| Message ID | 1449485255-1103-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:17:28PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> checkpatch complains about multiple blank lines.
Please don't resubmit already applied patches, please submit against the
latest development code for the subsystem you're submitting to (unless
the change is a bug fix that should go to Linus).
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:07:37PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 04:17:28PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > checkpatch complains about multiple blank lines. > > Please don't resubmit already applied patches, please submit against the > latest development code for the subsystem you're submitting to (unless > the change is a bug fix that should go to Linus). I think there is some confusion. I am not seeing v1 of these patches in for-next branch of your spi tree. And in review of v1 you said to use dev_*. And for that last 2 patch of v1 changed and one extra came so I sent the whole series as v2. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:03:00AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > I think there is some confusion. I am not seeing v1 of these patches in > for-next branch of your spi tree. And in review of v1 you said to use > dev_*. And for that last 2 patch of v1 changed and one extra came so I > sent the whole series as v2. I'm not sure why you're not seeing them but they're there...
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:49:56PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:03:00AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > I think there is some confusion. I am not seeing v1 of these patches in > > for-next branch of your spi tree. And in review of v1 you said to use > > dev_*. And for that last 2 patch of v1 changed and one extra came so I > > sent the whole series as v2. > > I'm not sure why you're not seeing them but they're there... oops... no. Sorry for that. I think I checked before updating your tree in my local tree. sorry again. regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c index ba72347..eb4b421 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c @@ -23,11 +23,9 @@ #include <linux/sysfs.h> #include <linux/workqueue.h> - #include <linux/spi/spi.h> #include <linux/spi/spi_bitbang.h> - /* * The LM70 communicates with a host processor using a 3-wire variant of * the SPI/Microwire bus interface. This driver specifically supports an @@ -88,7 +86,6 @@ struct spi_lm70llp { /* REVISIT : ugly global ; provides "exclusive open" facility */ static struct spi_lm70llp *lm70llp; - /*-------------------------------------------------------------------*/ static inline struct spi_lm70llp *spidev_to_pp(struct spi_device *spi) @@ -319,7 +316,6 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_detach(struct parport *p) lm70llp = NULL; } - static struct parport_driver spi_lm70llp_drv = { .name = DRVNAME, .attach = spi_lm70llp_attach,
checkpatch complains about multiple blank lines. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> --- drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)