From patchwork Thu Mar 20 06:50:12 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Huth X-Patchwork-Id: 14023471 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A31C28B30 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 06:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tv9jw-00010r-RZ; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 02:50:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tv9jn-000109-Bn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 02:50:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tv9jk-0007uO-Ia for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 02:50:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1742453438; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NJTHZXxifyS69+9B/JLeUEUtbiGvlV9Y1yJtBCosFXc=; b=YRBFVyuec2uPA+hh/IokLugjSkvigRijzsBWRSscSZ5O5J/s9Un5XohUUm6XnDhPEUEkol RQQD00o+gxhTgjnW8EoSovKSTFNyP3h6EV3q+/T67ZP6Q6+3SH43167uwXcv0thVEjmHY+ wuVd3XiRozHunSFc7ureAOXlKpaiaCg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-35-165-154-97.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.165.154.97]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-424-tat2Kl8FMbiU1v1vFg-ytw-1; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 02:50:34 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tat2Kl8FMbiU1v1vFg-ytw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: tat2Kl8FMbiU1v1vFg-ytw_1742453433 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-06.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E55180025B; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 06:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth-p1g4.redhat.com (unknown [10.45.224.78]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD71F19792DC; Thu, 20 Mar 2025 06:50:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Nicholas Piggin , =?utf-8?q?C?= =?utf-8?q?=C3=A9dric_Le_Goater?= Cc: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Thomas Huth Subject: [PATCH] tests/functional/test_ppc64_replay: Mark the e500 test as flaky Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 07:50:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20250320065012.309520-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.337, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org The test_ppc64_e500 occasionally fails (it just hangs and finally times out). The same issue could also be reproduced with the former Avocado test already (especially if the host system is under heavy load), so it's not a new regression. It's very likely the issue that has been filed at https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2523 instead (e.g. I could not reproduce the issue in older commits before commit 578912ad), so use this URL for the reasoning in the the decorator. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé --- Here are some examples where the test failed: https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/9391454847 https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/9457171828 https://gitlab.com/thuth/qemu/-/jobs/9458371668 tests/functional/test_ppc64_replay.py | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/functional/test_ppc64_replay.py b/tests/functional/test_ppc64_replay.py index 48ce1b7f1e1..e8c9c4bcbf8 100755 --- a/tests/functional/test_ppc64_replay.py +++ b/tests/functional/test_ppc64_replay.py @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ # # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later -from qemu_test import Asset +from qemu_test import Asset, skipFlakyTest from replay_kernel import ReplayKernelBase @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ class Ppc64Replay(ReplayKernelBase): 'day19.tar.xz'), '20b1bb5a8488c664defbb5d283addc91a05335a936c63b3f5ff7eee74b725755') + @skipFlakyTest('https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2523') def test_ppc64_e500(self): self.set_machine('ppce500') self.cpu = 'e5500'