@@ -342,20 +342,24 @@ static void rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(unsigned long gp_seq)
struct rcu_node *rnp;
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rnp) {
- if (gp_seq != rcu_state.gp_seq) {
- pr_err("INFO: Stall ended during stack backtracing.\n");
- return;
- }
printk_deferred_enter();
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
- for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu)
+ for_each_leaf_node_possible_cpu(rnp, cpu) {
+ if (gp_seq != data_race(rcu_state.gp_seq)) {
+ printk_deferred_exit();
+ pr_err("INFO: Stall ended during stack backtracing.\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ if (!(data_race(rnp->qsmask) & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)))
+ continue;
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
if (rnp->qsmask & leaf_node_cpu_bit(rnp, cpu)) {
if (cpu_is_offline(cpu))
pr_err("Offline CPU %d blocking current GP.\n", cpu);
else
dump_cpu_task(cpu);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ }
printk_deferred_exit();
}
}
This commit pushes the grace-period-end checks further down into rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(), and also uses lockless checks coupled with finer-grained locking. The result is that the current leaf rcu_node structure's ->lock is acquired only if a stack backtrace might be needed from the current CPU, and is held across only that CPU's backtrace. As a result, if there are no stalled CPUs associated with a given rcu_node structure, then its ->lock will not be acquired at all. On large systems, it is usually (though not always) the case that a small number of CPUs are stalling the current grace period, which means that the ->lock need be acquired only for a small fraction of the rcu_node structures. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> --- kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)