Message ID | 20210330173920.281531-10-jwcart2@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | Update checks for invalid rules in blocks | expand |
diff --git a/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c b/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c index 1fef25d4..df7bb950 100644 --- a/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c +++ b/libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c @@ -6130,7 +6130,8 @@ int __cil_build_ast_node_helper(struct cil_tree_node *parse_current, uint32_t *f } if (in != NULL) { - if (parse_current->data == CIL_KEY_IN) { + if (parse_current->data == CIL_KEY_TUNABLE || + parse_current->data == CIL_KEY_IN) { rc = SEPOL_ERR; cil_tree_log(parse_current, CIL_ERR, "Found in-statement"); cil_log(CIL_ERR, "in-statements cannot be defined within in-statements\n");
Since tunableifs are resolved before in-statements, do not allow tuanble declarations in in-statements. Since in-statements are the first flavor of statement that causes part of the AST to be copied to another part, there is no need to check the in-statements when resolving the AST. Signed-off-by: James Carter <jwcart2@gmail.com> --- libsepol/cil/src/cil_build_ast.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)