| Message ID | 20220728024327.1202-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2] rcu: Display registers of self-detected stall as far as possible | expand |
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:43:27AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > For architectures that do not support NMI interrupts, registers is not > printed when rcu stall is self-detected. However, this information is > useful for analyzing the root cause of the fault. Fortunately, the rcu > stall is always detected in the tick interrupt handler. So we can take > it through get_irq_regs() and display it through show_regs(). Further, > show_regs() unwind the call trace based on 'regs', the worthless call > trace associated with tick handling will be omitted, this helps us to > focus more on the problem. > > This is an example on arm64: > [ 27.501721] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU > [ 27.502238] rcu: 0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) idle=4f7/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=2594/2594 fqs=619 > [ 27.502632] (t=1251 jiffies g=2989 q=29 ncpus=4) > [ 27.503845] CPU: 0 PID: 306 Comm: test0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7-00009-g1c1a6c29ff99-dirty #46 > [ 27.504732] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) > [ 27.504947] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > [ 27.504998] pc : arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 > [ 27.505301] lr : arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 > [ 27.505328] sp : ffff80000b29bdf0 > [ 27.505345] x29: ffff80000b29bdf0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000 > [ 27.505475] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 > [ 27.505553] x23: 0000000000001f40 x22: ffff800009849c48 x21: 000000065f871ae0 > [ 27.505627] x20: 00000000000025ec x19: ffff80000a6eb300 x18: ffffffffffffffff > [ 27.505654] x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff80000a6d0296 > [ 27.505681] x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff80000a29bc18 x12: 0000000000000426 > [ 27.505709] x11: 0000000000000162 x10: ffff80000a2f3c18 x9 : ffff80000a29bc18 > [ 27.505736] x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffff80000a2f3c18 x6 : 00000000759bd013 > [ 27.505761] x5 : 01ffffffffffffff x4 : 0002dc6c00000000 x3 : 0000000000000017 > [ 27.505787] x2 : 00000000000025ec x1 : ffff80000b29bdf0 x0 : 0000000075a30653 > [ 27.505937] Call trace: > [ 27.506002] arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 > [ 27.506171] ktime_get+0x48/0xa0 > [ 27.506207] test_task+0x70/0xf0 > [ 27.506227] kthread+0x10c/0x110 > [ 27.506243] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > The old output is as follows: > [ 27.944550] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU > [ 27.944980] rcu: 0-....: (1249 ticks this GP) idle=cbb/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=2610/2610 fqs=614 > [ 27.945407] (t=1251 jiffies g=2681 q=28 ncpus=4) > [ 27.945731] Task dump for CPU 0: > [ 27.945844] task:test0 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 306 ppid: 2 flags:0x0000000a > [ 27.946073] Call trace: > [ 27.946151] dump_backtrace.part.0+0xc8/0xd4 > [ 27.946378] show_stack+0x18/0x70 > [ 27.946405] sched_show_task+0x150/0x180 > [ 27.946427] dump_cpu_task+0x44/0x54 > [ 27.947193] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xec/0x130 > [ 27.947212] rcu_sched_clock_irq+0xb18/0xef0 > [ 27.947231] update_process_times+0x68/0xac > [ 27.947248] tick_sched_handle+0x34/0x60 > [ 27.947266] tick_sched_timer+0x4c/0xa4 > [ 27.947281] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x178/0x360 > [ 27.947295] hrtimer_interrupt+0xe8/0x244 > [ 27.947309] arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x4c > [ 27.947326] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x88/0x230 > [ 27.947342] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x44 > [ 27.947357] gic_handle_irq+0x44/0xc4 > [ 27.947376] call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x54 > [ 27.947415] do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x94 > [ 27.947431] el1_interrupt+0x34/0x70 > [ 27.947447] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 > [ 27.947462] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 <--- the above backtrace is worthless > [ 27.947474] arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 > [ 27.947487] ktime_get+0x48/0xa0 > [ 27.947501] test_task+0x70/0xf0 > [ 27.947520] kthread+0x10c/0x110 > [ 27.947538] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> A nice improvement! But wouldn't it be better to push this code down into dump_cpu_task() itself, so that all callers could gain this benefit? Thanx, Paul > --- > kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > v1 --> v2: > Fix C99 build warning: > kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:358:10: error: call to undeclared function 'get_irq_regs'; > ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h > index a001e1e7a99269c..23bfd755c3f6e5b 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/kvm_para.h> > +#include <asm/irq_regs.h> > > ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// > // > @@ -350,6 +351,21 @@ static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags) > } > #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */ > > +static void rcu_dump_cpu_task(int cpu) > +{ > + if (cpu == smp_processor_id() && in_irq()) { > + struct pt_regs *regs; > + > + regs = get_irq_regs(); > + if (regs) { > + show_regs(regs); > + return; > + } > + } > + > + dump_cpu_task(cpu); > +} > + > /* > * Dump stacks of all tasks running on stalled CPUs. First try using > * NMIs, but fall back to manual remote stack tracing on architectures > @@ -369,7 +385,7 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(void) > if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) > pr_err("Offline CPU %d blocking current GP.\n", cpu); > else if (!trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(cpu)) > - dump_cpu_task(cpu); > + rcu_dump_cpu_task(cpu); > } > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags); > } > -- > 2.25.1 >
On 2022/7/29 0:15, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:43:27AM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> For architectures that do not support NMI interrupts, registers is not >> printed when rcu stall is self-detected. However, this information is >> useful for analyzing the root cause of the fault. Fortunately, the rcu >> stall is always detected in the tick interrupt handler. So we can take >> it through get_irq_regs() and display it through show_regs(). Further, >> show_regs() unwind the call trace based on 'regs', the worthless call >> trace associated with tick handling will be omitted, this helps us to >> focus more on the problem. >> >> This is an example on arm64: >> [ 27.501721] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU >> [ 27.502238] rcu: 0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) idle=4f7/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=2594/2594 fqs=619 >> [ 27.502632] (t=1251 jiffies g=2989 q=29 ncpus=4) >> [ 27.503845] CPU: 0 PID: 306 Comm: test0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7-00009-g1c1a6c29ff99-dirty #46 >> [ 27.504732] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) >> [ 27.504947] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) >> [ 27.504998] pc : arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 >> [ 27.505301] lr : arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 >> [ 27.505328] sp : ffff80000b29bdf0 >> [ 27.505345] x29: ffff80000b29bdf0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000 >> [ 27.505475] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 >> [ 27.505553] x23: 0000000000001f40 x22: ffff800009849c48 x21: 000000065f871ae0 >> [ 27.505627] x20: 00000000000025ec x19: ffff80000a6eb300 x18: ffffffffffffffff >> [ 27.505654] x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff80000a6d0296 >> [ 27.505681] x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff80000a29bc18 x12: 0000000000000426 >> [ 27.505709] x11: 0000000000000162 x10: ffff80000a2f3c18 x9 : ffff80000a29bc18 >> [ 27.505736] x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffff80000a2f3c18 x6 : 00000000759bd013 >> [ 27.505761] x5 : 01ffffffffffffff x4 : 0002dc6c00000000 x3 : 0000000000000017 >> [ 27.505787] x2 : 00000000000025ec x1 : ffff80000b29bdf0 x0 : 0000000075a30653 >> [ 27.505937] Call trace: >> [ 27.506002] arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 >> [ 27.506171] ktime_get+0x48/0xa0 >> [ 27.506207] test_task+0x70/0xf0 >> [ 27.506227] kthread+0x10c/0x110 >> [ 27.506243] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 >> >> The old output is as follows: >> [ 27.944550] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU >> [ 27.944980] rcu: 0-....: (1249 ticks this GP) idle=cbb/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=2610/2610 fqs=614 >> [ 27.945407] (t=1251 jiffies g=2681 q=28 ncpus=4) >> [ 27.945731] Task dump for CPU 0: >> [ 27.945844] task:test0 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 306 ppid: 2 flags:0x0000000a >> [ 27.946073] Call trace: >> [ 27.946151] dump_backtrace.part.0+0xc8/0xd4 >> [ 27.946378] show_stack+0x18/0x70 >> [ 27.946405] sched_show_task+0x150/0x180 >> [ 27.946427] dump_cpu_task+0x44/0x54 >> [ 27.947193] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xec/0x130 >> [ 27.947212] rcu_sched_clock_irq+0xb18/0xef0 >> [ 27.947231] update_process_times+0x68/0xac >> [ 27.947248] tick_sched_handle+0x34/0x60 >> [ 27.947266] tick_sched_timer+0x4c/0xa4 >> [ 27.947281] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x178/0x360 >> [ 27.947295] hrtimer_interrupt+0xe8/0x244 >> [ 27.947309] arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x4c >> [ 27.947326] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x88/0x230 >> [ 27.947342] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x44 >> [ 27.947357] gic_handle_irq+0x44/0xc4 >> [ 27.947376] call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x54 >> [ 27.947415] do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x94 >> [ 27.947431] el1_interrupt+0x34/0x70 >> [ 27.947447] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 >> [ 27.947462] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 <--- the above backtrace is worthless >> [ 27.947474] arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 >> [ 27.947487] ktime_get+0x48/0xa0 >> [ 27.947501] test_task+0x70/0xf0 >> [ 27.947520] kthread+0x10c/0x110 >> [ 27.947538] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> > > A nice improvement! > > But wouldn't it be better to push this code down into dump_cpu_task() > itself, so that all callers could gain this benefit? Oh, right. I will move it into dump_cpu_task(). > > Thanx, Paul > >> --- >> kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> v1 --> v2: >> Fix C99 build warning: >> kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:358:10: error: call to undeclared function 'get_irq_regs'; >> ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations >> >> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h >> index a001e1e7a99269c..23bfd755c3f6e5b 100644 >> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h >> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ >> */ >> >> #include <linux/kvm_para.h> >> +#include <asm/irq_regs.h> >> >> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// >> // >> @@ -350,6 +351,21 @@ static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags) >> } >> #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */ >> >> +static void rcu_dump_cpu_task(int cpu) >> +{ >> + if (cpu == smp_processor_id() && in_irq()) { >> + struct pt_regs *regs; >> + >> + regs = get_irq_regs(); >> + if (regs) { >> + show_regs(regs); >> + return; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + dump_cpu_task(cpu); >> +} >> + >> /* >> * Dump stacks of all tasks running on stalled CPUs. First try using >> * NMIs, but fall back to manual remote stack tracing on architectures >> @@ -369,7 +385,7 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(void) >> if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) >> pr_err("Offline CPU %d blocking current GP.\n", cpu); >> else if (!trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(cpu)) >> - dump_cpu_task(cpu); >> + rcu_dump_cpu_task(cpu); >> } >> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags); >> } >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> > . >
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h index a001e1e7a99269c..23bfd755c3f6e5b 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ */ #include <linux/kvm_para.h> +#include <asm/irq_regs.h> ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// // @@ -350,6 +351,21 @@ static int rcu_print_task_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags) } #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */ +static void rcu_dump_cpu_task(int cpu) +{ + if (cpu == smp_processor_id() && in_irq()) { + struct pt_regs *regs; + + regs = get_irq_regs(); + if (regs) { + show_regs(regs); + return; + } + } + + dump_cpu_task(cpu); +} + /* * Dump stacks of all tasks running on stalled CPUs. First try using * NMIs, but fall back to manual remote stack tracing on architectures @@ -369,7 +385,7 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(void) if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) pr_err("Offline CPU %d blocking current GP.\n", cpu); else if (!trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(cpu)) - dump_cpu_task(cpu); + rcu_dump_cpu_task(cpu); } raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags); }
For architectures that do not support NMI interrupts, registers is not printed when rcu stall is self-detected. However, this information is useful for analyzing the root cause of the fault. Fortunately, the rcu stall is always detected in the tick interrupt handler. So we can take it through get_irq_regs() and display it through show_regs(). Further, show_regs() unwind the call trace based on 'regs', the worthless call trace associated with tick handling will be omitted, this helps us to focus more on the problem. This is an example on arm64: [ 27.501721] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU [ 27.502238] rcu: 0-....: (1250 ticks this GP) idle=4f7/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=2594/2594 fqs=619 [ 27.502632] (t=1251 jiffies g=2989 q=29 ncpus=4) [ 27.503845] CPU: 0 PID: 306 Comm: test0 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7-00009-g1c1a6c29ff99-dirty #46 [ 27.504732] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) [ 27.504947] pstate: 20000005 (nzCv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) [ 27.504998] pc : arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 [ 27.505301] lr : arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 [ 27.505328] sp : ffff80000b29bdf0 [ 27.505345] x29: ffff80000b29bdf0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000 [ 27.505475] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000000 [ 27.505553] x23: 0000000000001f40 x22: ffff800009849c48 x21: 000000065f871ae0 [ 27.505627] x20: 00000000000025ec x19: ffff80000a6eb300 x18: ffffffffffffffff [ 27.505654] x17: 0000000000000001 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: ffff80000a6d0296 [ 27.505681] x14: ffffffffffffffff x13: ffff80000a29bc18 x12: 0000000000000426 [ 27.505709] x11: 0000000000000162 x10: ffff80000a2f3c18 x9 : ffff80000a29bc18 [ 27.505736] x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffff80000a2f3c18 x6 : 00000000759bd013 [ 27.505761] x5 : 01ffffffffffffff x4 : 0002dc6c00000000 x3 : 0000000000000017 [ 27.505787] x2 : 00000000000025ec x1 : ffff80000b29bdf0 x0 : 0000000075a30653 [ 27.505937] Call trace: [ 27.506002] arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 [ 27.506171] ktime_get+0x48/0xa0 [ 27.506207] test_task+0x70/0xf0 [ 27.506227] kthread+0x10c/0x110 [ 27.506243] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 The old output is as follows: [ 27.944550] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt self-detected stall on CPU [ 27.944980] rcu: 0-....: (1249 ticks this GP) idle=cbb/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=2610/2610 fqs=614 [ 27.945407] (t=1251 jiffies g=2681 q=28 ncpus=4) [ 27.945731] Task dump for CPU 0: [ 27.945844] task:test0 state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 306 ppid: 2 flags:0x0000000a [ 27.946073] Call trace: [ 27.946151] dump_backtrace.part.0+0xc8/0xd4 [ 27.946378] show_stack+0x18/0x70 [ 27.946405] sched_show_task+0x150/0x180 [ 27.946427] dump_cpu_task+0x44/0x54 [ 27.947193] rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xec/0x130 [ 27.947212] rcu_sched_clock_irq+0xb18/0xef0 [ 27.947231] update_process_times+0x68/0xac [ 27.947248] tick_sched_handle+0x34/0x60 [ 27.947266] tick_sched_timer+0x4c/0xa4 [ 27.947281] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x178/0x360 [ 27.947295] hrtimer_interrupt+0xe8/0x244 [ 27.947309] arch_timer_handler_virt+0x38/0x4c [ 27.947326] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x88/0x230 [ 27.947342] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x2c/0x44 [ 27.947357] gic_handle_irq+0x44/0xc4 [ 27.947376] call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x54 [ 27.947415] do_interrupt_handler+0x80/0x94 [ 27.947431] el1_interrupt+0x34/0x70 [ 27.947447] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 [ 27.947462] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 <--- the above backtrace is worthless [ 27.947474] arch_counter_read+0x18/0x24 [ 27.947487] ktime_get+0x48/0xa0 [ 27.947501] test_task+0x70/0xf0 [ 27.947520] kthread+0x10c/0x110 [ 27.947538] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> --- kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) v1 --> v2: Fix C99 build warning: kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h:358:10: error: call to undeclared function 'get_irq_regs'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations