From patchwork Thu Jun 6 12:16:57 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Aditya Gupta X-Patchwork-Id: 13688401 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88A12C25B75 for ; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFC3c-0008EB-QA; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:17:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFC3a-0008C3-5K; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:17:26 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFC3Y-0006EK-Aw; Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:17:25 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 456CCSZQ024749; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:17:20 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : date : from : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : references : subject : to; s=pp1; bh=h6VHakey/41eoMID9x1GF+gfi2vVsl+KAyfGGnlm/fw=; b=iIXwP883VigMmLr//zRMcK/0fXFV9111DucnE5563TWgN/pZMMmsN6lJZe4rUq0TdzgT WgJaCCBQ72aQ4+kLtYldleKIG2FPsUvq66eQJF/eXTmPMN7V9hqZvOgWdYIW+zZi1C7q S0Fq35nWzbWeJI1pMXi+JdxYF79X9hch+nKjX77HDAwTVqXPMWqJP9YAJmSr/dVRMh4r UCB0VNfaRhC0Dk6prgpEpL8HRGRUGLtJvGlEewyqDxG64MOuNihfWZHUzjOjpYf9NnBu IFMu8XkfWS/ULFfS3DWhQEgF8zpnvZ9YVb2unr/w6tVkIxJ+odFpnhN1YyD1PoZRfntz wg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ykcwj00ec-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Jun 2024 12:17:20 +0000 Received: from m0353728.ppops.net (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 456CHJ88001258; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:17:19 GMT Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ykcwj00ea-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Jun 2024 12:17:19 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 456CA6pB008517; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:17:18 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.227]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3ygec12n63-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Jun 2024 12:17:18 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay01.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 456CHCxP52035908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:17:14 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8772A2004B; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:17:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3FE20040; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:17:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-3c92a0cc-27cf-11b2-a85c-b804d9ca68fa.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.109.199.72]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 6 Jun 2024 12:17:10 +0000 (GMT) From: Aditya Gupta To: Mahesh J Salgaonkar , Madhavan Srinivasan , Nicholas Piggin , =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= , Harsh Prateek Bora Cc: , , Daniel Henrique Barboza Subject: [PATCH v5 5/5] target/ppc: Fix regression due to Power10 and Power11 having same PCR Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 17:46:57 +0530 Message-ID: <20240606121657.254308-6-adityag@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.1 In-Reply-To: <20240606121657.254308-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240606121657.254308-1-adityag@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: AjQWrj9Rpqfj1Avuo6WORNhxMb2v9vvy X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: MU3k9KJD9dIb87hgU2Mkt8djb_OU3NQw X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1039,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.28.16 definitions=2024-06-06_01,2024-06-06_02,2024-05-17_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=884 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2405010000 definitions=main-2406060090 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=adityag@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Power11 has the same PCR (Processor Compatibility Register) value, as Power10. Due to this, QEMU considers Power11 as a valid compat-mode for Power10, ie. earlier it was possible to run QEMU with '-M pseries,max-compat-mode=power11 --cpu power10' Same PCR also introduced a regression where `-M pseries --cpu power10` boots as Power11 (ie. logical PVR is of Power11, even though PVR is Power10). The regression was due to 'do_client_architecture_support' checking for valid compat modes and finding Power11 to be a valid compat mode for Power10 (it happens even without passing 'max-compat-mode' explicitly). Fix compat-mode issue and regression, by ensuring a future Power processor (with a higher logical_pvr value, eg. P11) cannot be valid compat-mode for an older Power processor (eg. P10) Cc: Cédric Le Goater Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza Cc: Harsh Prateek Bora Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan Cc: Nicholas Piggin Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin --- target/ppc/compat.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/ppc/compat.c b/target/ppc/compat.c index 12dd8ae290ca..168a3c06316f 100644 --- a/target/ppc/compat.c +++ b/target/ppc/compat.c @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ static bool pcc_compat(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t compat_pvr, /* Outside specified range */ return false; } + if (compat->pvr > pcc->logical_pvr) { + /* Older CPU cannot support a newer processor's compat mode */ + return false; + } if (!(pcc->pcr_supported & compat->pcr_level)) { /* Not supported by this CPU */ return false;