diff mbox series

[v3,26/33] target/ppc/mmu_common.c: Simplify ppc_booke_xlate() part 1

Message ID 5074c129ebfea0e1dfc22ef4691d8b62038d59b2.1715125376.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Misc PPC exception and BookE MMU clean ups | expand

Commit Message

BALATON Zoltan May 8, 2024, 12:15 a.m. UTC
Move setting error_code that appears in every case out in front and
hoist the common fall through case for BOOKE206 as well which allows
removing the nested switches.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
---
 target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 41 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

Comments

Nicholas Piggin May 8, 2024, 1:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed May 8, 2024 at 10:15 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> Move setting error_code that appears in every case out in front and
> hoist the common fall through case for BOOKE206 as well which allows
> removing the nested switches.
>
 
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> ---
>  target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 41 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> index 788e2bebd5..c725a7932f 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> @@ -1205,58 +1205,41 @@ static bool ppc_booke_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
>      }
>  
>      log_cpu_state_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, cs, 0);
> +    env->error_code = 0;
> +    if (ret == -1) {
> +        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206) {
> +            booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
> +        }
> +    }
>      if (access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH) {
>          switch (ret) {
>          case -1:
>              /* No matches in page tables or TLB */
> -            switch (env->mmu_model) {
> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
> -                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
> -                /* fall through */
> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
> -                cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
> -                env->error_code = 0;
> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
> -                break;
> -            default:
> -                g_assert_not_reached();
> -            }
> +            cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>              break;
>          case -2:
>              /* Access rights violation */
>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> -            env->error_code = 0;
>              break;
>          case -3:
>              /* No execute protection violation */
>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
>              env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = 0;

I don't know BookE well but AFAIKS it says ESR if not set explicitly
is generally cleared to 0 by interrupts which I guess is the case here.
I don't see why the same would not apply to the -2 case either. That
would reduce special cases.

Although that's a behaviour change. It's possible current beahviour is
deliberate or matches some particular CPU. Not something for this
series.

Thanks,
Nick

> -            env->error_code = 0;
>              break;
>          }
>      } else {
>          switch (ret) {
>          case -1:
>              /* No matches in page tables or TLB */
> -            switch (env->mmu_model) {
> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
> -                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
> -                /* fall through */
> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
> -                cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DTLB;
> -                env->error_code = 0;
> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
> -                break;
> -            default:
> -                g_assert_not_reached();
> -            }
> +            cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DTLB;
> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>              break;
>          case -2:
>              /* Access rights violation */
>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
> -            env->error_code = 0;
>              env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
>              env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>              break;
BALATON Zoltan May 8, 2024, 3:25 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 8 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed May 8, 2024 at 10:15 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>> Move setting error_code that appears in every case out in front and
>> hoist the common fall through case for BOOKE206 as well which allows
>> removing the nested switches.
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
>> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
>> ---
>>  target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 41 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
>> index 788e2bebd5..c725a7932f 100644
>> --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
>> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
>> @@ -1205,58 +1205,41 @@ static bool ppc_booke_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
>>      }
>>
>>      log_cpu_state_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, cs, 0);
>> +    env->error_code = 0;
>> +    if (ret == -1) {
>> +        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206) {
>> +            booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
>> +        }
>> +    }
>>      if (access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH) {
>>          switch (ret) {
>>          case -1:
>>              /* No matches in page tables or TLB */
>> -            switch (env->mmu_model) {
>> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
>> -                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
>> -                /* fall through */
>> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
>> -                cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
>> -                env->error_code = 0;
>> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
>> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>> -                break;
>> -            default:
>> -                g_assert_not_reached();
>> -            }
>> +            cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
>> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
>> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>>              break;
>>          case -2:
>>              /* Access rights violation */
>>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
>> -            env->error_code = 0;
>>              break;
>>          case -3:
>>              /* No execute protection violation */
>>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
>>              env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = 0;
>
> I don't know BookE well but AFAIKS it says ESR if not set explicitly
> is generally cleared to 0 by interrupts which I guess is the case here.
> I don't see why the same would not apply to the -2 case either. That
> would reduce special cases.
>
> Although that's a behaviour change. It's possible current beahviour is
> deliberate or matches some particular CPU. Not something for this
> series.

I don't know what the correct behaviour should be so I just tried to keep 
what was there. After this clean it should be simpler to find out and 
correct this later.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

> Thanks,
> Nick
>
>> -            env->error_code = 0;
>>              break;
>>          }
>>      } else {
>>          switch (ret) {
>>          case -1:
>>              /* No matches in page tables or TLB */
>> -            switch (env->mmu_model) {
>> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
>> -                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
>> -                /* fall through */
>> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
>> -                cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DTLB;
>> -                env->error_code = 0;
>> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
>> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>> -                break;
>> -            default:
>> -                g_assert_not_reached();
>> -            }
>> +            cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DTLB;
>> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
>> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>>              break;
>>          case -2:
>>              /* Access rights violation */
>>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
>> -            env->error_code = 0;
>>              env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
>>              env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
>>              break;
>
>
>
Nicholas Piggin May 9, 2024, 5:53 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu May 9, 2024 at 1:25 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> On Wed, 8 May 2024, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > On Wed May 8, 2024 at 10:15 AM AEST, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
> >> Move setting error_code that appears in every case out in front and
> >> hoist the common fall through case for BOOKE206 as well which allows
> >> removing the nested switches.
> >>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
> >> ---
> >>  target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 41 ++++++++++++-----------------------------
> >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> >> index 788e2bebd5..c725a7932f 100644
> >> --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> >> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
> >> @@ -1205,58 +1205,41 @@ static bool ppc_booke_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
> >>      }
> >>
> >>      log_cpu_state_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, cs, 0);
> >> +    env->error_code = 0;
> >> +    if (ret == -1) {
> >> +        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206) {
> >> +            booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
> >> +        }
> >> +    }
> >>      if (access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH) {
> >>          switch (ret) {
> >>          case -1:
> >>              /* No matches in page tables or TLB */
> >> -            switch (env->mmu_model) {
> >> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
> >> -                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
> >> -                /* fall through */
> >> -            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
> >> -                cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
> >> -                env->error_code = 0;
> >> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
> >> -                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
> >> -                break;
> >> -            default:
> >> -                g_assert_not_reached();
> >> -            }
> >> +            cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
> >> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
> >> +            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
> >>              break;
> >>          case -2:
> >>              /* Access rights violation */
> >>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> >> -            env->error_code = 0;
> >>              break;
> >>          case -3:
> >>              /* No execute protection violation */
> >>              cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
> >>              env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = 0;
> >
> > I don't know BookE well but AFAIKS it says ESR if not set explicitly
> > is generally cleared to 0 by interrupts which I guess is the case here.
> > I don't see why the same would not apply to the -2 case either. That
> > would reduce special cases.
> >
> > Although that's a behaviour change. It's possible current beahviour is
> > deliberate or matches some particular CPU. Not something for this
> > series.
>
> I don't know what the correct behaviour should be so I just tried to keep 
> what was there. After this clean it should be simpler to find out and 
> correct this later.

Right. Keeping exact behaviour is the right thing to do for such a
series, so it's good you have been doing it. It was just an offhand
comment because the special case annoyed me :)

Thanks,
Nick
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
index 788e2bebd5..c725a7932f 100644
--- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
+++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c
@@ -1205,58 +1205,41 @@  static bool ppc_booke_xlate(PowerPCCPU *cpu, vaddr eaddr,
     }
 
     log_cpu_state_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, cs, 0);
+    env->error_code = 0;
+    if (ret == -1) {
+        if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206) {
+            booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
+        }
+    }
     if (access_type == MMU_INST_FETCH) {
         switch (ret) {
         case -1:
             /* No matches in page tables or TLB */
-            switch (env->mmu_model) {
-            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
-                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
-                /* fall through */
-            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
-                cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
-                env->error_code = 0;
-                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
-                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
-                break;
-            default:
-                g_assert_not_reached();
-            }
+            cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB;
+            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
+            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
             break;
         case -2:
             /* Access rights violation */
             cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
-            env->error_code = 0;
             break;
         case -3:
             /* No execute protection violation */
             cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_ISI;
             env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = 0;
-            env->error_code = 0;
             break;
         }
     } else {
         switch (ret) {
         case -1:
             /* No matches in page tables or TLB */
-            switch (env->mmu_model) {
-            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE206:
-                booke206_update_mas_tlb_miss(env, eaddr, access_type, mmu_idx);
-                /* fall through */
-            case POWERPC_MMU_BOOKE:
-                cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DTLB;
-                env->error_code = 0;
-                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
-                env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
-                break;
-            default:
-                g_assert_not_reached();
-            }
+            cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DTLB;
+            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
+            env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
             break;
         case -2:
             /* Access rights violation */
             cs->exception_index = POWERPC_EXCP_DSI;
-            env->error_code = 0;
             env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_DEAR] = eaddr;
             env->spr[SPR_BOOKE_ESR] = mmubooke206_esr(mmu_idx, access_type);
             break;