Applied "spi: spi-mem: Split spi_mem_exec_op() code" to the spi tree

Commit Message

Mark Brown Nov. 20, 2018, 4:30 p.m. UTC

The patch

   spi: spi-mem: Split spi_mem_exec_op() code

has been applied to the spi tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

From f86c24f4795303e4024bc113196de32782f6ccb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Brezillon <[e-mail]>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2018 17:05:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-mem: Split spi_mem_exec_op() code

The logic surrounding the ->exec_op() call applies to direct mapping
accessors. Move this code to separate functions to avoid duplicating
code.

Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[e-mail]>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-mem.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
index 967f581bca4f..7916e655afc8 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-mem.c
@@ -213,6 +213,44 @@  bool spi_mem_supports_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(spi_mem_supports_op);
 
+static int spi_mem_access_start(struct spi_mem *mem)
+{
+	struct spi_controller *ctlr = mem->spi->controller;
+
+	/*
+	 * Flush the message queue before executing our SPI memory
+	 * operation to prevent preemption of regular SPI transfers.
+	 */
+	spi_flush_queue(ctlr);
+
+	if (ctlr->auto_runtime_pm) {
+		int ret;
+
+		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctlr->dev.parent);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
+				ret);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
+
+	mutex_lock(&ctlr->bus_lock_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void spi_mem_access_end(struct spi_mem *mem)
+{
+	struct spi_controller *ctlr = mem->spi->controller;
+
+	mutex_unlock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
+	mutex_unlock(&ctlr->bus_lock_mutex);
+
+	if (ctlr->auto_runtime_pm)
+		pm_runtime_put(ctlr->dev.parent);
+}
+
 /**
  * spi_mem_exec_op() - Execute a memory operation
  * @mem: the SPI memory
@@ -242,30 +280,13 @@  int spi_mem_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 
 	if (ctlr->mem_ops) {
-		/*
-		 * Flush the message queue before executing our SPI memory
-		 * operation to prevent preemption of regular SPI transfers.
-		 */
-		spi_flush_queue(ctlr);
-
-		if (ctlr->auto_runtime_pm) {
-			ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctlr->dev.parent);
-			if (ret < 0) {
-				dev_err(&ctlr->dev,
-					"Failed to power device: %d\n",
-					ret);
-				return ret;
-			}
-		}
+		ret = spi_mem_access_start(mem);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 
-		mutex_lock(&ctlr->bus_lock_mutex);
-		mutex_lock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
 		ret = ctlr->mem_ops->exec_op(mem, op);
-		mutex_unlock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
-		mutex_unlock(&ctlr->bus_lock_mutex);
 
-		if (ctlr->auto_runtime_pm)
-			pm_runtime_put(ctlr->dev.parent);
+		spi_mem_access_end(mem);
 
 		/*
 		 * Some controllers only optimize specific paths (typically the