diff mbox series

selinux: Fix strncpy in libselinux and libsepol

Message ID 20190531151609.16873-1-richard_c_haines@btinternet.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series selinux: Fix strncpy in libselinux and libsepol | expand

Commit Message

Richard Haines May 31, 2019, 3:16 p.m. UTC 
When building with gcc9, get build errors such as:

genbools.c:24:2: error: ‘strncpy’ output may be truncated copying 8191
bytes from a string of length 8191 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
   24 |  strncpy(dest, ptr, size);
      |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
---
 libselinux/src/booleans.c |  4 ++--
 libsepol/src/genbools.c   | 20 +++++++++++---------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Comments

Stephen Smalley May 31, 2019, 7:35 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 5/31/19 11:16 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
> When building with gcc9, get build errors such as:
> 
> genbools.c:24:2: error: ‘strncpy’ output may be truncated copying 8191
> bytes from a string of length 8191 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
>     24 |  strncpy(dest, ptr, size);
>        |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It would be nice if we could just remove all of this code, modulo 
ABI/API concerns (maybe we could reduce the public interfaces to 
no-ops?).  It is all legacy code I think, predating kernel 2.6.22 
(kernel automatically preserves boolean values across policy reload) and 
the use of libsemanage (managed policy, persistent boolean changes 
directly applied to the kernel policy file).  Probably not used by 
anything later than RHEL 4, which should be dead and gone by now I hope.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
> ---
>   libselinux/src/booleans.c |  4 ++--
>   libsepol/src/genbools.c   | 20 +++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/libselinux/src/booleans.c b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
> index ab1e0754..cdc03517 100644
> --- a/libselinux/src/booleans.c
> +++ b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ int security_load_booleans(char *path)
>   
>   	__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
>   	while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
> -		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, sizeof(name), &val);
> +		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);

This might fix the warning but is it correct? len is the size of the 
buffer allocated by getline, which could be larger or smaller than 
sizeof name and also could be larger than the number of bytes read. 
process_boolean() seems to want the size of the name buffer as a bound 
for strncpy() in the strtrim() call. strtrim() also seems to be using it 
wrongly as a bound for the source aka name1, presuming they are the same 
size.

>   		if (ret == -1)
>   			errors++;
>   		if (ret == 1)
> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ int security_load_booleans(char *path)
>   		int ret;
>   		__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
>   		while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
> -			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, sizeof(name), &val);
> +			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);

Ditto.

>   			if (ret == -1)
>   				errors++;
>   			if (ret == 1)
> diff --git a/libsepol/src/genbools.c b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
> index d4a2df62..ad194ca6 100644
> --- a/libsepol/src/genbools.c
> +++ b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>   #include "private.h"
>   #include "dso.h"
>   
> +#define FGET_BUFSIZ 255
> +
>   /* -- Deprecated -- */
>   
>   static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source, int size)
> @@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source, int size)
>   
>   static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char *name, int namesize, int *val)
>   {
> -	char name1[BUFSIZ];
> +	char name1[FGET_BUFSIZ];
>   	char *ptr = NULL;
>   	char *tok;
>   
> @@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char *name, int namesize, int *val)
>   		ERR(NULL, "illegal boolean definition %s", buffer);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> -	strncpy(name1, tok, BUFSIZ - 1);
> +	strncpy(name1, tok, FGET_BUFSIZ - 1);
>   	strtrim(name, name1, namesize - 1);
>   
>   	tok = strtok_r(NULL, "\0", &ptr);
> @@ -79,8 +81,8 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb *policydb, const char *path,
>   {
>   	FILE *boolf;
>   	char *buffer = NULL;
> -	char localbools[BUFSIZ];
> -	char name[BUFSIZ];
> +	char localbools[FGET_BUFSIZ];
> +	char name[FGET_BUFSIZ + 1];

Similarly seems to be making faulty assumptions about using the same 
buffer sizes throughout.

>   	int val;
>   	int errors = 0, changes = 0;
>   	struct cond_bool_datum *datum;
> @@ -90,12 +92,12 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb *policydb, const char *path,
>   		goto localbool;
>   
>   #ifdef __APPLE__
> -        if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(255 * sizeof(char))) == NULL) {
> -          ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
> -	  return -1;
> +	if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(FGET_BUFSIZ * sizeof(char))) == NULL) {
> +		ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
> +		return -1;
>   	}
>   
> -        while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
> +	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {

I think this was just a hack to make it build on macOS for Android.  But 
there is no reason for this code to be used there.  I wouldn't change 
the other buffer sizes to match.

>   #else
>   	size_t size = 0;
>   	while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {
> @@ -124,7 +126,7 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb *policydb, const char *path,
>   
>   #ifdef __APPLE__
>   
> -	  while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
> +	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {
>   #else
>   
>   	    while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {
>
Richard Haines June 2, 2019, 1:35 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 15:35 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 5/31/19 11:16 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
> > When building with gcc9, get build errors such as:
> > 
> > genbools.c:24:2: error: ‘strncpy’ output may be truncated copying
> > 8191
> > bytes from a string of length 8191 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
> >     24 |  strncpy(dest, ptr, size);
> >        |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> It would be nice if we could just remove all of this code, modulo 
> ABI/API concerns (maybe we could reduce the public interfaces to 
> no-ops?).  It is all legacy code I think, predating kernel 2.6.22 
> (kernel automatically preserves boolean values across policy reload)
> and 
> the use of libsemanage (managed policy, persistent boolean changes 
> directly applied to the kernel policy file).  Probably not used by 
> anything later than RHEL 4, which should be dead and gone by now I
> hope.

Any comments on this list:

libsepol/src/genusers.c
	delete file + cleanup

libsepol/src/genbools.c
	delete file + cleanup

libselinux/src/load_policy.c
Remove areas that use:
	genbools_array
	genusers
	genbools
	setlocaldefs
	preservebools

libselinux/src/booleans.c
no-op:
	security_load_booleans()

modify as no need for "int permanent":
	security_set_boolean_list()

libselinux/src/selinux_config.c
Remove:
	SETLOCALDEFS

Clean up any leftovers (man pages etc.)


> 
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
> > ---
> >   libselinux/src/booleans.c |  4 ++--
> >   libsepol/src/genbools.c   | 20 +++++++++++---------
> >   2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/libselinux/src/booleans.c b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
> > index ab1e0754..cdc03517 100644
> > --- a/libselinux/src/booleans.c
> > +++ b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
> > @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ int security_load_booleans(char *path)
> >   
> >   	__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
> >   	while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
> > -		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, sizeof(name),
> > &val);
> > +		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);
> 
> This might fix the warning but is it correct? len is the size of the 
> buffer allocated by getline, which could be larger or smaller than 
> sizeof name and also could be larger than the number of bytes read. 
> process_boolean() seems to want the size of the name buffer as a
> bound 
> for strncpy() in the strtrim() call. strtrim() also seems to be using
> it 
> wrongly as a bound for the source aka name1, presuming they are the
> same 
> size.
> 
Sent a V2 patch that I hope fixes these.

> >   		if (ret == -1)
> >   			errors++;
> >   		if (ret == 1)
> > @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ int security_load_booleans(char *path)
> >   		int ret;
> >   		__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
> >   		while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
> > -			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name,
> > sizeof(name), &val);
> > +			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);
> 
> Ditto.
> 
> >   			if (ret == -1)
> >   				errors++;
> >   			if (ret == 1)
> > diff --git a/libsepol/src/genbools.c b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
> > index d4a2df62..ad194ca6 100644
> > --- a/libsepol/src/genbools.c
> > +++ b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> >   #include "private.h"
> >   #include "dso.h"
> >   
> > +#define FGET_BUFSIZ 255
> > +
> >   /* -- Deprecated -- */
> >   
> >   static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source, int size)
> > @@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source,
> > int size)
> >   
> >   static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char *name, int
> > namesize, int *val)
> >   {
> > -	char name1[BUFSIZ];
> > +	char name1[FGET_BUFSIZ];
> >   	char *ptr = NULL;
> >   	char *tok;
> >   
> > @@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char
> > *name, int namesize, int *val)
> >   		ERR(NULL, "illegal boolean definition %s", buffer);
> >   		return -1;
> >   	}
> > -	strncpy(name1, tok, BUFSIZ - 1);
> > +	strncpy(name1, tok, FGET_BUFSIZ - 1);
> >   	strtrim(name, name1, namesize - 1);
> >   
> >   	tok = strtok_r(NULL, "\0", &ptr);
> > @@ -79,8 +81,8 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb
> > *policydb, const char *path,
> >   {
> >   	FILE *boolf;
> >   	char *buffer = NULL;
> > -	char localbools[BUFSIZ];
> > -	char name[BUFSIZ];
> > +	char localbools[FGET_BUFSIZ];
> > +	char name[FGET_BUFSIZ + 1];
> 
> Similarly seems to be making faulty assumptions about using the same 
> buffer sizes throughout.
> 
> >   	int val;
> >   	int errors = 0, changes = 0;
> >   	struct cond_bool_datum *datum;
> > @@ -90,12 +92,12 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb
> > *policydb, const char *path,
> >   		goto localbool;
> >   
> >   #ifdef __APPLE__
> > -        if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(255 * sizeof(char))) == NULL)
> > {
> > -          ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
> > -	  return -1;
> > +	if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(FGET_BUFSIZ * sizeof(char))) ==
> > NULL) {
> > +		ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
> > +		return -1;
> >   	}
> >   
> > -        while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
> > +	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {
> 
> I think this was just a hack to make it build on macOS for
> Android.  But 
> there is no reason for this code to be used there.  I wouldn't
> change 
> the other buffer sizes to match.
> 
> >   #else
> >   	size_t size = 0;
> >   	while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {
> > @@ -124,7 +126,7 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb
> > *policydb, const char *path,
> >   
> >   #ifdef __APPLE__
> >   
> > -	  while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
> > +	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {
> >   #else
> >   
> >   	    while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {
> >
Stephen Smalley June 3, 2019, 8:43 p.m. UTC | #3 
On 6/2/19 9:35 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 15:35 -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> On 5/31/19 11:16 AM, Richard Haines wrote:
>>> When building with gcc9, get build errors such as:
>>>
>>> genbools.c:24:2: error: ‘strncpy’ output may be truncated copying
>>> 8191
>>> bytes from a string of length 8191 [-Werror=stringop-truncation]
>>>      24 |  strncpy(dest, ptr, size);
>>>         |  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> It would be nice if we could just remove all of this code, modulo
>> ABI/API concerns (maybe we could reduce the public interfaces to
>> no-ops?).  It is all legacy code I think, predating kernel 2.6.22
>> (kernel automatically preserves boolean values across policy reload)
>> and
>> the use of libsemanage (managed policy, persistent boolean changes
>> directly applied to the kernel policy file).  Probably not used by
>> anything later than RHEL 4, which should be dead and gone by now I
>> hope.
> 
> Any comments on this list:
> 
> libsepol/src/genusers.c
> 	delete file + cleanup
> 
> libsepol/src/genbools.c
> 	delete file + cleanup
> 
> libselinux/src/load_policy.c
> Remove areas that use:
> 	genbools_array
> 	genusers
> 	genbools
> 	setlocaldefs
> 	preservebools
> 
> libselinux/src/booleans.c
> no-op:
> 	security_load_booleans()
> 
> modify as no need for "int permanent":
> 	security_set_boolean_list()

Yes, we'd keep the argument to preserve API/ABI but drop the code 
handling permanent == 1.  The callers were already updated to use 
libsemanage instead for saving persistent booleans.

> 
> libselinux/src/selinux_config.c
> Remove:
> 	SETLOCALDEFS
> 
> Clean up any leftovers (man pages etc.)

FWIW, see 
https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/1177594803.24282.322.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil/

It never landed upstream since policyrep never merged to master.
Picked up again here:
https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/1201203958.21288.120.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil/

But RHEL4 was still a concern, so we fell back to just this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/1202311592.27371.150.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil/

I'm hoping we can remove it all now finally.

> 
> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Richard Haines <richard_c_haines@btinternet.com>
>>> ---
>>>    libselinux/src/booleans.c |  4 ++--
>>>    libsepol/src/genbools.c   | 20 +++++++++++---------
>>>    2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libselinux/src/booleans.c b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
>>> index ab1e0754..cdc03517 100644
>>> --- a/libselinux/src/booleans.c
>>> +++ b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
>>> @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ int security_load_booleans(char *path)
>>>    
>>>    	__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
>>>    	while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
>>> -		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, sizeof(name),
>>> &val);
>>> +		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);
>>
>> This might fix the warning but is it correct? len is the size of the
>> buffer allocated by getline, which could be larger or smaller than
>> sizeof name and also could be larger than the number of bytes read.
>> process_boolean() seems to want the size of the name buffer as a
>> bound
>> for strncpy() in the strtrim() call. strtrim() also seems to be using
>> it
>> wrongly as a bound for the source aka name1, presuming they are the
>> same
>> size.
>>
> Sent a V2 patch that I hope fixes these.
> 
>>>    		if (ret == -1)
>>>    			errors++;
>>>    		if (ret == 1)
>>> @@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ int security_load_booleans(char *path)
>>>    		int ret;
>>>    		__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
>>>    		while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
>>> -			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name,
>>> sizeof(name), &val);
>>> +			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);
>>
>> Ditto.
>>
>>>    			if (ret == -1)
>>>    				errors++;
>>>    			if (ret == 1)
>>> diff --git a/libsepol/src/genbools.c b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
>>> index d4a2df62..ad194ca6 100644
>>> --- a/libsepol/src/genbools.c
>>> +++ b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
>>> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
>>>    #include "private.h"
>>>    #include "dso.h"
>>>    
>>> +#define FGET_BUFSIZ 255
>>> +
>>>    /* -- Deprecated -- */
>>>    
>>>    static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source, int size)
>>> @@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source,
>>> int size)
>>>    
>>>    static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char *name, int
>>> namesize, int *val)
>>>    {
>>> -	char name1[BUFSIZ];
>>> +	char name1[FGET_BUFSIZ];
>>>    	char *ptr = NULL;
>>>    	char *tok;
>>>    
>>> @@ -48,7 +50,7 @@ static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char
>>> *name, int namesize, int *val)
>>>    		ERR(NULL, "illegal boolean definition %s", buffer);
>>>    		return -1;
>>>    	}
>>> -	strncpy(name1, tok, BUFSIZ - 1);
>>> +	strncpy(name1, tok, FGET_BUFSIZ - 1);
>>>    	strtrim(name, name1, namesize - 1);
>>>    
>>>    	tok = strtok_r(NULL, "\0", &ptr);
>>> @@ -79,8 +81,8 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb
>>> *policydb, const char *path,
>>>    {
>>>    	FILE *boolf;
>>>    	char *buffer = NULL;
>>> -	char localbools[BUFSIZ];
>>> -	char name[BUFSIZ];
>>> +	char localbools[FGET_BUFSIZ];
>>> +	char name[FGET_BUFSIZ + 1];
>>
>> Similarly seems to be making faulty assumptions about using the same
>> buffer sizes throughout.
>>
>>>    	int val;
>>>    	int errors = 0, changes = 0;
>>>    	struct cond_bool_datum *datum;
>>> @@ -90,12 +92,12 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb
>>> *policydb, const char *path,
>>>    		goto localbool;
>>>    
>>>    #ifdef __APPLE__
>>> -        if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(255 * sizeof(char))) == NULL)
>>> {
>>> -          ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
>>> -	  return -1;
>>> +	if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(FGET_BUFSIZ * sizeof(char))) ==
>>> NULL) {
>>> +		ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
>>> +		return -1;
>>>    	}
>>>    
>>> -        while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
>>> +	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {
>>
>> I think this was just a hack to make it build on macOS for
>> Android.  But
>> there is no reason for this code to be used there.  I wouldn't
>> change
>> the other buffer sizes to match.
>>
>>>    #else
>>>    	size_t size = 0;
>>>    	while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {
>>> @@ -124,7 +126,7 @@ static int load_booleans(struct policydb
>>> *policydb, const char *path,
>>>    
>>>    #ifdef __APPLE__
>>>    
>>> -	  while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
>>> +	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {
>>>    #else
>>>    
>>>    	    while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {
>>>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/libselinux/src/booleans.c b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
index ab1e0754..cdc03517 100644
--- a/libselinux/src/booleans.c
+++ b/libselinux/src/booleans.c
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@  int security_load_booleans(char *path)
 
 	__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
 	while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
-		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, sizeof(name), &val);
+		int ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);
 		if (ret == -1)
 			errors++;
 		if (ret == 1)
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@  int security_load_booleans(char *path)
 		int ret;
 		__fsetlocking(boolf, FSETLOCKING_BYCALLER);
 		while (getline(&inbuf, &len, boolf) > 0) {
-			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, sizeof(name), &val);
+			ret = process_boolean(inbuf, name, len, &val);
 			if (ret == -1)
 				errors++;
 			if (ret == 1)
diff --git a/libsepol/src/genbools.c b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
index d4a2df62..ad194ca6 100644
--- a/libsepol/src/genbools.c
+++ b/libsepol/src/genbools.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ 
 #include "private.h"
 #include "dso.h"
 
+#define FGET_BUFSIZ 255
+
 /* -- Deprecated -- */
 
 static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source, int size)
@@ -32,7 +34,7 @@  static char *strtrim(char *dest, char *source, int size)
 
 static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char *name, int namesize, int *val)
 {
-	char name1[BUFSIZ];
+	char name1[FGET_BUFSIZ];
 	char *ptr = NULL;
 	char *tok;
 
@@ -48,7 +50,7 @@  static int process_boolean(char *buffer, char *name, int namesize, int *val)
 		ERR(NULL, "illegal boolean definition %s", buffer);
 		return -1;
 	}
-	strncpy(name1, tok, BUFSIZ - 1);
+	strncpy(name1, tok, FGET_BUFSIZ - 1);
 	strtrim(name, name1, namesize - 1);
 
 	tok = strtok_r(NULL, "\0", &ptr);
@@ -79,8 +81,8 @@  static int load_booleans(struct policydb *policydb, const char *path,
 {
 	FILE *boolf;
 	char *buffer = NULL;
-	char localbools[BUFSIZ];
-	char name[BUFSIZ];
+	char localbools[FGET_BUFSIZ];
+	char name[FGET_BUFSIZ + 1];
 	int val;
 	int errors = 0, changes = 0;
 	struct cond_bool_datum *datum;
@@ -90,12 +92,12 @@  static int load_booleans(struct policydb *policydb, const char *path,
 		goto localbool;
 
 #ifdef __APPLE__
-        if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(255 * sizeof(char))) == NULL) {
-          ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
-	  return -1;
+	if ((buffer = (char *)malloc(FGET_BUFSIZ * sizeof(char))) == NULL) {
+		ERR(NULL, "out of memory");
+		return -1;
 	}
 
-        while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
+	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {
 #else
 	size_t size = 0;
 	while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {
@@ -124,7 +126,7 @@  static int load_booleans(struct policydb *policydb, const char *path,
 
 #ifdef __APPLE__
 
-	  while(fgets(buffer, 255, boolf) != NULL) {
+	while (fgets(buffer, FGET_BUFSIZ, boolf) != NULL) {
 #else
 
 	    while (getline(&buffer, &size, boolf) > 0) {