diff mbox

[1/1] ARM: spi supports 32bytes buffer for DUAL and QUAD

Message ID 1478248734-32044-2-git-send-email-cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 3be09bec42a800d4f8ead8119c462f3eb4fad435
Headers show

Commit Message

Cao Minh Hiep Nov. 4, 2016, 8:38 a.m. UTC
From: Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>

This patch supports 32bytes of buffer for DUAL and QUAD in QSPI by
Using Transmit/Receive Buffer Data Triggering Number.
In order to improve the DUAL and QUAD's performance of SPI 
while transferring data in PIO mode, it sends/receives each 32bytes 
data instead of each byte data as current situation.

Signed-off-by: Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown Nov. 4, 2016, 5:06 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 05:38:54PM +0900, Cao Minh Hiep wrote:
> From: Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
> 
> This patch supports 32bytes of buffer for DUAL and QUAD in QSPI by
> Using Transmit/Receive Buffer Data Triggering Number.

Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
Niklas Söderlund Nov. 5, 2016, 7:32 a.m. UTC | #2
Hi Cao,

On 2016-11-04 17:38:54 +0900, Cao Minh Hiep wrote:
> From: Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
> 
> This patch supports 32bytes of buffer for DUAL and QUAD in QSPI by
> Using Transmit/Receive Buffer Data Triggering Number.
> In order to improve the DUAL and QUAD's performance of SPI 
> while transferring data in PIO mode, it sends/receives each 32bytes 
> data instead of each byte data as current situation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
> index a816f07..fb12bc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static unsigned int qspi_set_send_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi,
>  	return n;
>  }
>  
> -static void qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
> +static int qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
>  {
>  	unsigned int n;
>  
> @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static void qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
>  		qspi_update(rspi, SPBFCR_RXTRG_MASK,
>  			     SPBFCR_RXTRG_1B, QSPI_SPBFCR);
>  	}
> +	return n;
>  }
>  
>  #define set_config_register(spi, n) spi->ops->set_config_register(spi, n)
> @@ -514,6 +515,51 @@ static int rspi_pio_transfer(struct rspi_data *rspi, const u8 *tx, u8 *rx,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our(struct rspi_data *rspi, const u8 *tx,
> +				       u8 *rx, unsigned int n)

Nitpicking, s/rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our/rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_out/ 
or am I missing something?

> +{
> +	unsigned int i, len;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	while (n > 0) {
> +		if (tx) {
> +			len = qspi_set_send_trigger(rspi, n);
> +			if (len == QSPI_BUFFER_SIZE) {
> +				ret = rspi_wait_for_tx_empty(rspi);
> +				if (ret < 0) {
> +					dev_err(&rspi->master->dev, "transmit timeout\n");
> +					return ret;
> +				}
> +				for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +					rspi_write_data(rspi, *tx++);
> +			} else {
> +				ret = rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, tx, NULL, n);
> +				if (ret < 0)
> +					return ret;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		if (rx) {
> +			len = qspi_set_receive_trigger(rspi, n);
> +			if (len == QSPI_BUFFER_SIZE) {
> +				ret = rspi_wait_for_rx_full(rspi);
> +				if (ret < 0) {
> +					dev_err(&rspi->master->dev, "receive timeout\n");
> +					return ret;
> +				}
> +				for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +					*rx++ = rspi_read_data(rspi);
> +			} else {
> +				ret = rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, NULL, rx, n);
> +				if (ret < 0)
> +					return ret;
> +				*rx++ = ret;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		n -= len;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static void rspi_dma_complete(void *arg)
>  {
>  	struct rspi_data *rspi = arg;
> @@ -793,7 +839,7 @@ static int qspi_transfer_out(struct rspi_data *rspi, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, xfer->tx_buf, NULL, xfer->len);
> +	ret = rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our(rspi, xfer->tx_buf, NULL, xfer->len);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -811,7 +857,7 @@ static int qspi_transfer_in(struct rspi_data *rspi, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> -	return rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, NULL, xfer->rx_buf, xfer->len);
> +	return rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our(rspi, NULL, xfer->rx_buf, xfer->len);
>  }
>  
>  static int qspi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,
> -- 
> 1.9.1
>
Cao Minh Hiep Nov. 7, 2016, 12:27 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Niklas,

Thanks for your comment.

On 11/05/2016 04:32 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> Hi Cao,
>
> On 2016-11-04 17:38:54 +0900, Cao Minh Hiep wrote:
>> From: Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
>>
>> This patch supports 32bytes of buffer for DUAL and QUAD in QSPI by
>> Using Transmit/Receive Buffer Data Triggering Number.
>> In order to improve the DUAL and QUAD's performance of SPI
>> while transferring data in PIO mode, it sends/receives each 32bytes
>> data instead of each byte data as current situation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hiep Cao Minh <cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp>
>> ---
>>   drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
>> index a816f07..fb12bc5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
>> @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static unsigned int qspi_set_send_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi,
>>   	return n;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static void qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
>> +static int qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int n;
>>   
>> @@ -428,6 +428,7 @@ static void qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
>>   		qspi_update(rspi, SPBFCR_RXTRG_MASK,
>>   			     SPBFCR_RXTRG_1B, QSPI_SPBFCR);
>>   	}
>> +	return n;
>>   }
>>   
>>   #define set_config_register(spi, n) spi->ops->set_config_register(spi, n)
>> @@ -514,6 +515,51 @@ static int rspi_pio_transfer(struct rspi_data *rspi, const u8 *tx, u8 *rx,
>>   	return 0;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static int rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our(struct rspi_data *rspi, const u8 *tx,
>> +				       u8 *rx, unsigned int n)
> Nitpicking, s/rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our/rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_out/
> or am I missing something?
You're right!. It should be "rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_out"
I'll update it in an other patch.

Thanks.
Jinzai Solution Inc,
Hiep.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
index a816f07..fb12bc5 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rspi.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@  static unsigned int qspi_set_send_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi,
 	return n;
 }
 
-static void qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
+static int qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
 {
 	unsigned int n;
 
@@ -428,6 +428,7 @@  static void qspi_set_receive_trigger(struct rspi_data *rspi, unsigned int len)
 		qspi_update(rspi, SPBFCR_RXTRG_MASK,
 			     SPBFCR_RXTRG_1B, QSPI_SPBFCR);
 	}
+	return n;
 }
 
 #define set_config_register(spi, n) spi->ops->set_config_register(spi, n)
@@ -514,6 +515,51 @@  static int rspi_pio_transfer(struct rspi_data *rspi, const u8 *tx, u8 *rx,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our(struct rspi_data *rspi, const u8 *tx,
+				       u8 *rx, unsigned int n)
+{
+	unsigned int i, len;
+	int ret;
+
+	while (n > 0) {
+		if (tx) {
+			len = qspi_set_send_trigger(rspi, n);
+			if (len == QSPI_BUFFER_SIZE) {
+				ret = rspi_wait_for_tx_empty(rspi);
+				if (ret < 0) {
+					dev_err(&rspi->master->dev, "transmit timeout\n");
+					return ret;
+				}
+				for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+					rspi_write_data(rspi, *tx++);
+			} else {
+				ret = rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, tx, NULL, n);
+				if (ret < 0)
+					return ret;
+			}
+		}
+		if (rx) {
+			len = qspi_set_receive_trigger(rspi, n);
+			if (len == QSPI_BUFFER_SIZE) {
+				ret = rspi_wait_for_rx_full(rspi);
+				if (ret < 0) {
+					dev_err(&rspi->master->dev, "receive timeout\n");
+					return ret;
+				}
+				for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
+					*rx++ = rspi_read_data(rspi);
+			} else {
+				ret = rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, NULL, rx, n);
+				if (ret < 0)
+					return ret;
+				*rx++ = ret;
+			}
+		}
+		n -= len;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static void rspi_dma_complete(void *arg)
 {
 	struct rspi_data *rspi = arg;
@@ -793,7 +839,7 @@  static int qspi_transfer_out(struct rspi_data *rspi, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	ret = rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, xfer->tx_buf, NULL, xfer->len);
+	ret = rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our(rspi, xfer->tx_buf, NULL, xfer->len);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -811,7 +857,7 @@  static int qspi_transfer_in(struct rspi_data *rspi, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
-	return rspi_pio_transfer(rspi, NULL, xfer->rx_buf, xfer->len);
+	return rspi_pio_transfer_in_or_our(rspi, NULL, xfer->rx_buf, xfer->len);
 }
 
 static int qspi_transfer_one(struct spi_master *master, struct spi_device *spi,