From patchwork Wed Sep 25 11:10:01 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Huth X-Patchwork-Id: 13811939 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C131C369D1 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stPvo-0001tE-3M; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:11:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stPvk-0001Zv-9g for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:11:36 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1stPvi-0003aj-SA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:11:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1727262693; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=P3IhRmhquo3F0qLBHo1vJbRPHSzR8dkJy4GE+Sv3yws=; b=Pu6UzU6buLRi+S7B7xfIF1afO8N5RoIMH5ynutmjzVXKW7JIbYTaTceyMlIPfoSlZmUpp3 JW0/+9b0v7WsMHKX0bKTcAUwE62OMkIkSZchqjsVt4N0ls4fQtYqGVQs4MeNqmuXDCJehS KTmbN39tzklSI9g8MX1YJ0aT2KoUAKE= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-515-C_hfMQZ_Mr-6oKAiXOsM6w-1; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 07:11:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: C_hfMQZ_Mr-6oKAiXOsM6w-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (unknown [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 613781956064; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth-p1g4.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.193.206]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726F41956094; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:11:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell , Pierrick Bouvier Subject: [PULL 20/44] hw/ppc: replace assert(false) with g_assert_not_reached() Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 13:10:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20240925111029.24082-21-thuth@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240925111029.24082-1-thuth@redhat.com> References: <20240925111029.24082-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.108, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Pierrick Bouvier This patch is part of a series that moves towards a consistent use of g_assert_not_reached() rather than an ad hoc mix of different assertion mechanisms. Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza Signed-off-by: Pierrick Bouvier Message-ID: <20240919044641.386068-13-pierrick.bouvier@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- hw/ppc/spapr_events.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c index cb0eeee587..38ac1cb786 100644 --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_events.c @@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static void spapr_hotplug_req_event(uint8_t hp_id, uint8_t hp_action, /* we shouldn't be signaling hotplug events for resources * that don't support them */ - g_assert(false); + g_assert_not_reached(); return; }