From patchwork Wed Jan 29 16:00:23 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fabiano Rosas X-Patchwork-Id: 13953923 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C430C0218D for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tdAWC-00042A-TE; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:02:21 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tdAVK-0003GI-NG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:01:26 -0500 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.223.130]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tdAVI-0005EF-6f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 11:01:25 -0500 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FD5521109; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:01:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738166481; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tyQ8iNi8nTPP5FzNwsYboT5UyLB4GDl+YnTjn8T3EEs=; b=h5+NFBYhE7yJDOhCaHmabaBELM4NdNNBfIeEv+25JMGCVLd6su2Q/8wUklq6Nau3O3Q082 D5XQTqlKS6RrnfCcC6ExdKXSoVlAYakaG6pzir5EZYEoxUapDYLz1TRFNwwj95lFgIrJkg FJR7vuAytqCJwaaCesEB+uISFlzH7So= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738166481; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tyQ8iNi8nTPP5FzNwsYboT5UyLB4GDl+YnTjn8T3EEs=; b=nIi07LzbjqE88M6PV/8L+DXQlzDzAFe3XTjUfem7cDc6ZxkMMPD/ctT1Y5ZPOffjm7pVks T3eL66Tsh2mj82AQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738166481; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tyQ8iNi8nTPP5FzNwsYboT5UyLB4GDl+YnTjn8T3EEs=; b=h5+NFBYhE7yJDOhCaHmabaBELM4NdNNBfIeEv+25JMGCVLd6su2Q/8wUklq6Nau3O3Q082 D5XQTqlKS6RrnfCcC6ExdKXSoVlAYakaG6pzir5EZYEoxUapDYLz1TRFNwwj95lFgIrJkg FJR7vuAytqCJwaaCesEB+uISFlzH7So= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738166481; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=tyQ8iNi8nTPP5FzNwsYboT5UyLB4GDl+YnTjn8T3EEs=; b=nIi07LzbjqE88M6PV/8L+DXQlzDzAFe3XTjUfem7cDc6ZxkMMPD/ctT1Y5ZPOffjm7pVks T3eL66Tsh2mj82AQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE13A137DB; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id uEwyI89QmmffPAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:01:19 +0000 From: Fabiano Rosas To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Xu , Steve Sistare Subject: [PULL 06/42] memory: add RAM_PRIVATE Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:00:23 -0300 Message-Id: <20250129160059.6987-7-farosas@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20250129160059.6987-1-farosas@suse.de> References: <20250129160059.6987-1-farosas@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:mid,suse.de:email,oracle.com:email] Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.223.130; envelope-from=farosas@suse.de; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org From: Steve Sistare Define the RAM_PRIVATE flag. In RAMBlock creation functions, if MAP_SHARED is 0 in the flags parameter, in a subsequent patch the implementation may still create a shared mapping if other conditions require it. Callers who specifically want a private mapping, eg for objects specified by the user, must pass RAM_PRIVATE. After RAMBlock creation, MAP_SHARED in the block's flags indicates whether the block is shared or private, and MAP_PRIVATE is omitted. Signed-off-by: Steve Sistare Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1736967650-129648-6-git-send-email-steven.sistare@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas --- backends/hostmem-epc.c | 2 +- backends/hostmem-file.c | 2 +- backends/hostmem-memfd.c | 2 +- backends/hostmem-ram.c | 2 +- include/exec/memory.h | 10 ++++++++++ system/physmem.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 6 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/backends/hostmem-epc.c b/backends/hostmem-epc.c index eb4b95dfd7..1fa2d031e4 100644 --- a/backends/hostmem-epc.c +++ b/backends/hostmem-epc.c @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ sgx_epc_backend_memory_alloc(HostMemoryBackend *backend, Error **errp) backend->aligned = true; name = object_get_canonical_path(OBJECT(backend)); - ram_flags = (backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : 0) | RAM_PROTECTED; + ram_flags = (backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : RAM_PRIVATE) | RAM_PROTECTED; return memory_region_init_ram_from_fd(&backend->mr, OBJECT(backend), name, backend->size, ram_flags, fd, 0, errp); } diff --git a/backends/hostmem-file.c b/backends/hostmem-file.c index 46321fda84..691a827819 100644 --- a/backends/hostmem-file.c +++ b/backends/hostmem-file.c @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ file_backend_memory_alloc(HostMemoryBackend *backend, Error **errp) backend->aligned = true; name = host_memory_backend_get_name(backend); - ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : 0; + ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : RAM_PRIVATE; ram_flags |= fb->readonly ? RAM_READONLY_FD : 0; ram_flags |= fb->rom == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON ? RAM_READONLY : 0; ram_flags |= backend->reserve ? 0 : RAM_NORESERVE; diff --git a/backends/hostmem-memfd.c b/backends/hostmem-memfd.c index d4d0620e6c..1672da9e30 100644 --- a/backends/hostmem-memfd.c +++ b/backends/hostmem-memfd.c @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ memfd_backend_memory_alloc(HostMemoryBackend *backend, Error **errp) backend->aligned = true; name = host_memory_backend_get_name(backend); - ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : 0; + ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : RAM_PRIVATE; ram_flags |= backend->reserve ? 0 : RAM_NORESERVE; ram_flags |= backend->guest_memfd ? RAM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0; return memory_region_init_ram_from_fd(&backend->mr, OBJECT(backend), name, diff --git a/backends/hostmem-ram.c b/backends/hostmem-ram.c index 39aac6bf35..868ae6ca80 100644 --- a/backends/hostmem-ram.c +++ b/backends/hostmem-ram.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ ram_backend_memory_alloc(HostMemoryBackend *backend, Error **errp) } name = host_memory_backend_get_name(backend); - ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : 0; + ram_flags = backend->share ? RAM_SHARED : RAM_PRIVATE; ram_flags |= backend->reserve ? 0 : RAM_NORESERVE; ram_flags |= backend->guest_memfd ? RAM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0; return memory_region_init_ram_flags_nomigrate(&backend->mr, OBJECT(backend), diff --git a/include/exec/memory.h b/include/exec/memory.h index 3ee1901b52..9f73b59867 100644 --- a/include/exec/memory.h +++ b/include/exec/memory.h @@ -246,6 +246,16 @@ typedef struct IOMMUTLBEvent { /* RAM can be private that has kvm guest memfd backend */ #define RAM_GUEST_MEMFD (1 << 12) +/* + * In RAMBlock creation functions, if MAP_SHARED is 0 in the flags parameter, + * the implementation may still create a shared mapping if other conditions + * require it. Callers who specifically want a private mapping, eg objects + * specified by the user, must pass RAM_PRIVATE. + * After RAMBlock creation, MAP_SHARED in the block's flags indicates whether + * the block is shared or private, and MAP_PRIVATE is omitted. + */ +#define RAM_PRIVATE (1 << 13) + static inline void iommu_notifier_init(IOMMUNotifier *n, IOMMUNotify fn, IOMMUNotifierFlag flags, hwaddr start, hwaddr end, diff --git a/system/physmem.c b/system/physmem.c index e4355649e9..03fac0a64f 100644 --- a/system/physmem.c +++ b/system/physmem.c @@ -1952,7 +1952,11 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_from_fd(ram_addr_t size, ram_addr_t max_size, ERRP_GUARD(); RAMBlock *new_block; Error *local_err = NULL; - int64_t file_size, file_align; + int64_t file_size, file_align, share_flags; + + share_flags = ram_flags & (RAM_PRIVATE | RAM_SHARED); + assert(share_flags != (RAM_SHARED | RAM_PRIVATE)); + ram_flags &= ~RAM_PRIVATE; /* Just support these ram flags by now. */ assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_PMEM | RAM_NORESERVE | @@ -2097,7 +2101,11 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_internal(ram_addr_t size, ram_addr_t max_size, { RAMBlock *new_block; Error *local_err = NULL; - int align; + int align, share_flags; + + share_flags = ram_flags & (RAM_PRIVATE | RAM_SHARED); + assert(share_flags != (RAM_SHARED | RAM_PRIVATE)); + ram_flags &= ~RAM_PRIVATE; assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC | RAM_NORESERVE | RAM_GUEST_MEMFD)) == 0); @@ -2172,7 +2180,8 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_from_ptr(ram_addr_t size, void *host, RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc(ram_addr_t size, uint32_t ram_flags, MemoryRegion *mr, Error **errp) { - assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_NORESERVE | RAM_GUEST_MEMFD)) == 0); + assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_NORESERVE | RAM_GUEST_MEMFD | + RAM_PRIVATE)) == 0); return qemu_ram_alloc_internal(size, size, NULL, NULL, ram_flags, mr, errp); }