| Message ID | 20230906102557.3432236-1-alpic@google.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Paul Moore |
| Headers | show |
| Series | SELinux: Check correct permissions for FS_IOC32_* | expand |
diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c index d06e350fedee..bba83f437a1d 100644 --- a/security/selinux/hooks.c +++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c @@ -3644,11 +3644,15 @@ static int selinux_file_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, case FIGETBSZ: case FS_IOC_GETFLAGS: case FS_IOC_GETVERSION: + case FS_IOC32_GETFLAGS: + case FS_IOC32_GETVERSION: error = file_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__GETATTR); break; case FS_IOC_SETFLAGS: case FS_IOC_SETVERSION: + case FS_IOC32_SETFLAGS: + case FS_IOC32_SETVERSION: error = file_has_perm(cred, file, FILE__SETATTR); break;
Some ioctl commands do not require ioctl permission, but are routed to other permissions such as FILE_GETATTR or FILE_SETATTR. This routing is done by comparing the ioctl cmd to a set of 64-bit flags (FS_IOC_*). However, if a 32-bit process is running on a 64-bit kernel, it emmits 32-bit flags (FS_IOC32_*) for certain ioctl operations. These flags are being checked erroneoulsy, which leads to these ioctl operations being routed to the ioctl permission, rather than the correct file permissions. Two possible solutions exist: - Trim parameter "cmd" to a u16 so that only the last two bytes are checked in the case statement. - Explicitily add the FS_IOC32_* codes to the case statement. Solution 2 was chosen because it is a minimal explicit change. Solution 1 is a more elegant change, but is less explicit, as the switch statement appears to only check the FS_IOC_* codes upon first reading. Fixes: 0b24dcb7f2f7 ("Revert "selinux: simplify ioctl checking"") Signed-off-by: Alfred Piccioni <alpic@google.com> --- security/selinux/hooks.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) base-commit: 50a510a78287c15cee644f345ef8bac8977986a7