Message ID | 4485ad60-45b9-4499-8f89-830c6e67decb@chinatelecom.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | docs: Fix title format errors in the multi-process.rst | expand |
On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 08:46, Guoyi Tu <tugy@chinatelecom.cn> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tugy@chinatelecom.cn> > --- > docs/devel/multi-process.rst | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) I have a couple of questions about whether these are the right heading levels. But this document uses quite a lot of heading/subheading levels, and I'm not very familiar with the contents, so my suggestions below might not be right. > diff --git a/docs/devel/multi-process.rst b/docs/devel/multi-process.rst > index 4ef539c0b0..223f878139 100644 > --- a/docs/devel/multi-process.rst > +++ b/docs/devel/multi-process.rst > @@ -185,7 +185,9 @@ Another difference is that in the vhost user model, > a single daemon can > support multiple QEMU instances. This is contrary to the security regime > desired, in which the emulation application should only be allowed to > access the files or devices the VM it's running on behalf of can access. > -#### qemu-io model > + > +qemu-io model > +''''''''''''' Should this be ^^^^^^, i.e. same heading level as "vhost user model" earlier in this subsection? > ``qemu-io`` is a test harness used to test changes to the QEMU block > backend > object code (e.g., the code that implements disk images for disk driver > @@ -587,7 +589,9 @@ described below attempt to ameliorate this effect by > allowing the > emulation process to communicate directly with the kernel KVM driver. > The KVM file descriptors created would be passed to the emulation process > via initialization messages, much like the guest memory table is done. > -#### MMIO acceleration > + > +MMIO acceleration > +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This seems like the right heading level, but should the following headings ("data structures", "master descriptor", "slave descriptor", "kvm_io_device ops") drop down a heading level from ^^^ to ''', on the basis that they're sub-headings under "MMIO acceleration" ? thanks -- PMM
diff --git a/docs/devel/multi-process.rst b/docs/devel/multi-process.rst index 4ef539c0b0..223f878139 100644 --- a/docs/devel/multi-process.rst +++ b/docs/devel/multi-process.rst @@ -185,7 +185,9 @@ Another difference is that in the vhost user model, a single daemon can support multiple QEMU instances. This is contrary to the security regime desired, in which the emulation application should only be allowed to access the files or devices the VM it's running on behalf of can access. -#### qemu-io model + +qemu-io model +''''''''''''' ``qemu-io`` is a test harness used to test changes to the QEMU block
Signed-off-by: Guoyi Tu <tugy@chinatelecom.cn> --- docs/devel/multi-process.rst | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) backend object code (e.g., the code that implements disk images for disk driver @@ -587,7 +589,9 @@ described below attempt to ameliorate this effect by allowing the emulation process to communicate directly with the kernel KVM driver. The KVM file descriptors created would be passed to the emulation process via initialization messages, much like the guest memory table is done. -#### MMIO acceleration + +MMIO acceleration +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Vhost user applications can receive guest virtio driver stores directly from KVM. The issue with the eventfd mechanism used by vhost user is