[7/8] tests/unit/test-smp-parse: Test "modules" and "dies" combination case

Commit Message

Zhao Liu May 29, 2024, 6:19 a.m. UTC

Since i386 PC machine supports both "modules" and "dies" in -smp, add the
"modules" and "dies" combination test case to match the actual topology
usage scenario.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <[e-mail]>
---
 tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)

Patch

diff --git a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
index 01832e5eda32..2ca8530e935e 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-smp-parse.c
@@ -445,6 +445,33 @@  static const struct SMPTestData data_with_dies_invalid[] = {
     },
 };
 
+static const struct SMPTestData data_with_modules_dies_invalid[] = {
+    {
+        /*
+         * config: -smp 200,sockets=3,dies=5,modules=2,cores=4,\
+         * threads=2,maxcpus=200
+         */
+        .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 200, T, 3, T, 5, T,
+                                            2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 200),
+        .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: "
+                        "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: "
+                        "sockets (3) * dies (5) * modules (2) * "
+                        "cores (4) * threads (2) != maxcpus (200)",
+    }, {
+        /*
+         * config: -smp 242,sockets=3,dies=5,modules=2,cores=4,\
+         * threads=2,maxcpus=240
+         */
+        .config = SMP_CONFIG_WITH_MODS_DIES(T, 242, T, 3, T, 5, T,
+                                            2, T, 4, T, 2, T, 240),
+        .expect_error = "Invalid CPU topology: "
+                        "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: "
+                        "sockets (3) * dies (5) * modules (2) * "
+                        "cores (4) * threads (2) "
+                        "== maxcpus (240) < smp_cpus (242)",
+    },
+};
+
 static const struct SMPTestData data_with_clusters_invalid[] = {
     {
         /* config: -smp 16,sockets=2,clusters=2,cores=4,threads=2,maxcpus=16 */
@@ -905,6 +932,14 @@  static void machine_with_dies_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     mc->smp_props.dies_supported = true;
 }
 
+static void machine_with_modules_dies_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
+{
+    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
+
+    mc->smp_props.modules_supported = true;
+    mc->smp_props.dies_supported = true;
+}
+
 static void machine_with_clusters_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
 {
     MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
@@ -1082,6 +1117,67 @@  static void test_with_dies(const void *opaque)
     object_unref(obj);
 }
 
+static void test_with_modules_dies(const void *opaque)
+{
+    const char *machine_type = opaque;
+    Object *obj = object_new(machine_type);
+    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(obj);
+    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(obj);
+    SMPTestData data = {};
+    unsigned int num_modules = 5, num_dies = 3;
+    int i;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data_generic_valid); i++) {
+        data = data_generic_valid[i];
+        unsupported_params_init(mc, &data);
+
+        /*
+         * when modules and dies parameters are omitted, they will
+         * be both set as 1.
+         */
+        data.expect_prefer_sockets.modules = 1;
+        data.expect_prefer_sockets.dies = 1;
+        data.expect_prefer_cores.modules = 1;
+        data.expect_prefer_cores.dies = 1;
+
+        smp_parse_test(ms, &data, true);
+
+        /* when modules and dies parameters are both specified */
+        data.config.has_modules = true;
+        data.config.modules = num_modules;
+        data.config.has_dies = true;
+        data.config.dies = num_dies;
+
+        if (data.config.has_cpus) {
+            data.config.cpus *= num_modules * num_dies;
+        }
+        if (data.config.has_maxcpus) {
+            data.config.maxcpus *= num_modules * num_dies;
+        }
+
+        data.expect_prefer_sockets.modules = num_modules;
+        data.expect_prefer_sockets.dies = num_dies;
+        data.expect_prefer_sockets.cpus *= num_modules * num_dies;
+        data.expect_prefer_sockets.max_cpus *= num_modules * num_dies;
+
+        data.expect_prefer_cores.modules = num_modules;
+        data.expect_prefer_cores.dies = num_dies;
+        data.expect_prefer_cores.cpus *= num_modules * num_dies;
+        data.expect_prefer_cores.max_cpus *= num_modules * num_dies;
+
+        smp_parse_test(ms, &data, true);
+    }
+
+    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data_with_modules_dies_invalid); i++) {
+        data = data_with_modules_dies_invalid[i];
+        unsupported_params_init(mc, &data);
+
+        smp_parse_test(ms, &data, false);
+    }
+
+    object_unref(obj);
+}
+
 static void test_with_clusters(const void *opaque)
 {
     const char *machine_type = opaque;
@@ -1398,6 +1494,10 @@  static const TypeInfo smp_machine_types[] = {
         .name           = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-dies"),
         .parent         = TYPE_MACHINE,
         .class_init     = machine_with_dies_class_init,
+    }, {
+        .name           = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-modules-dies"),
+        .parent         = TYPE_MACHINE,
+        .class_init     = machine_with_modules_dies_class_init,
     }, {
         .name           = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-clusters"),
         .parent         = TYPE_MACHINE,
@@ -1441,6 +1541,9 @@  int main(int argc, char *argv[])
     g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_dies",
                          MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-dies"),
                          test_with_dies);
+    g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_modules_dies",
+                         MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-modules-dies"),
+                         test_with_modules_dies);
     g_test_add_data_func("/test-smp-parse/with_clusters",
                          MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("smp-with-clusters"),
                          test_with_clusters);