diff mbox series

[08/11] rcu/nocb: Remove halfway (de-)offloading handling from rcu_core

Message ID 20240816045608.30564-9-neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series Nocb updates for v6.12 | expand

Commit Message

Neeraj Upadhyay Aug. 16, 2024, 4:56 a.m. UTC 
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>

RCU core can't be running anymore while in the middle of (de-)offloading
since this sort of transition now only applies to offline CPUs.

The locked callback acceleration handling during the transition can
therefore be removed, along with concurrent batch execution.

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 26 ++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 60f271f5c079..1a272c678533 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2781,24 +2781,6 @@  static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = raw_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
-	/*
-	 * On RT rcu_core() can be preempted when IRQs aren't disabled.
-	 * Therefore this function can race with concurrent NOCB (de-)offloading
-	 * on this CPU and the below condition must be considered volatile.
-	 * However if we race with:
-	 *
-	 * _ Offloading:   In the worst case we accelerate or process callbacks
-	 *                 concurrently with NOCB kthreads. We are guaranteed to
-	 *                 call rcu_nocb_lock() if that happens.
-	 *
-	 * _ Deoffloading: In the worst case we miss callbacks acceleration or
-	 *                 processing. This is fine because the early stage
-	 *                 of deoffloading invokes rcu_core() after setting
-	 *                 SEGCBLIST_RCU_CORE. So we guarantee that we'll process
-	 *                 what could have been dismissed without the need to wait
-	 *                 for the next rcu_pending() check in the next jiffy.
-	 */
-	const bool do_batch = !rcu_segcblist_completely_offloaded(&rdp->cblist);
 
 	if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()))
 		return;
@@ -2818,17 +2800,17 @@  static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
 
 	/* No grace period and unregistered callbacks? */
 	if (!rcu_gp_in_progress() &&
-	    rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) && do_batch) {
-		rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
+	    rcu_segcblist_is_enabled(&rdp->cblist) && !rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp)) {
+		local_irq_save(flags);
 		if (!rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL))
 			rcu_accelerate_cbs_unlocked(rnp, rdp);
-		rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
+		local_irq_restore(flags);
 	}
 
 	rcu_check_gp_start_stall(rnp, rdp, rcu_jiffies_till_stall_check());
 
 	/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
-	if (do_batch && rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
+	if (!rcu_rdp_is_offloaded(rdp) && rcu_segcblist_ready_cbs(&rdp->cblist) &&
 	    likely(READ_ONCE(rcu_scheduler_fully_active))) {
 		rcu_do_batch(rdp);
 		/* Re-invoke RCU core processing if there are callbacks remaining. */