Message ID | 20240910045419.1252277-3-alistair.francis@wdc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | riscv: char: Avoid dropped charecters | expand |
On 10/9/24 06:54, Alistair Francis wrote: > The current approach of using qemu_chr_fe_write() and ignoring the > return values results in dropped characters [1]. > > Let's update the SiFive UART to use a async sifive_uart_xmit() function > to transmit the characters and apply back pressure to the guest with > the SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL status. > > This should avoid dropped characters and more realisticly model the > hardware. > > 1: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2114 > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> > Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h | 16 +++++- > hw/char/sifive_uart.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > +static void sifive_uart_write_tx_fifo(SiFiveUARTState *s, const uint8_t *buf, > + int size) > +{ > + uint64_t current_time = qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); > + > + if (size > fifo8_num_free(&s->tx_fifo)) { > + size = fifo8_num_free(&s->tx_fifo); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "sifive_uart: TX FIFO overflow"); > + } > + > + fifo8_push_all(&s->tx_fifo, buf, size); > + > + if (fifo8_is_full(&s->tx_fifo)) { > + s->txfifo |= SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL; > + } > + > + timer_mod(s->fifo_trigger_handle, current_time + 100); Preferably using a #define instead of this magic '100' value (no need to repost): Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > +}
On 10/09/2024 05:54, Alistair Francis wrote: > The current approach of using qemu_chr_fe_write() and ignoring the > return values results in dropped characters [1]. > > Let's update the SiFive UART to use a async sifive_uart_xmit() function > to transmit the characters and apply back pressure to the guest with > the SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL status. > > This should avoid dropped characters and more realisticly model the > hardware. Does the UART work reliably using the fifo8_*_bufptr() functions? One of the motivations for my recent Fifo8 series is that these functions don't handle the wraparound correctly, unlike the fifo8_*_buf() functions in my recent Fifo8 series which do. This was the cause of Phil's async issue in https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-07/msg05028.html. > 1: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2114 > > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com> > Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > --- > include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h | 16 +++++- > hw/char/sifive_uart.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h b/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h > index 7f6c79f8bd..0846cf6218 100644 > --- a/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h > +++ b/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #include "hw/qdev-properties.h" > #include "hw/sysbus.h" > #include "qom/object.h" > +#include "qemu/fifo8.h" > > enum { > SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO = 0, > @@ -48,9 +49,13 @@ enum { > SIFIVE_UART_IP_RXWM = 2 /* Receive watermark interrupt pending */ > }; > > +#define SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL 0x80000000 > + > #define SIFIVE_UART_GET_TXCNT(txctrl) ((txctrl >> 16) & 0x7) > #define SIFIVE_UART_GET_RXCNT(rxctrl) ((rxctrl >> 16) & 0x7) > + > #define SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE 8 > +#define SIFIVE_UART_TX_FIFO_SIZE 8 > > #define TYPE_SIFIVE_UART "riscv.sifive.uart" > OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(SiFiveUARTState, SIFIVE_UART) > @@ -63,13 +68,20 @@ struct SiFiveUARTState { > qemu_irq irq; > MemoryRegion mmio; > CharBackend chr; > - uint8_t rx_fifo[SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE]; > - uint8_t rx_fifo_len; > + > + uint32_t txfifo; > uint32_t ie; > uint32_t ip; > uint32_t txctrl; > uint32_t rxctrl; > uint32_t div; > + > + uint8_t rx_fifo[SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE]; > + uint8_t rx_fifo_len; > + > + Fifo8 tx_fifo; > + > + QEMUTimer *fifo_trigger_handle; > }; > > SiFiveUARTState *sifive_uart_create(MemoryRegion *address_space, hwaddr base, > diff --git a/hw/char/sifive_uart.c b/hw/char/sifive_uart.c > index 7fc6787f69..16a70c7ad7 100644 > --- a/hw/char/sifive_uart.c > +++ b/hw/char/sifive_uart.c > @@ -64,6 +64,71 @@ static void sifive_uart_update_irq(SiFiveUARTState *s) > } > } > > +static gboolean sifive_uart_xmit(void *do_not_use, GIOCondition cond, > + void *opaque) > +{ > + SiFiveUARTState *s = opaque; > + int ret; > + const uint8_t *characters; > + uint32_t numptr = 0; > + > + /* instant drain the fifo when there's no back-end */ > + if (!qemu_chr_fe_backend_connected(&s->chr)) { > + fifo8_reset(&s->tx_fifo); > + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; > + } > + > + if (fifo8_is_empty(&s->tx_fifo)) { > + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; > + } > + > + /* Don't pop the FIFO in case the write fails */ > + characters = fifo8_peek_bufptr(&s->tx_fifo, > + fifo8_num_used(&s->tx_fifo), &numptr); > + ret = qemu_chr_fe_write(&s->chr, characters, numptr); > + > + if (ret >= 0) { > + /* We wrote the data, actually pop the fifo */ > + fifo8_pop_bufptr(&s->tx_fifo, ret, NULL); > + } > + > + if (!fifo8_is_empty(&s->tx_fifo)) { > + guint r = qemu_chr_fe_add_watch(&s->chr, G_IO_OUT | G_IO_HUP, > + sifive_uart_xmit, s); > + if (!r) { > + fifo8_reset(&s->tx_fifo); > + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; > + } > + } > + > + /* Clear the TX Full bit */ > + if (!fifo8_is_full(&s->tx_fifo)) { > + s->txfifo &= ~SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL; > + } > + > + sifive_uart_update_irq(s); > + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; > +} > + > +static void sifive_uart_write_tx_fifo(SiFiveUARTState *s, const uint8_t *buf, > + int size) > +{ > + uint64_t current_time = qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); > + > + if (size > fifo8_num_free(&s->tx_fifo)) { > + size = fifo8_num_free(&s->tx_fifo); > + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "sifive_uart: TX FIFO overflow"); > + } > + > + fifo8_push_all(&s->tx_fifo, buf, size); > + > + if (fifo8_is_full(&s->tx_fifo)) { > + s->txfifo |= SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL; > + } > + > + timer_mod(s->fifo_trigger_handle, current_time + 100); > +} > + > static uint64_t > sifive_uart_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size) > { > @@ -82,7 +147,7 @@ sifive_uart_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size) > return 0x80000000; > > case SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO: > - return 0; /* Should check tx fifo */ > + return s->txfifo; > case SIFIVE_UART_IE: > return s->ie; > case SIFIVE_UART_IP: > @@ -106,12 +171,10 @@ sifive_uart_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > { > SiFiveUARTState *s = opaque; > uint32_t value = val64; > - unsigned char ch = value; > > switch (addr) { > case SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO: > - qemu_chr_fe_write(&s->chr, &ch, 1); > - sifive_uart_update_irq(s); > + sifive_uart_write_tx_fifo(s, (uint8_t *) &value, 1); > return; > case SIFIVE_UART_IE: > s->ie = val64; > @@ -131,6 +194,13 @@ sifive_uart_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > __func__, (int)addr, (int)value); > } > > +static void fifo_trigger_update(void *opaque) > +{ > + SiFiveUARTState *s = opaque; > + > + sifive_uart_xmit(NULL, G_IO_OUT, s); > +} > + > static const MemoryRegionOps sifive_uart_ops = { > .read = sifive_uart_read, > .write = sifive_uart_write, > @@ -197,6 +267,9 @@ static void sifive_uart_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > { > SiFiveUARTState *s = SIFIVE_UART(dev); > > + s->fifo_trigger_handle = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, > + fifo_trigger_update, s); > + > qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr, sifive_uart_can_rx, sifive_uart_rx, > sifive_uart_event, sifive_uart_be_change, s, > NULL, true); > @@ -206,12 +279,18 @@ static void sifive_uart_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > static void sifive_uart_reset_enter(Object *obj, ResetType type) > { > SiFiveUARTState *s = SIFIVE_UART(obj); > + > + s->txfifo = 0; > s->ie = 0; > s->ip = 0; > s->txctrl = 0; > s->rxctrl = 0; > s->div = 0; > + > s->rx_fifo_len = 0; > + > + memset(s->rx_fifo, 0, SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE); > + fifo8_create(&s->tx_fifo, SIFIVE_UART_TX_FIFO_SIZE); > } > > static void sifive_uart_reset_hold(Object *obj, ResetType type) > @@ -222,8 +301,8 @@ static void sifive_uart_reset_hold(Object *obj, ResetType type) > > static const VMStateDescription vmstate_sifive_uart = { > .name = TYPE_SIFIVE_UART, > - .version_id = 1, > - .minimum_version_id = 1, > + .version_id = 2, > + .minimum_version_id = 2, > .fields = (const VMStateField[]) { > VMSTATE_UINT8_ARRAY(rx_fifo, SiFiveUARTState, > SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE), > @@ -233,6 +312,9 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_sifive_uart = { > VMSTATE_UINT32(txctrl, SiFiveUARTState), > VMSTATE_UINT32(rxctrl, SiFiveUARTState), > VMSTATE_UINT32(div, SiFiveUARTState), > + VMSTATE_UINT32(txfifo, SiFiveUARTState), > + VMSTATE_FIFO8(tx_fifo, SiFiveUARTState), > + VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(fifo_trigger_handle, SiFiveUARTState), > VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST() > }, > }; ATB, Mark.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 6:35 AM Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk> wrote: > > On 10/09/2024 05:54, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > The current approach of using qemu_chr_fe_write() and ignoring the > > return values results in dropped characters [1]. > > > > Let's update the SiFive UART to use a async sifive_uart_xmit() function > > to transmit the characters and apply back pressure to the guest with > > the SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL status. > > > > This should avoid dropped characters and more realisticly model the > > hardware. > > Does the UART work reliably using the fifo8_*_bufptr() functions? One of the I haven't noticed any issues. > motivations for my recent Fifo8 series is that these functions don't handle the > wraparound correctly, unlike the fifo8_*_buf() functions in my recent Fifo8 series > which do. This was the cause of Phil's async issue in > https://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-07/msg05028.html. I'm not sure if it matters here characters = fifo8_peek_bufptr(&s->tx_fifo, fifo8_num_used(&s->tx_fifo), &numptr); ret = qemu_chr_fe_write(&s->chr, characters, numptr); if (ret >= 0) { /* We wrote the data, actually pop the fifo */ fifo8_pop_bufptr(&s->tx_fifo, ret, NULL); } I don't care how many characters are returned from fifo8_peek_bufptr(), I'll just write them and then pop that number with fifo8_pop_bufptr() If fifo8_is_empty() isn't empty I re-add the watcher for qemu_chr_fe_add_watch() Alistair
diff --git a/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h b/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h index 7f6c79f8bd..0846cf6218 100644 --- a/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h +++ b/include/hw/char/sifive_uart.h @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ #include "hw/qdev-properties.h" #include "hw/sysbus.h" #include "qom/object.h" +#include "qemu/fifo8.h" enum { SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO = 0, @@ -48,9 +49,13 @@ enum { SIFIVE_UART_IP_RXWM = 2 /* Receive watermark interrupt pending */ }; +#define SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL 0x80000000 + #define SIFIVE_UART_GET_TXCNT(txctrl) ((txctrl >> 16) & 0x7) #define SIFIVE_UART_GET_RXCNT(rxctrl) ((rxctrl >> 16) & 0x7) + #define SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE 8 +#define SIFIVE_UART_TX_FIFO_SIZE 8 #define TYPE_SIFIVE_UART "riscv.sifive.uart" OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(SiFiveUARTState, SIFIVE_UART) @@ -63,13 +68,20 @@ struct SiFiveUARTState { qemu_irq irq; MemoryRegion mmio; CharBackend chr; - uint8_t rx_fifo[SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE]; - uint8_t rx_fifo_len; + + uint32_t txfifo; uint32_t ie; uint32_t ip; uint32_t txctrl; uint32_t rxctrl; uint32_t div; + + uint8_t rx_fifo[SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE]; + uint8_t rx_fifo_len; + + Fifo8 tx_fifo; + + QEMUTimer *fifo_trigger_handle; }; SiFiveUARTState *sifive_uart_create(MemoryRegion *address_space, hwaddr base, diff --git a/hw/char/sifive_uart.c b/hw/char/sifive_uart.c index 7fc6787f69..16a70c7ad7 100644 --- a/hw/char/sifive_uart.c +++ b/hw/char/sifive_uart.c @@ -64,6 +64,71 @@ static void sifive_uart_update_irq(SiFiveUARTState *s) } } +static gboolean sifive_uart_xmit(void *do_not_use, GIOCondition cond, + void *opaque) +{ + SiFiveUARTState *s = opaque; + int ret; + const uint8_t *characters; + uint32_t numptr = 0; + + /* instant drain the fifo when there's no back-end */ + if (!qemu_chr_fe_backend_connected(&s->chr)) { + fifo8_reset(&s->tx_fifo); + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; + } + + if (fifo8_is_empty(&s->tx_fifo)) { + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; + } + + /* Don't pop the FIFO in case the write fails */ + characters = fifo8_peek_bufptr(&s->tx_fifo, + fifo8_num_used(&s->tx_fifo), &numptr); + ret = qemu_chr_fe_write(&s->chr, characters, numptr); + + if (ret >= 0) { + /* We wrote the data, actually pop the fifo */ + fifo8_pop_bufptr(&s->tx_fifo, ret, NULL); + } + + if (!fifo8_is_empty(&s->tx_fifo)) { + guint r = qemu_chr_fe_add_watch(&s->chr, G_IO_OUT | G_IO_HUP, + sifive_uart_xmit, s); + if (!r) { + fifo8_reset(&s->tx_fifo); + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; + } + } + + /* Clear the TX Full bit */ + if (!fifo8_is_full(&s->tx_fifo)) { + s->txfifo &= ~SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL; + } + + sifive_uart_update_irq(s); + return G_SOURCE_REMOVE; +} + +static void sifive_uart_write_tx_fifo(SiFiveUARTState *s, const uint8_t *buf, + int size) +{ + uint64_t current_time = qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL); + + if (size > fifo8_num_free(&s->tx_fifo)) { + size = fifo8_num_free(&s->tx_fifo); + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "sifive_uart: TX FIFO overflow"); + } + + fifo8_push_all(&s->tx_fifo, buf, size); + + if (fifo8_is_full(&s->tx_fifo)) { + s->txfifo |= SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO_FULL; + } + + timer_mod(s->fifo_trigger_handle, current_time + 100); +} + static uint64_t sifive_uart_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size) { @@ -82,7 +147,7 @@ sifive_uart_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned int size) return 0x80000000; case SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO: - return 0; /* Should check tx fifo */ + return s->txfifo; case SIFIVE_UART_IE: return s->ie; case SIFIVE_UART_IP: @@ -106,12 +171,10 @@ sifive_uart_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, { SiFiveUARTState *s = opaque; uint32_t value = val64; - unsigned char ch = value; switch (addr) { case SIFIVE_UART_TXFIFO: - qemu_chr_fe_write(&s->chr, &ch, 1); - sifive_uart_update_irq(s); + sifive_uart_write_tx_fifo(s, (uint8_t *) &value, 1); return; case SIFIVE_UART_IE: s->ie = val64; @@ -131,6 +194,13 @@ sifive_uart_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, __func__, (int)addr, (int)value); } +static void fifo_trigger_update(void *opaque) +{ + SiFiveUARTState *s = opaque; + + sifive_uart_xmit(NULL, G_IO_OUT, s); +} + static const MemoryRegionOps sifive_uart_ops = { .read = sifive_uart_read, .write = sifive_uart_write, @@ -197,6 +267,9 @@ static void sifive_uart_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) { SiFiveUARTState *s = SIFIVE_UART(dev); + s->fifo_trigger_handle = timer_new_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL, + fifo_trigger_update, s); + qemu_chr_fe_set_handlers(&s->chr, sifive_uart_can_rx, sifive_uart_rx, sifive_uart_event, sifive_uart_be_change, s, NULL, true); @@ -206,12 +279,18 @@ static void sifive_uart_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) static void sifive_uart_reset_enter(Object *obj, ResetType type) { SiFiveUARTState *s = SIFIVE_UART(obj); + + s->txfifo = 0; s->ie = 0; s->ip = 0; s->txctrl = 0; s->rxctrl = 0; s->div = 0; + s->rx_fifo_len = 0; + + memset(s->rx_fifo, 0, SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE); + fifo8_create(&s->tx_fifo, SIFIVE_UART_TX_FIFO_SIZE); } static void sifive_uart_reset_hold(Object *obj, ResetType type) @@ -222,8 +301,8 @@ static void sifive_uart_reset_hold(Object *obj, ResetType type) static const VMStateDescription vmstate_sifive_uart = { .name = TYPE_SIFIVE_UART, - .version_id = 1, - .minimum_version_id = 1, + .version_id = 2, + .minimum_version_id = 2, .fields = (const VMStateField[]) { VMSTATE_UINT8_ARRAY(rx_fifo, SiFiveUARTState, SIFIVE_UART_RX_FIFO_SIZE), @@ -233,6 +312,9 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_sifive_uart = { VMSTATE_UINT32(txctrl, SiFiveUARTState), VMSTATE_UINT32(rxctrl, SiFiveUARTState), VMSTATE_UINT32(div, SiFiveUARTState), + VMSTATE_UINT32(txfifo, SiFiveUARTState), + VMSTATE_FIFO8(tx_fifo, SiFiveUARTState), + VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(fifo_trigger_handle, SiFiveUARTState), VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST() }, };