From patchwork Fri Dec 9 01:09:47 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hou Tao X-Patchwork-Id: 13069117 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79008C001B2 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 01:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229710AbiLIBJ7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:09:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51032 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229754AbiLIBJ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:09:58 -0500 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CAF183243; Thu, 8 Dec 2022 17:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.153]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NStGl6gqqz4f3pFy; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:09:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgB3m9jdipJjIEibBw--.55652S6; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 09:09:54 +0800 (CST) From: Hou Tao To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Martin KaFai Lau , Andrii Nakryiko , Song Liu , Hao Luo , Yonghong Song , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Jiri Olsa , John Fastabend , "Paul E . McKenney" , rcu@vger.kernel.org, houtao1@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Skip rcu_barrier() if rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() is true Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:09:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20221209010947.3130477-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 In-Reply-To: <20221209010947.3130477-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> References: <20221209010947.3130477-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgB3m9jdipJjIEibBw--.55652S6 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Aw1xCFWxJF4xuF1rArW7XFb_yoW8XFW5pa y2vFyUtr15uF45K3Zaqr1xAw4UAr9Yga17t3s7Wry8Zr1ayryDWrZFvry3XF1YyrZ5Ca4a yrnI9r15t3WUXaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUB0b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUXw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUFa9-UUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: xkrx3t3r6k3tpzhluzxrxghudrp/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org From: Hou Tao If there are pending rcu callback, free_mem_alloc() will use rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() and rcu_barrier() to wait for the pending __free_rcu_tasks_trace() and __free_rcu() callback. If rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() is true, there will be no pending __free_rcu(), so it will be OK to skip rcu_barrier() as well. Acked-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Hou Tao --- kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c index 04d96d1b98a3..ebcc3dd0fa19 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c @@ -464,9 +464,17 @@ static void free_mem_alloc(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma) { /* waiting_for_gp lists was drained, but __free_rcu might * still execute. Wait for it now before we freeing percpu caches. + * + * rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() doesn't imply synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace(), + * but rcu_barrier_tasks_trace() and rcu_barrier() below are only used + * to wait for the pending __free_rcu_tasks_trace() and __free_rcu(), + * so if call_rcu(head, __free_rcu) is skipped due to + * rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp(), it will be OK to skip rcu_barrier() by + * using rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() as well. */ rcu_barrier_tasks_trace(); - rcu_barrier(); + if (!rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp()) + rcu_barrier(); free_mem_alloc_no_barrier(ma); }