diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Reuse freed element in free_by_rcu during allocation

Message ID 20221209010947.3130477-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 0893d6007db5cf397f3fc92b2a6935c3ed0c6f00
Headers show
Series Misc optimizations for bpf mem allocator | expand

Commit Message

Hou Tao Dec. 9, 2022, 1:09 a.m. UTC
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

When there are batched freeing operations on a specific CPU, part of
the freed elements ((high_watermark - lower_watermark) / 2 + 1) will be
indirectly moved into waiting_for_gp list through free_by_rcu list.
After call_rcu_in_progress becomes false again, the remaining elements
in free_by_rcu list will be moved to waiting_for_gp list by the next
invocation of free_bulk(). However if the expiration of RCU tasks trace
grace period is relatively slow, none element in free_by_rcu list will
be moved.

So instead of invoking __alloc_percpu_gfp() or kmalloc_node() to
allocate a new object, in alloc_bulk() just check whether or not there is
freed element in free_by_rcu list and reuse it if available.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 8f0d65f2474a..04d96d1b98a3 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -171,9 +171,24 @@  static void alloc_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, int cnt, int node)
 	memcg = get_memcg(c);
 	old_memcg = set_active_memcg(memcg);
 	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) {
-		obj = __alloc(c, node);
-		if (!obj)
-			break;
+		/*
+		 * free_by_rcu is only manipulated by irq work refill_work().
+		 * IRQ works on the same CPU are called sequentially, so it is
+		 * safe to use __llist_del_first() here. If alloc_bulk() is
+		 * invoked by the initial prefill, there will be no running
+		 * refill_work(), so __llist_del_first() is fine as well.
+		 *
+		 * In most cases, objects on free_by_rcu are from the same CPU.
+		 * If some objects come from other CPUs, it doesn't incur any
+		 * harm because NUMA_NO_NODE means the preference for current
+		 * numa node and it is not a guarantee.
+		 */
+		obj = __llist_del_first(&c->free_by_rcu);
+		if (!obj) {
+			obj = __alloc(c, node);
+			if (!obj)
+				break;
+		}
 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
 			/* In RT irq_work runs in per-cpu kthread, so disable
 			 * interrupts to avoid preemption and interrupts and