From patchwork Wed Apr 24 15:49:25 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 13642100 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D5AC41513 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 15:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzegh-00071r-Qs; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:37:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzegg-0006oF-HK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:37:34 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.13]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rzege-0005ia-Ht for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:37:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1713973052; x=1745509052; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2cHMC5a5BJRlD/PsC4aspwTroLUP40TmuAMHURKso6g=; b=Y/BSbydgEIxZIuP/ahmEHTy3kHlOXLll6yX7DKainpmhK2jjvkRi7Q/k b6pMpaQYkj2eTiLAGdStyFw2xTgnFsx5ghbY5ZTe758EwKYbrY7m3BWWd X6ZKXQ++dXxwt15lwsAfvLclYUrumxUyl0JC/HfQt+O5X/7Ur8ndMukmk qCUtO/7i/DziCzLlqRXOOQNiZta26D4y1ukiMX5wjgky86w6qxzRiUvwA zlX1TjqbwZTiOchI0XImPCoZ+d5GTpkQqoFsdInDl58Nn7QUBL1750a85 Ywh6YOXzN7Rf+E2QPgH8wDVKjxKi1hBq5nEGzS8ild5O3zP1F0auLZ60Y Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: k26jjP0VQcuj4OQ/7oOyZQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: TLRVZwm6TEK8NofAfkq/FA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11054"; a="12545813" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,226,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="12545813" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2024 08:37:20 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: cJsLI/nlRLaWYSQKo5QbtQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: GGRoCTakS4inJxEXIpq/RQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,226,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="25363333" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Apr 2024 08:37:16 -0700 From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-D?= =?utf-8?q?aud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini , Eric Blake , Markus Armbruster , Marcelo Tosatti , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P_=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Zhenyu Wang , Zhuocheng Ding , Babu Moger , Xiaoyao Li , Dapeng Mi , Yongwei Ma , Zhao Liu Subject: [PATCH v11 17/21] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 23:49:25 +0800 Message-Id: <20240424154929.1487382-18-zhao1.liu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240424154929.1487382-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> References: <20240424154929.1487382-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=192.198.163.13; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -50 X-Spam_score: -5.1 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.668, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Zhuocheng Ding After i386 supports module level, it's time to add the test for module level's parsing. Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding Co-developed-by: Zhao Liu Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang Tested-by: Babu Moger Tested-by: Yongwei Ma Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin --- tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c index f21b8a5d95c2..55b731ccae55 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1}; @@ -74,13 +75,22 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 33, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 6); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 7, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 8, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3); + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 9, 30, 2}; + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 4); + + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 1); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); - topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 1, 30, 2}; + topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 6, 30, 2}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); /* build a weird topology and see if IDs are calculated correctly @@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void) topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 6, 3}; g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 2); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_offset(&topo_info), ==, 2); + g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5); g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5);