From patchwork Tue Mar 11 16:00:03 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kevin Wolf X-Patchwork-Id: 14012234 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78759C282EC for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ts250-0006vf-RY; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:03:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ts228-00040D-PV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:00:48 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ts223-0005hG-KJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:00:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1741708838; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AhHL2Fdt+g9QlS9SfWAj9l1MOwzrzbrrezwChzAgHIQ=; b=d7Oin3Z1R6bSn5qxiJC7FaREe728MSan9wWIkL5vnY0PnL3ESkzhmiqVu+NnEUQNh100T3 Gif1ebh9woqxSYcjODQdYsenUbrMkg89qlfXn/LlSEo+IW+EAtEPnHvUE2x/FTkYXlKh1d GsBmfr2Lto/etxFKSyUhyb92ETs4Pec= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-68-0c4lZ8eENoemJB67w3EoWw-1; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:00:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0c4lZ8eENoemJB67w3EoWw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 0c4lZ8eENoemJB67w3EoWw_1741708834 Received: from mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6071A19560A2; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merkur.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.33.18]) by mx-prod-int-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ED71800373; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:00:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Wolf To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 04/22] block/io: Ignore FUA with cache.no-flush=on Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:00:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20250311160021.349761-5-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250311160021.349761-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20250311160021.349761-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.93 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org For block drivers that don't advertise FUA support, we already call bdrv_co_flush(), which considers BDRV_O_NO_FLUSH. However, drivers that do support FUA still see the FUA flag with BDRV_O_NO_FLUSH and get the associated performance penalty that cache.no-flush=on was supposed to avoid. Clear FUA for write requests if BDRV_O_NO_FLUSH is set. Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20250307221634.71951-3-kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- block/io.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index d369b994df..1ba8d1aeea 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -1058,6 +1058,10 @@ bdrv_driver_pwritev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, return -ENOMEDIUM; } + if (bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_NO_FLUSH) { + flags &= ~BDRV_REQ_FUA; + } + if ((flags & BDRV_REQ_FUA) && (~bs->supported_write_flags & BDRV_REQ_FUA)) { flags &= ~BDRV_REQ_FUA;