From patchwork Tue Apr 23 15:09:48 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Paolo Bonzini X-Patchwork-Id: 13640230 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7BBC4345F for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:12:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzHna-0006uw-Af; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:11:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzHnO-0005k4-OG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:10:58 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzHnM-0000O5-Ro for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:10:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1713885056; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MOg9KtNLxd3u1DXDqJr03F3rYuVq7N0n2StxlG1HCJo=; b=YQY/P44Bby+ClQsLSoXyObDIGdjqxGwKbrIcXiHEUCyvBLw1q/iLk5IjtvlTUejv5Q5/5e rDGrxISYiOKt21EFoSXjmuuyfhVL/iBF1oON6NsSrMRuuLEpuCwMOGhYXknwk3n4x/Xtpe mHUZyEvDpG/zKL2t0VXc+m6vmvySt90= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-68-QaltHlzIO9W27Wk5eGIt8g-1; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:10:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: QaltHlzIO9W27Wk5eGIt8g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E86E981F317; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avogadro.lan (unknown [10.39.192.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37152026D0A; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 15:10:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Bonzini To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Zhao Liu Subject: [PULL 60/63] target/i386/cpu: Merge the warning and error messages for AMD HT check Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 17:09:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20240423150951.41600-61-pbonzini@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240423150951.41600-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> References: <20240423150951.41600-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.4 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.67, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Zhao Liu Currently, the difference between warn_report_once() and error_report_once() is the former has the "warning:" prefix, while the latter does not have a similar level prefix. At the meantime, considering that there is no error handling logic here, and the purpose of error_report_once() is only to prompt the user with an abnormal message, there is no need to use an error-level message here, and instead we can just use a warning. Therefore, downgrade the message in error_report_once() to warning, and merge it into the previous warn_report_once(). Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Message-ID: <20240327103951.3853425-4-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- target/i386/cpu.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c index 28452983786..fd6af0d7632 100644 --- a/target/i386/cpu.c +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c @@ -7611,9 +7611,9 @@ static void x86_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) !(env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] & CPUID_EXT3_TOPOEXT) && cs->nr_threads > 1) { warn_report_once("This family of AMD CPU doesn't support " - "hyperthreading(%d).", cs->nr_threads); - error_report_once("Please configure -smp options properly" - " or try enabling topoext feature."); + "hyperthreading(%d). Please configure -smp " + "options properly or try enabling topoext " + "feature.", cs->nr_threads); } #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY