@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int fsl_espi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
return -EINVAL;
if (!cs) {
- cs = kzalloc(sizeof *cs, GFP_KERNEL);
+ cs = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*cs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cs)
return -ENOMEM;
spi->controller_state = cs;
@@ -99,11 +99,6 @@ int mpc8xxx_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
return 0;
}
-void mpc8xxx_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi)
-{
- kfree(spi->controller_state);
-}
-
const char *mpc8xxx_spi_strmode(unsigned int flags)
{
if (flags & SPI_QE_CPU_MODE) {
@@ -134,7 +129,6 @@ int mpc8xxx_spi_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *mem,
| SPI_LSB_FIRST | SPI_LOOP;
master->transfer = mpc8xxx_spi_transfer;
- master->cleanup = mpc8xxx_spi_cleanup;
master->dev.of_node = dev->of_node;
mpc8xxx_spi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
@@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ extern struct mpc8xxx_spi_probe_info *to_of_pinfo(
extern int mpc8xxx_spi_bufs(struct mpc8xxx_spi *mspi,
struct spi_transfer *t, unsigned int len);
extern int mpc8xxx_spi_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_message *m);
-extern void mpc8xxx_spi_cleanup(struct spi_device *spi);
extern const char *mpc8xxx_spi_strmode(unsigned int flags);
extern int mpc8xxx_spi_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *mem,
unsigned int irq);
In current code, master->cleanup and master->setup are not set in the same function. This makes it hard to read and not good for code maintain. One example is in fsl-spi.c, master->cleanup is overrided in mpc8xxx_spi_probe() which leads to a memory leak. This patch removes mpc8xxx_spi_cleanup() and converts fsl_espi_setup to use devm_kzalloc so we don't need to take care of freeing memory. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com> --- drivers/spi/spi-fsl-espi.c | 2 +- drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.c | 6 ------ drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lib.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)