From patchwork Fri Mar 17 03:13:36 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Boqun Feng X-Patchwork-Id: 13178490 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830D0C74A5B for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2023 03:15:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229874AbjCQDPV (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:15:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38110 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229608AbjCQDOJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:14:09 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82c.google.com (mail-qt1-x82c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC2E1CAE2; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 20:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82c.google.com with SMTP id r16so4338587qtx.9; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 20:13:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679022834; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:feedback-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lr+K/uboeCkCqHfD20mrlauFmTp3I14TicVqGgSXV88=; b=CCWsmXAZCxxzokyLycN9oF7fEn9KVBXw90UAFywsrDulUO+iiFO8duc63LMqPmW6CJ qxLqNzkNtWbQ4UuW1j05BAqZrfSFlMrHWDo7OwyiFyuYeuaJwBvVdHb5uDf+7kT4Koiv mmZM9lgaHCByu5UzloMekKPOBYRJVDVU7HM1rcs5X1qkXI2Zgf4AOv8VCfj5r/sdeF5/ cbrQcik2TmDCk4ok945ocXtZNCJL1CuK1dwLESXvsl9frGCDuXElUW5zE7TUNJ7CLmft 3rVX3p6PXQotiNjGdkR9NKXPDGaCNgL+UadZvfANcXeFWw9pOY+hIYUplIT0L5rysaqN 2Uow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679022834; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:feedback-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lr+K/uboeCkCqHfD20mrlauFmTp3I14TicVqGgSXV88=; b=NDTC+htSPKQCyxN6DISA+q+8FAyzzlW0iNdifKf6xF5zBQ56Yrwz1xHcF9yii3VGy3 roHuxJCax5eGTmLaR42sHxYxBh4umAiRvL6cIH5XzNs+whnobbppA++MH4X3yE9HYJNu nnmjjkc7npGfaRVxC8RaSMuB7jz9XzD0SCswK5geZ2Me8rqHQ3SBUE5A1I3Yn6Of8J18 KsAM/fsPB/silc9oXQOirMLu5fmX0iRlvlZdNBiBR7ke2kPTPwY9vy0Fqsx5ZJ5LgLrX u/pTZdTYAFaYyPVE45LF4YYEZkwMTDQ7NBSjvROhcWEGDF6b+ZFwuSq7STiN/zsfsUmr yZEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXQ6MDHOaqVprI3wXYb0lx2Mfy5Uf+UnBYFSKXcKMf5tyvbBMO8 vrbzW+QPpgD3fqdflkeZyYk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9GMbqn9Qc3NwBg/WGH3yAz/kg582FuwtZLIWUD1V59erPO6l0iBDXQx8kiJ4DiaRsBsWtdHg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:1714:b0:3bf:cb70:8a4f with SMTP id h20-20020a05622a171400b003bfcb708a4fmr10161511qtk.41.1679022833868; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 20:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com (auth2-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.228]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c2-20020a379a02000000b007436d0e9408sm786165qke.127.2023.03.16.20.13.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 20:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D941027C0054; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:13:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:13:52 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrvdefuddgheekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvvefufffkofgjfhgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepuehoqhhu nhcuhfgvnhhguceosghoqhhunhdrfhgvnhhgsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeegleejiedthedvheeggfejveefjeejkefgveffieeujefhueeigfegueeh geeggfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe gsohhquhhnodhmvghsmhhtphgruhhthhhpvghrshhonhgrlhhithihqdeiledvgeehtdei gedqudejjeekheehhedvqdgsohhquhhnrdhfvghngheppehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmsehfih igmhgvrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: iad51458e:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 23:13:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Boqun Feng To: rcu@vger.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , Waiman Long , Boqun Feng , Lai Jiangshan , "Paul E. McKenney" , Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Davidlohr Bueso , Frederic Weisbecker , Neeraj Upadhyay , Joel Fernandes , Shuah Khan , David Woodhouse , Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH rcu 4/7] locking/lockdep: Improve the deadlock scenario print for sync and read lock Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 20:13:36 -0700 Message-Id: <20230317031339.10277-5-boqun.feng@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20230317031339.10277-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> References: <20230317031339.10277-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: rcu@vger.kernel.org Lock scenario print is always a weak spot of lockdep splats. Improvement can be made if we rework the dependency search and the error printing. However without touching the graph search, we can improve a little for the circular deadlock case, since we have the to-be-added lock dependency, and know whether these two locks are read/write/sync. In order to know whether a held_lock is sync or not, a bit was "stolen" from ->references, which reduce our limit for the same lock class nesting from 2^12 to 2^11, and it should still be good enough. Besides, since we now have bit in held_lock for sync, we don't need the "hardirqoffs being 1" trick, and also we can avoid the __lock_release() if we jump out of __lock_acquire() before the held_lock stored. With these changes, a deadlock case evolved with read lock and sync gets a better print-out from: [...] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [...] [...] CPU0 CPU1 [...] ---- ---- [...] lock(srcuA); [...] lock(srcuB); [...] lock(srcuA); [...] lock(srcuB); to [...] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [...] [...] CPU0 CPU1 [...] ---- ---- [...] rlock(srcuA); [...] lock(srcuB); [...] lock(srcuA); [...] sync(srcuB); Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) --- include/linux/lockdep.h | 3 ++- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h index 14d9dbedc6c1..b32256e9e944 100644 --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h @@ -134,7 +134,8 @@ struct held_lock { unsigned int read:2; /* see lock_acquire() comment */ unsigned int check:1; /* see lock_acquire() comment */ unsigned int hardirqs_off:1; - unsigned int references:12; /* 32 bits */ + unsigned int sync:1; + unsigned int references:11; /* 32 bits */ unsigned int pin_count; }; diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index 36430cf8e407..dcd1d5bfc1e0 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -1881,6 +1881,8 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, struct lock_class *source = hlock_class(src); struct lock_class *target = hlock_class(tgt); struct lock_class *parent = prt->class; + int src_read = src->read; + int tgt_read = tgt->read; /* * A direct locking problem where unsafe_class lock is taken @@ -1908,7 +1910,10 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, printk(" Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n\n"); printk(" CPU0 CPU1\n"); printk(" ---- ----\n"); - printk(" lock("); + if (tgt_read != 0) + printk(" rlock("); + else + printk(" lock("); __print_lock_name(target); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk(" lock("); @@ -1917,7 +1922,12 @@ print_circular_lock_scenario(struct held_lock *src, printk(" lock("); __print_lock_name(target); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); - printk(" lock("); + if (src_read != 0) + printk(" rlock("); + else if (src->sync) + printk(" sync("); + else + printk(" lock("); __print_lock_name(source); printk(KERN_CONT ");\n"); printk("\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n\n"); @@ -4531,7 +4541,13 @@ mark_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *hlock, int check) return 0; } } - if (!hlock->hardirqs_off) { + + /* + * For lock_sync(), don't mark the ENABLED usage, since lock_sync() + * creates no critical section and no extra dependency can be introduced + * by interrupts + */ + if (!hlock->hardirqs_off && !hlock->sync) { if (hlock->read) { if (!mark_lock(curr, hlock, LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ)) @@ -4910,7 +4926,7 @@ static int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read); static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int trylock, int read, int check, int hardirqs_off, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip, - int references, int pin_count) + int references, int pin_count, int sync) { struct task_struct *curr = current; struct lock_class *class = NULL; @@ -4961,7 +4977,8 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, class_idx = class - lock_classes; - if (depth) { /* we're holding locks */ + if (depth && !sync) { + /* we're holding locks and the new held lock is not a sync */ hlock = curr->held_locks + depth - 1; if (hlock->class_idx == class_idx && nest_lock) { if (!references) @@ -4995,6 +5012,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, hlock->trylock = trylock; hlock->read = read; hlock->check = check; + hlock->sync = !!sync; hlock->hardirqs_off = !!hardirqs_off; hlock->references = references; #ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT @@ -5056,6 +5074,10 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, if (!validate_chain(curr, hlock, chain_head, chain_key)) return 0; + /* For lock_sync(), we are done here since no actual critical section */ + if (hlock->sync) + return 1; + curr->curr_chain_key = chain_key; curr->lockdep_depth++; check_chain_key(curr); @@ -5197,7 +5219,7 @@ static int reacquire_held_locks(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int depth, hlock->read, hlock->check, hlock->hardirqs_off, hlock->nest_lock, hlock->acquire_ip, - hlock->references, hlock->pin_count)) { + hlock->references, hlock->pin_count, 0)) { case 0: return 1; case 1: @@ -5667,7 +5689,7 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, lockdep_recursion_inc(); __lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check, - irqs_disabled_flags(flags), nest_lock, ip, 0, 0); + irqs_disabled_flags(flags), nest_lock, ip, 0, 0, 0); lockdep_recursion_finish(); raw_local_irq_restore(flags); } @@ -5700,11 +5722,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_release); * APIs are used to wait for one or multiple critical sections (on other CPUs * or threads), and it means that calling these APIs inside these critical * sections is potential deadlock. - * - * This annotation acts as an acqurie+release anontation pair with hardirqoff - * being 1. Since there's no critical section, no interrupt can create extra - * dependencies "inside" the annotation, hardirqoff == 1 allows us to avoid - * false positives. */ void lock_sync(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned subclass, int read, int check, struct lockdep_map *nest_lock, unsigned long ip) @@ -5718,10 +5735,9 @@ void lock_sync(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned subclass, int read, check_flags(flags); lockdep_recursion_inc(); - __lock_acquire(lock, subclass, 0, read, check, 1, nest_lock, ip, 0, 0); - - if (__lock_release(lock, ip)) - check_chain_key(current); + __lock_acquire(lock, subclass, 0, read, check, + irqs_disabled_flags(flags), nest_lock, ip, 0, 0, 1); + check_chain_key(current); lockdep_recursion_finish(); raw_local_irq_restore(flags); }