diff mbox

spi: spi-mpc52xx.c: Init bus_num to 0 as this driver only supports one bus

Message ID 1353924587-31339-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Stefan Roese Nov. 26, 2012, 10:09 a.m. UTC
By setting bus_num to 0 the resulting device is named "spi0". Otherwise
the name was "spi32766" (dynamic numbering) which was a bit confusing.

Using 0 is correct as this driver (and the MPC5200 SPI controller) only
supports one SPI bus.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca
---
 drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Grant Likely Dec. 6, 2012, 2:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:09:47 +0100, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> By setting bus_num to 0 the resulting device is named "spi0". Otherwise
> the name was "spi32766" (dynamic numbering) which was a bit confusing.
> 
> Using 0 is correct as this driver (and the MPC5200 SPI controller) only
> supports one SPI bus.

But the chip has multiple SPI busses. If the psc spi bus gets probed
first, then there will be a number conflict.

g.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
> Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>
> Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> index 0454106..b40370c 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
> @@ -438,6 +438,9 @@ static int __devinit mpc52xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *op)
>  	master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_LSB_FIRST;
>  	master->dev.of_node = op->dev.of_node;
>  
> +	/* Only one SPI bus from this driver possible */
> +	master->bus_num = 0;
> +
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&op->dev, master);
>  
>  	ms = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
> -- 
> 1.8.0
>
Stefan Roese Dec. 6, 2012, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #2
On 12/06/2012 03:37 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012 11:09:47 +0100, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
>> By setting bus_num to 0 the resulting device is named "spi0". Otherwise
>> the name was "spi32766" (dynamic numbering) which was a bit confusing.
>>
>> Using 0 is correct as this driver (and the MPC5200 SPI controller) only
>> supports one SPI bus.
> 
> But the chip has multiple SPI busses. If the psc spi bus gets probed
> first, then there will be a number conflict.

Yes, correct. Lets drop this patch for now then.

Thanks,
Stefan


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
index 0454106..b40370c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mpc52xx.c
@@ -438,6 +438,9 @@  static int __devinit mpc52xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 	master->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA | SPI_LSB_FIRST;
 	master->dev.of_node = op->dev.of_node;
 
+	/* Only one SPI bus from this driver possible */
+	master->bus_num = 0;
+
 	dev_set_drvdata(&op->dev, master);
 
 	ms = spi_master_get_devdata(master);