From patchwork Tue Jul 2 08:00:40 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= X-Patchwork-Id: 13719090 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0DEC3064D for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:03:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOYRy-0006PI-VZ; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 04:01:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOYRl-0006LM-QQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 04:01:05 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sOYRk-00062d-50 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 04:01:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1719907263; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dvLCFMy9DiYxmZbtVAEmVqyO0aut3yGWie2WrB5x09s=; b=XPMiQTcsaz1XxYWzUXjkONyql0ebyTMbjwyaR09ll5tF53OXsHRfWbej3jm9kus/KvdaLt lEfC7rVu8uD1NP06oMbFgnhy5BcyQTeSFUNNA9oQk4B0rc9IRNXSbE2JxGHyRs+cIkFDsE 3LlsaW/vYHbIoDhmTalvk6aPYkWdgzA= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-120-cz9jK8ygOWCdq3faVNt9xA-1; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 04:01:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: cz9jK8ygOWCdq3faVNt9xA-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40A3519560AF; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from corto.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.90]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B73619560AA; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 08:00:57 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= To: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Jamin Lin , =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= Subject: [PULL 4/6] aspeed/soc: Fix possible divide by zero Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 10:00:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20240702080042.464220-5-clg@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240702080042.464220-1-clg@redhat.com> References: <20240702080042.464220-1-clg@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=clg@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Jamin Lin Coverity reports a possible DIVIDE_BY_ZERO issue regarding the "ram_size" object property. This can not happen because RAM has predefined valid sizes per SoC. Nevertheless, add a test to close the issue. Fixes: Coverity CID 1547113 Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater [ clg: Rewrote commit log ] Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater --- hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c index b6876b4862ff..18e6a8b10cae 100644 --- a/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed_ast27x0.c @@ -211,6 +211,8 @@ static void aspeed_ram_capacity_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t data, ram_size = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(&s->sdmc), "ram-size", &error_abort); + assert(ram_size > 0); + /* * Emulate ddr capacity hardware behavior. * If writes the data to the address which is beyond the ram size,