From patchwork Wed May 29 06:19:23 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 13677894 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E1C3C25B75 for ; Wed, 29 May 2024 06:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCCQB-0005Zd-FC; Wed, 29 May 2024 02:04:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCCQA-0005ZS-Lv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 02:04:22 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([198.175.65.20]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCCQ8-0002tk-OU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 May 2024 02:04:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1716962661; x=1748498661; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RFSrIIphD9gfWDiAZ48qCDzXHovswwaxl9K4x9p8XKs=; b=muGaeLtU1Pgx4kM6S7cVh7G7Bud1QntEQEbi3kQIYWgmcQQQEMWN2dLX BUhhIPHqgkHbjrIL0GScA1n/YS5zaOH4TamxkkUXDPxSOf3qYv8Qo8JxD FDNahK+WKLYLD1VQ99YBYdzRHwmYzKpCqzSbQogAoMQMJYDYuro6fb4gC XdyPsOxDF7LdMO5JnxlQJjUlZ/bFxqQrNsJeZRc7Ti0TFdEShZf+t0h2j /SDaLt8qRVkd46vaFd9RUGPNpTTmvm0SQAB+9Kk0etupvlWMd4W04dOD3 j0v3omOzzYNLfqL5J30ZR4jqLMxtTdqXGnP7AglKNtcNHR6p5DOsfhJNZ A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: mSyTAIewQgKtyVQ80FyvnQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Ll80nNUQTDqyJ+Hvqg0Ejg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11085"; a="13187501" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,197,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="13187501" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 May 2024 23:04:20 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zbA52bhITPOu4aptMjHG0w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: v76N4ltZRJ6tfe71P5sUUg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,197,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="40144756" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 May 2024 23:04:18 -0700 From: Zhao Liu To: Eduardo Habkost , Marcel Apfelbaum , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-D?= =?utf-8?q?aud=C3=A9?= , Yanan Wang , Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Yongwei Ma , Zhao Liu Subject: [PATCH 6/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "modules" parameter in -smp Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 14:19:23 +0800 Message-Id: <20240529061925.350323-7-zhao1.liu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240529061925.350323-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> References: <20240529061925.350323-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=198.175.65.20; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.034, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Cover the module cases in test-smp-parse. Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu --- tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c index 2214e47ba9c0..01832e5eda32 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c @@ -48,17 +48,19 @@ } /* - * Currently a 4-level topology hierarchy is supported on PC machines - * -sockets/dies/cores/threads + * Currently a 5-level topology hierarchy is supported on PC machines + * -sockets/dies/modules/cores/threads */ -#define SMP_CONFIG_WITH_DIES(ha, a, hb, b, hc, c, hd, d, he, e, hf, f) \ +#define SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(ha, a, hb, b, hc, c, hd, d, \ + he, e, hf, f, hg, g) \ { \ .has_cpus = ha, .cpus = a, \ .has_sockets = hb, .sockets = b, \ .has_dies = hc, .dies = c, \ - .has_cores = hd, .cores = d, \ - .has_threads = he, .threads = e, \ - .has_maxcpus = hf, .maxcpus = f, \ + .has_modules = hd, .modules = d, \ + .has_cores = he, .cores = e, \ + .has_threads = hf, .threads = f, \ + .has_maxcpus = hg, .maxcpus = g, \ } /* @@ -345,8 +347,14 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_valid[] = { static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_invalid[] = { { + /* config: -smp 2,modules=2 */ + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 2, F, 0, F, 0, T, 2, + F, 0, F, 0, F, 0), + .expect_error = "modules > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology", + }, { /* config: -smp 2,dies=2 */ - .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_DIES(T, 2, F, 0, T, 2, F, 0, F, 0, F, 0), + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 2, F, 0, T, 2, F, 0, + F, 0, F, 0, F, 0), .expect_error = "dies > 1 not supported by this machine's CPU topology", }, { /* config: -smp 2,clusters=2 */ @@ -397,17 +405,39 @@ static const struct SMPTestData data_generic_invalid[] = { }, }; +static const struct SMPTestData data_with_modules_invalid[] = { + { + /* config: -smp 16,sockets=2,modules=2,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=16 */ + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 16, T, 2, F, 0, T, 2, + T, 4, T, 2, T, 16), + .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: " + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " + "sockets (2) * modules (2) * cores (4) * threads (2) " + "!= maxcpus (16)", + }, { + /* config: -smp 34,sockets=2,modules=2,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=32 */ + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 34, T, 2, F, 0, T, 2, + T, 4, T, 2, T, 32), + .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: " + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " + "sockets (2) * modules (2) * cores (4) * threads (2) " + "== maxcpus (32) < smp_cpus (34)", + }, +}; + static const struct SMPTestData data_with_dies_invalid[] = { { /* config: -smp 16,sockets=2,dies=2,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=16 */ - .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_DIES(T, 16, T, 2, T, 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 16), + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 16, T, 2, T, 2, F, 0, + T, 4, T, 2, T, 16), .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: " "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " "sockets (2) * dies (2) * cores (4) * threads (2) " "!= maxcpus (16)", }, { /* config: -smp 34,sockets=2,dies=2,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=32 */ - .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_DIES(T, 34, T, 2, T, 2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 32), + .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 34, T, 2, T, 2, F, 0, + T, 4, T, 2, T, 32), .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: " "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " "sockets (2) * dies (2) * cores (4) * threads (2) " @@ -861,6 +891,13 @@ static void machine_generic_invalid_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) mc->max_cpus = MAX_CPUS - 1; } +static void machine_with_modules_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) +{ + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc); + + mc->smp_props.modules_supported = true; +} + static void machine_with_dies_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) { MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc); @@ -945,6 +982,56 @@ static void test_generic_invalid(const void *opaque) object_unref(obj); } +static void test_with_modules(const void *opaque) +{ + const char *machine_type = opaque; + Object *obj = object_new(machine_type); + MachineState *ms = MACHINE(obj); + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(obj); + SMPTestData data = {}; + unsigned int num_modules = 2; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data_generic_valid); i++) { + data = data_generic_valid[i]; + unsupported_params_init(mc, &data); + + /* when modules parameter is omitted, it will be set as 1 */ + data.expect_prefer_sockets.modules = 1; + data.expect_prefer_cores.modules = 1; + + smp_parse_test(ms, &data, true); + + /* when modules parameter is specified */ + data.config.has_modules = true; + data.config.modules = num_modules; + if (data.config.has_cpus) { + data.config.cpus *= num_modules; + } + if (data.config.has_maxcpus) { + data.config.maxcpus *= num_modules; + } + + data.expect_prefer_sockets.modules = num_modules; + data.expect_prefer_sockets.cpus *= num_modules; + data.expect_prefer_sockets.max_cpus *= num_modules; + data.expect_prefer_cores.modules = num_modules; + data.expect_prefer_cores.cpus *= num_modules; + data.expect_prefer_cores.max_cpus *= num_modules; + + smp_parse_test(ms, &data, true); + } + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data_with_modules_invalid); i++) { + data = data_with_modules_invalid[i]; + unsupported_params_init(mc, &data); + + smp_parse_test(ms, &data, false); + } + + object_unref(obj); +} + static void test_with_dies(const void *opaque) { const char *machine_type = opaque; @@ -1303,6 +1390,10 @@ static const TypeInfo smp_machine_types[] = { .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-generic-invalid"), .parent = TYPE_MACHINE, .class_init = machine_generic_invalid_class_init, + }, { + .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-modules"), + .parent = TYPE_MACHINE, + .class_init = machine_with_modules_class_init, }, { .name = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-dies"), .parent = TYPE_MACHINE, @@ -1344,6 +1435,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/generic/invalid", MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-generic-invalid"), test_generic_invalid); + g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_modules", + MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-modules"), + test_with_modules); g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_dies", MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-dies"), test_with_dies);