@@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@ static void mmc_spi_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
#endif
/* issue command; then optionally data and stop */
+ spi_lock_bus(host->spi);
status = mmc_spi_command_send(host, mrq, mrq->cmd, mrq->data != NULL);
if (status == 0 && mrq->data) {
mmc_spi_data_do(host, mrq->cmd, mrq->data, mrq->data->blksz);
@@ -1092,7 +1093,7 @@ static void mmc_spi_request(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq)
else
mmc_cs_off(host);
}
-
+ spi_unlock_bus(host->spi);
mmc_request_done(host->mmc, mrq);
}
@@ -1337,32 +1338,6 @@ static int mmc_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
return status;
}
- /* We can use the bus safely iff nobody else will interfere with us.
- * Most commands consist of one SPI message to issue a command, then
- * several more to collect its response, then possibly more for data
- * transfer. Clocking access to other devices during that period will
- * corrupt the command execution.
- *
- * Until we have software primitives which guarantee non-interference,
- * we'll aim for a hardware-level guarantee.
- *
- * REVISIT we can't guarantee another device won't be added later...
- */
- if (spi->master->num_chipselect > 1) {
- struct count_children cc;
-
- cc.n = 0;
- cc.bus = spi->dev.bus;
- status = device_for_each_child(spi->dev.parent, &cc,
- maybe_count_child);
- if (status < 0) {
- dev_err(&spi->dev, "can't share SPI bus\n");
- return status;
- }
-
- dev_warn(&spi->dev, "ASSUMING SPI bus stays unshared!\n");
- }
-
/* We need a supply of ones to transmit. This is the only time
* the CPU touches these, so cache coherency isn't a concern.
*