemu_printf(" %s\n", "host");
#endif
}
Printing a "PowerPC" in front of each CPU name is not helpful at all: It is confusing for the users since they don't know whether they have to specify these letters for the "-cpu" parameter, too, and it also takes some precious space in the dense output of the CPU entries. Let's simply remove this now and use two spaces at the beginning of the lines for the indentation of the entries instead, and add a "Available CPUs" in the very first line, like most other target architectures are doing it for their CPU help output already. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> --- target/ppc/cpu_init.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)