| Message ID | 26e2621ab6cef4d8c3e944dc9ebb6d2d0d5e9d2d.camel@infradead.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [for-6.1,v2] i386: do not call cpudef-only models functions for max, host, base | expand |
Acked-by: Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> I'll try to find time tonight to give you a tested by. Ciao, Claudio On 11/30/21 2:42 PM, David Woodhouse wrote: > We don't need to check kvm_enable_x2apic(). It's perfectly OK to support > interrupt remapping even if we can't address CPUs above 254. Kind of > pointless, but still functional. > > The check on kvm_enable_x2apic() needs to happen *anyway* in order to > allow CPUs above 254 even without an IOMMU, so allow that to happen > elsewhere. > > However, we do require the *split* irqchip in order to rewrite I/OAPIC > destinations. So fix that check while we're here. > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> > --- > hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > index 294499ee20..b0439d0fbf 100644 > --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c > @@ -3746,15 +3746,10 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error **errp) > ON_OFF_AUTO_ON : ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; > } > if (s->intr_eim == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON && !s->buggy_eim) { > - if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) { > + if (!kvm_irqchip_is_split()) { > error_setg(errp, "eim=on requires accel=kvm,kernel-irqchip=split"); > return false; > } > - if (!kvm_enable_x2apic()) { > - error_setg(errp, "eim=on requires support on the KVM side" > - "(X2APIC_API, first shipped in v4.7)"); > - return false; > - } > } > > /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */ >
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c index 294499ee20..b0439d0fbf 100644 --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c @@ -3746,15 +3746,10 @@ static bool vtd_decide_config(IntelIOMMUState *s, Error **errp) ON_OFF_AUTO_ON : ON_OFF_AUTO_OFF; } if (s->intr_eim == ON_OFF_AUTO_ON && !s->buggy_eim) { - if (!kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) { + if (!kvm_irqchip_is_split()) { error_setg(errp, "eim=on requires accel=kvm,kernel-irqchip=split"); return false; } - if (!kvm_enable_x2apic()) { - error_setg(errp, "eim=on requires support on the KVM side" - "(X2APIC_API, first shipped in v4.7)"); - return false; - } } /* Currently only address widths supported are 39 and 48 bits */
We don't need to check kvm_enable_x2apic(). It's perfectly OK to support interrupt remapping even if we can't address CPUs above 254. Kind of pointless, but still functional. The check on kvm_enable_x2apic() needs to happen *anyway* in order to allow CPUs above 254 even without an IOMMU, so allow that to happen elsewhere. However, we do require the *split* irqchip in order to rewrite I/OAPIC destinations. So fix that check while we're here. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> --- hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)