| Message ID | 20230316070936.733-1-adrianhuang0701@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 1848dfb5727ba92376e5dd337329ee75c34f5039 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/1] docs: RCU: typo fix | expand |
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:09:36PM +0800, Adrian Huang wrote: > From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com> > > It should be "Please note that ..." instead of "Please not that ...". > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> thanks, - Joel > --- > Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! > can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and > prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues. > > - Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > + Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > only in non-preemptible kernels. Such code can and will break, > especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y. > > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 03:09:36PM +0800, Adrian Huang wrote: > From: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com> > > It should be "Please note that ..." instead of "Please not that ...". > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang <ahuang12@lenovo.com> Good eyes, and thank you, but Qiuxu Zhuo beat you to this one. Please see this commit in the -rcu tree's "dev" branch: 3a554688b5c4 ("Documentation/RCU: s/not/note/ in checklist.rst") Thanx, Paul > --- > Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644 > --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! > can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and > prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues. > > - Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > + Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built > only in non-preemptible kernels. Such code can and will break, > especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y. > > -- > 2.34.1 >
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst index cc361fb01ed4..bd3c58c44bef 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst +++ b/Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome! can serve as rcu_read_lock_sched(), but is less readable and prevents lockdep from detecting locking issues. - Please not that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built + Please note that you *cannot* rely on code known to be built only in non-preemptible kernels. Such code can and will break, especially in kernels built with CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT=y.