@@ -5894,9 +5894,9 @@ if test "$int128" = "yes"; then
int main(void)
{
unsigned __int128 x = 0, y = 0;
- y = __atomic_load_16(&x, 0);
- __atomic_store_16(&x, y, 0);
- __atomic_compare_exchange_16(&x, &y, x, 0, 0, 0);
+ y = __atomic_load_n(&x, 0);
+ __atomic_store_n(&x, y, 0);
+ __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&x, &y, x, 0, 0, 0);
return 0;
}
EOF
@@ -5911,7 +5911,7 @@ if test "$int128" = yes && test "$atomic128" = no; then
int main(void)
{
unsigned __int128 x = 0, y = 0;
- __sync_val_compare_and_swap_16(&x, y, x);
+ __sync_val_compare_and_swap(&x, y, x);
return 0;
}
EOF
@@ -5931,11 +5931,11 @@ int main(void)
{
uint64_t x = 0, y = 0;
#ifdef __ATOMIC_RELAXED
- y = __atomic_load_8(&x, 0);
- __atomic_store_8(&x, y, 0);
- __atomic_compare_exchange_8(&x, &y, x, 0, 0, 0);
- __atomic_exchange_8(&x, y, 0);
- __atomic_fetch_add_8(&x, y, 0);
+ y = __atomic_load_n(&x, 0);
+ __atomic_store_n(&x, y, 0);
+ __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&x, &y, x, 0, 0, 0);
+ __atomic_exchange_n(&x, y, 0);
+ __atomic_fetch_add(&x, y, 0);
#else
typedef char is_host64[sizeof(void *) >= sizeof(uint64_t) ? 1 : -1];
__sync_lock_test_and_set(&x, y);
The public interface for __atomic_* and __sync_* do not contain the explicit *_{number} versions: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html They appear to be GCC's internal symbols which happen to work. However, clang does not recognize them. Replace the existing usages with the `_n` versions (or no suffix) which are the documented API. Signed-off-by: Shu-Chun Weng <scw@google.com> --- configure | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)