From patchwork Mon Dec 16 22:33:32 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Casey Schaufler X-Patchwork-Id: 11296053 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22A76C1 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3AA2053B for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com header.i=@yahoo.com header.b="RNjSPEhj" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727773AbfLPWer (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:34:47 -0500 Received: from sonic306-28.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.189.90]:41382 "EHLO sonic306-28.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727728AbfLPWeq (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:34:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1576535683; bh=vAY+BSSlZvLKw6BmZsbfSaSyBBrsJ1eETqHGtnGVNto=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=RNjSPEhj4dUwG/bZfQTuln0lMFONSbbwIiJGU5Mqh7IUaM8vhGJS/OJdjy5bT5lwrI6FJq0nCEd7rXFx/Qj4acMDSMK6YGOFV16M14a1PBBAMjpZZmzvjmPXjXC1C3/0ftHV77KsVrlQE+16vRSvkQcdV7iixpYblBBEVImXEssUbukawkoNiuta0M1Ca1CNLEWelvrvbYI3wZyIAHNKCwzaYrsRkJV20Gf6GbwExnLyD3ruHtpQqXYM7gqSj/p61vPSP9Rg2tgN1EQPI6aBktmYGwdgRXgHADqRS2pBM6EGz3WSPZ+UiNkBkHfE4A92hJBNFG1L/LnxOC8rYComHQ== X-YMail-OSG: cNyOXlQVM1muBjq88liMTevaBYzF6cyb9OZ_.oxSFzFcyLRuuqL1mL2ChdVZxct 95N7axVwGwC.l.C5JBVbPCT1_pmk83aLNdH32_Z3CyRxDktDmpKNeGROZeXY1cuzcI2HXw0trwhQ 2EaCAl1xGUQk6MXTpDi7gG4xUWtOw0Vn.I4suOyULavGwPyPNUlkYKpMof778JGyqVWcRC8U4co4 RM5SqN48FS8zSltchRCNAC4tf9JcGZmqhzAaZSlsKzQEHdofsXTHOlmFvZ2mytfWRyp7RTwwL1hZ LzKfx3owzWUbTdNkoEst.jSjUkUKE.7y04H0H.ncxVrJl7x4vhzVd.o2_VpVEaUxc_xyJQ3PBZDC L273raDNFJhgwJ2gYlBGw4Z2lzWD_P7sQgAmojQFBXz4nbhM7bxMkL5ZaWxkaxT7TSrl9lcLBgDf 3coCQy42.psGbQa9LsSFSDtI.6RPn.kSkOK2biSonCnzdf_S0mE18SoToRNQOdg.Z9Yl7P0HrqcG VRKNB0L0Iwoz8yMI2MhiAht7Gt_hzcawcuKRghkU82R6Wr7pb.pGXvc2xHfaPUO5ZDi759b7SnRw 4TCrjoVhHnz1RPV7fasrmwSYW00PLU0Jj7OYGipokHgtyGlGXzI_8fWKt_kloNNJQLjVkGjv.Obl WkznV2OM9ZNeIWUIyRmbmNvVxNmTGnUUsazuuhDpy3yWCgnCeFa3MaWazi4OoOWp_lNZ_1v1wa.J hZbV61fTF4U5C_Q1TbmIOiZKSbtcQLuZwchfTRgIturbRkdQ3Ffjj_.g3uKfJdwT6s2rqt7Hg5Fo YmSALtOV9C13DS1P.7hLu6KF09p_l449bpLsk7gTURcDZYC6m6BMH4SCqvJnhy_.arqQILHcp2OL 1eAVJlK_cKeDk_wtAklF64C6k7Pqfk7eEPpYU9g_fd_uSrul96xN9I0xTx3IWHA.szzcPihfASab OhwjjcWYroy31BoVHI5DaXtuu_rO9JtKMsleKaCtb1x_PTm0N.LQqwQ7Pb80Im1ALdT9F86Wf4BJ j3z_7mvryiwIqJ1Iu8E5iP85WsfMnm7zI2hUkW0hcedvueJqd7dIwOeWLFvEIOL0kgljLw9AGSuO cBg4CbHRJnrMXkKpneQwZGMUf_bumBxgCx0UWjdFVE2c08OFAxu_jmD1rejvs81XbWVM_2.ohWdu Ig2TEkgs335d9fUb5YR2TIZsRg1OOQZDHNUskzseM4FmhnEuZS1LFdBApuGqghS8svC5jWSEwZQa 1ltHZPVN3J8GyfcoGaOK7eGMSRGogVOrWpGXqZn542e8gaolVDlYV8t0rq2.RsZQGdL6SS2JdZkg IKyKE1rkitdM.RP81OxjEr134mDGJ7KjjjVMbU73M95M87oxspEu25n_SooUomWAex16Gvqe3G_9 ToVxt0dB2mZY8CTx5rMDxtj4kUi71mnUfd4E6Mwy54VegNClcEFTnUnP5rZxqqLdQKD4EzTw6SQ- - Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:34:43 +0000 Received: by smtp402.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 521dcbc8e4baff33d92f27a3b49b3d9a; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 22:34:39 +0000 (UTC) From: Casey Schaufler To: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org Cc: keescook@chromium.org, john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov Subject: [PATCH v12 12/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 14:33:32 -0800 Message-Id: <20191216223345.5066-13-casey@schaufler-ca.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191216223345.5066-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> References: <20191216223345.5066-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: selinux-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: selinux@vger.kernel.org The IMA interfaces ima_get_action() and ima_match_policy() call LSM functions that use lsmblobs. Change the IMA functions to pass the lsmblob to be compatible with the LSM functions. Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: John Johansen Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org --- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 11 ++++----- security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 10 ++++----- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 4 +--- security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 32 +++++++++++---------------- security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 12 +++++----- 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index d95b0ece7434..96b6662ea39f 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ extern const char *const func_tokens[]; struct modsig; /* LIM API function definitions */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc); +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc); int ima_must_measure(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func); int ima_collect_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, @@ -232,8 +232,9 @@ void ima_free_template_entry(struct ima_template_entry *entry); const char *ima_d_path(const struct path *path, char **pathbuf, char *filename); /* IMA policy related functions */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc); void ima_init_policy(void); void ima_update_policy(void); diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c index 610759fe63b8..1ab769fa7df6 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * ima_get_action - appraise & measure decision based on policy. * @inode: pointer to inode to measure * @cred: pointer to credentials structure to validate - * @secid: secid of the task being validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task being validated * @mask: contains the permission mask (MAY_READ, MAY_WRITE, MAY_EXEC, * MAY_APPEND) * @func: caller identifier @@ -181,15 +181,15 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, * Returns IMA_MEASURE, IMA_APPRAISE mask. * */ -int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - int mask, enum ima_hooks func, int *pcr, - struct ima_template_desc **template_desc) +int ima_get_action(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, int mask, enum ima_hooks func, + int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc) { int flags = IMA_MEASURE | IMA_AUDIT | IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH; flags &= ima_policy_flag; - return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, secid, func, mask, flags, pcr, + return ima_match_policy(inode, cred, blob, func, mask, flags, pcr, template_desc); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 69e549164949..01c755a242ac 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -48,15 +48,13 @@ bool is_ima_appraise_enabled(void) */ int ima_must_appraise(struct inode *inode, int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { - u32 secid; struct lsmblob blob; if (!ima_appraise) return 0; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - lsmblob_secid(&blob, &secid); - return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), secid, func, mask, + return ima_match_policy(inode, current_cred(), &blob, func, mask, IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_HASH, NULL, NULL); } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c index c8e3e234d446..86cc1419587e 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c @@ -190,8 +190,8 @@ void ima_file_free(struct file *file) } static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, - u32 secid, char *buf, loff_t size, int mask, - enum ima_hooks func) + struct lsmblob *blob, char *buf, loff_t size, + int mask, enum ima_hooks func) { struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); struct integrity_iint_cache *iint = NULL; @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int process_measurement(struct file *file, const struct cred *cred, * bitmask based on the appraise/audit/measurement policy. * Included is the appraise submask. */ - action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, secid, mask, func, &pcr, + action = ima_get_action(inode, cred, blob, mask, func, &pcr, &template_desc); violation_check = ((func == FILE_CHECK || func == MMAP_CHECK) && (ima_policy_flag & IMA_MEASURE)); @@ -388,8 +388,7 @@ int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot) if (file && (prot & PROT_EXEC)) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding - until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, MMAP_CHECK); } @@ -415,16 +414,14 @@ int ima_bprm_check(struct linux_binprm *bprm) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); + ret = process_measurement(bprm->file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, BPRM_CHECK); if (ret) return ret; security_cred_getsecid(bprm->cred, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, blob.secid[0], - NULL, 0, MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); + return process_measurement(bprm->file, bprm->cred, &blob, NULL, 0, + MAY_EXEC, CREDS_CHECK); } /** @@ -442,8 +439,7 @@ int ima_file_check(struct file *file, int mask) struct lsmblob blob; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], NULL, 0, + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, NULL, 0, mask & (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_EXEC | MAY_APPEND), FILE_CHECK); } @@ -575,9 +571,8 @@ int ima_post_read_file(struct file *file, void *buf, loff_t size, func = read_idmap[read_id] ?: FILE_CHECK; security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding until process_measurement changes */ - return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], buf, - size, MAY_READ, func); + return process_measurement(file, current_cred(), &blob, buf, size, + MAY_READ, func); } /** @@ -669,9 +664,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size, */ if (func) { security_task_getsecid(current, &blob); - /* scaffolding */ - action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), blob.secid[0], - 0, func, &pcr, &template); + action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), &blob, 0, func, + &pcr, &template); if (!(action & IMA_MEASURE)) return; } diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c index c7d2ea47a326..b089d4a8b27b 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ int ima_lsm_policy_change(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, * Returns true on rule match, false on failure. */ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, - const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, + const struct cred *cred, struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask) { int i; @@ -431,7 +431,6 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode, case LSM_SUBJ_USER: case LSM_SUBJ_ROLE: case LSM_SUBJ_TYPE: - lsmblob_init(&blob, secid); rc = security_filter_rule_match(&blob, rule->lsm[i].type, Audit_equal, @@ -475,7 +474,7 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * @inode: pointer to an inode for which the policy decision is being made * @cred: pointer to a credentials structure for which the policy decision is * being made - * @secid: LSM secid of the task to be validated + * @blob: LSM data of the task to be validated * @func: IMA hook identifier * @mask: requested action (MAY_READ | MAY_WRITE | MAY_APPEND | MAY_EXEC) * @pcr: set the pcr to extend @@ -488,8 +487,9 @@ static int get_subaction(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, enum ima_hooks func) * list when walking it. Reads are many orders of magnitude more numerous * than writes so ima_match_policy() is classical RCU candidate. */ -int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, - enum ima_hooks func, int mask, int flags, int *pcr, +int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, + struct lsmblob *blob, enum ima_hooks func, int mask, + int flags, int *pcr, struct ima_template_desc **template_desc) { struct ima_rule_entry *entry; @@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ int ima_match_policy(struct inode *inode, const struct cred *cred, u32 secid, if (!(entry->action & actmask)) continue; - if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, secid, func, mask)) + if (!ima_match_rules(entry, inode, cred, blob, func, mask)) continue; action |= entry->flags & IMA_ACTION_FLAGS;