[v5.4.y,v5.10.y] spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on SPI buses

Commit Message

Hardik Gohil Nov. 5, 2024, 4:29 a.m. UTC

From: Mark Brown <[e-mail]>

[ Upstream commit 6098475d4cb48d821bdf453c61118c56e26294f0 ]

Currently we have a global spi_add_lock which we take when adding new
devices so that we can check that we're not trying to reuse a chip
select that's already controlled.  This means that if the SPI device is
itself a SPI controller and triggers the instantiation of further SPI
devices we trigger a deadlock as we try to register and instantiate
those devices while in the process of doing so for the parent controller
and hence already holding the global spi_add_lock.  Since we only care
about concurrency within a single SPI bus move the lock to be per
controller, avoiding the deadlock.

This can be easily triggered in the case of spi-mux.

Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Hardik Gohil <[e-mail]>
---
This fix was not backported to v5.4 and v5.10

please also apply following fix on top of this

spi: fix use-after-free of the add_lock mutex
commit 6c53b45c71b4920b5e62f0ea8079a1da382b9434 upstream.

Commit 6098475d4cb4 ("spi: Fix deadlock when adding SPI controllers on
SPI buses") introduced a per-controller mutex. But mutex_unlock() of
said lock is called after the controller is already freed:

 drivers/spi/spi.c       | 15 +++++----------
 include/linux/spi/spi.h |  3 +++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 0f9410e..58f1947 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -472,12 +472,6 @@  static LIST_HEAD(spi_controller_list);
  */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(board_lock);
 
-/*
- * Prevents addition of devices with same chip select and
- * addition of devices below an unregistering controller.
- */
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(spi_add_lock);
-
 /**
  * spi_alloc_device - Allocate a new SPI device
  * @ctlr: Controller to which device is connected
@@ -580,7 +574,7 @@  int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 	 * chipselect **BEFORE** we call setup(), else we'll trash
 	 * its configuration.  Lock against concurrent add() calls.
 	 */
-	mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&ctlr->add_lock);
 
 	status = bus_for_each_dev(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi, spi_dev_check);
 	if (status) {
@@ -624,7 +618,7 @@  int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
 	}
 
 done:
-	mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&ctlr->add_lock);
 	return status;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_add_device);
@@ -2512,6 +2506,7 @@  int spi_register_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 	spin_lock_init(&ctlr->bus_lock_spinlock);
 	mutex_init(&ctlr->bus_lock_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&ctlr->io_mutex);
+	mutex_init(&ctlr->add_lock);
 	ctlr->bus_lock_flag = 0;
 	init_completion(&ctlr->xfer_completion);
 	if (!ctlr->max_dma_len)
@@ -2657,7 +2652,7 @@  void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 
 	/* Prevent addition of new devices, unregister existing ones */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_DYNAMIC))
-		mutex_lock(&spi_add_lock);
+		mutex_lock(&ctlr->add_lock);
 
 	device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister);
 
@@ -2688,7 +2683,7 @@  void spi_unregister_controller(struct spi_controller *ctlr)
 	mutex_unlock(&board_lock);
 
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPI_DYNAMIC))
-		mutex_unlock(&spi_add_lock);
+		mutex_unlock(&ctlr->add_lock);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_unregister_controller);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
index ca39b33..1b9cb90 100644
--- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
+++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
@@ -483,6 +483,9 @@  struct spi_controller {
 	/* I/O mutex */
 	struct mutex		io_mutex;
 
+	/* Used to avoid adding the same CS twice */
+	struct mutex		add_lock;
+
 	/* lock and mutex for SPI bus locking */
 	spinlock_t		bus_lock_spinlock;
 	struct mutex		bus_lock_mutex;