@@ -1730,6 +1730,10 @@ static FeatureDep feature_dependencies[] = {
.from = { FEAT_7_1_EAX, CPUID_7_1_EAX_WRMSRNS },
.to = { FEAT_7_1_EAX, CPUID_7_1_EAX_FRED },
},
+ {
+ .from = { FEAT_7_0_EBX, CPUID_7_0_EBX_SGX },
+ .to = { FEAT_7_0_ECX, CPUID_7_0_ECX_SGX_LC },
+ },
};
typedef struct X86RegisterInfo32 {
@@ -6545,11 +6549,6 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
*ecx |= CPUID_7_0_ECX_OSPKE;
}
*edx = env->features[FEAT_7_0_EDX]; /* Feature flags */
-
- if ((*ecx & CPUID_7_0_ECX_SGX_LC)
- && (!(*ebx & CPUID_7_0_EBX_SGX))) {
- *ecx &= ~CPUID_7_0_ECX_SGX_LC;
- }
} else if (count == 1) {
*eax = env->features[FEAT_7_1_EAX];
*edx = env->features[FEAT_7_1_EDX];
At present, cpu_x86_cpuid() silently masks off SGX_LC if SGX is absent. This is not proper because the user is not told about the dependency between the two. So explicitly define the dependency between SGX_LC and SGX feature words, so that user could get a warning when SGX_LC is enabled but SGX is absent. Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> --- target/i386/cpu.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)