Message ID | 20220802175755.6530-10-sudip.mukherjee@sifive.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Add support for enhanced SPI for Designware SPI controllers | expand |
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 06:57:53PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > The transfer routine of dual/quad/octal is similar to standard SPI mode > except that we do not need to worry about CS being de-asserted and we > will be writing the address to a single FIFO location. Please redesign this patch to having the IRQ-based transfers. For instance you can just create a new dw_spi_enh_write_then_read() method which would initialize the IRQs, set up a custom dw_spi_enh_transfer_handler() method as transfer_handler (or perhaps re-use the already available dw_spi_transfer_handler() method?) and initiate the transfer by writing the command and address data to the Tx FIFO. Feel free to create some preparation patches if it's needed to reach the goal. -Sergey > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@sifive.com> > --- > drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > index 2564a2276572..d6afa75e7023 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c > @@ -712,6 +712,28 @@ static int dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(struct dw_spi *dws) > return 0; > } > > +static void ext_transfer_delay(struct dw_spi *dws) > +{ > + struct spi_delay delay; > + unsigned long ns, us; > + u32 nents; > + > + nents = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLR); > + ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / dws->current_freq * nents; > + ns *= dws->n_bytes * BITS_PER_BYTE; > + if (ns <= NSEC_PER_USEC) { > + delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_NSECS; > + delay.value = ns; > + } else { > + us = DIV_ROUND_UP(ns, NSEC_PER_USEC); > + delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS; > + delay.value = clamp_val(us, 0, USHRT_MAX); > + } > + /* wait until there is some space in TX FIFO */ > + while (!(dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_SR) & DW_SPI_SR_TF_NOT_FULL)) > + spi_delay_exec(&delay, NULL); > +} > + > static void dw_spi_stop_mem_op(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi) > { > dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0); > @@ -719,6 +741,82 @@ static void dw_spi_stop_mem_op(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi) > dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 1); > } > > +static int enhanced_transfer(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi, > + const struct spi_mem_op *op) > +{ > + u32 max, txw = 0, rxw; > + bool cs_done = false; > + void *buf = dws->tx; > + int ret; > + > + /* Send cmd as 32 bit value */ > + if (buf) { > + txw = *(u32 *)(buf); > + dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw); > + buf += 4; > + dws->tx_len--; > + if (op->addr.nbytes) { > + /* > + * Send address as 32 bit value if address > + * is present in the instruction. > + */ > + txw = *(u32 *)(buf); > + dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw); > + buf += 4; > + dws->tx_len--; > + } > + } > + > + do { > + max = min_t(u32, dws->tx_len, dws->fifo_len - > + dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLR)); > + while (max--) { > + if (buf) { > + txw = *(u8 *)(buf); > + buf += dws->n_bytes; > + } > + dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw); > + --dws->tx_len; > + } > + /* Enable CS after filling up FIFO */ > + if (!cs_done) { > + dw_spi_set_cs(spi, false); > + cs_done = true; > + } > + ext_transfer_delay(dws); > + if (!dws->tx_len && !dws->rx_len) { > + /* > + * We only need to wait for done if there is > + * nothing to receive and there is nothing more > + * to transmit. If we are receiving, then the > + * wait cycles will make sure we wait. > + */ > + ret = dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(dws); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + } while (dws->tx_len); > + > + buf = dws->rx; > + while (dws->rx_len) { > + max = dw_spi_rx_max(dws); > + > + while (max--) { > + rxw = dw_read_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR); > + if (buf) { > + *(u8 *)(buf) = rxw; > + buf += dws->n_bytes; > + } > + --dws->rx_len; > + } > + > + ret = dw_spi_check_status(dws, true); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > static void update_spi_ctrl0(struct dw_spi *dws, const struct spi_mem_op *op, bool enable) > { > u32 spi_ctrlr0; > @@ -846,25 +944,36 @@ static int dw_spi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op) > * manually restricting the SPI bus frequency using the > * dws->max_mem_freq parameter. > */ > - local_irq_save(flags); > - preempt_disable(); > + if (!enhanced_spi) { > + local_irq_save(flags); > + preempt_disable(); > > - ret = dw_spi_write_then_read(dws, mem->spi); > + ret = dw_spi_write_then_read(dws, mem->spi); > > - local_irq_restore(flags); > - preempt_enable(); > + local_irq_restore(flags); > + preempt_enable(); > > - /* > - * Wait for the operation being finished and check the controller > - * status only if there hasn't been any run-time error detected. In the > - * former case it's just pointless. In the later one to prevent an > - * additional error message printing since any hw error flag being set > - * would be due to an error detected on the data transfer. > - */ > - if (!ret) { > - ret = dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(dws); > - if (!ret) > - ret = dw_spi_check_status(dws, true); > + /* > + * Wait for the operation being finished and check the > + * controller status only if there hasn't been any > + * run-time error detected. In the former case it's > + * just pointless. In the later one to prevent an > + * additional error message printing since any hw error > + * flag being set would be due to an error detected on > + * the data transfer. > + */ > + if (!ret) { > + ret = dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(dws); > + if (!ret) > + ret = dw_spi_check_status(dws, true); > + } > + } else { > + /* > + * We donot need to disable IRQs as clock stretching will > + * be enabled in enhanced mode which will prevent CS > + * from being de-assert. > + */ > + ret = enhanced_transfer(dws, mem->spi, op); > } > > dw_spi_stop_mem_op(dws, mem->spi); > -- > 2.30.2 >
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c index 2564a2276572..d6afa75e7023 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c @@ -712,6 +712,28 @@ static int dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(struct dw_spi *dws) return 0; } +static void ext_transfer_delay(struct dw_spi *dws) +{ + struct spi_delay delay; + unsigned long ns, us; + u32 nents; + + nents = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLR); + ns = NSEC_PER_SEC / dws->current_freq * nents; + ns *= dws->n_bytes * BITS_PER_BYTE; + if (ns <= NSEC_PER_USEC) { + delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_NSECS; + delay.value = ns; + } else { + us = DIV_ROUND_UP(ns, NSEC_PER_USEC); + delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_USECS; + delay.value = clamp_val(us, 0, USHRT_MAX); + } + /* wait until there is some space in TX FIFO */ + while (!(dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_SR) & DW_SPI_SR_TF_NOT_FULL)) + spi_delay_exec(&delay, NULL); +} + static void dw_spi_stop_mem_op(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi) { dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0); @@ -719,6 +741,82 @@ static void dw_spi_stop_mem_op(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi) dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 1); } +static int enhanced_transfer(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi, + const struct spi_mem_op *op) +{ + u32 max, txw = 0, rxw; + bool cs_done = false; + void *buf = dws->tx; + int ret; + + /* Send cmd as 32 bit value */ + if (buf) { + txw = *(u32 *)(buf); + dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw); + buf += 4; + dws->tx_len--; + if (op->addr.nbytes) { + /* + * Send address as 32 bit value if address + * is present in the instruction. + */ + txw = *(u32 *)(buf); + dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw); + buf += 4; + dws->tx_len--; + } + } + + do { + max = min_t(u32, dws->tx_len, dws->fifo_len - + dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_TXFLR)); + while (max--) { + if (buf) { + txw = *(u8 *)(buf); + buf += dws->n_bytes; + } + dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw); + --dws->tx_len; + } + /* Enable CS after filling up FIFO */ + if (!cs_done) { + dw_spi_set_cs(spi, false); + cs_done = true; + } + ext_transfer_delay(dws); + if (!dws->tx_len && !dws->rx_len) { + /* + * We only need to wait for done if there is + * nothing to receive and there is nothing more + * to transmit. If we are receiving, then the + * wait cycles will make sure we wait. + */ + ret = dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(dws); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + } while (dws->tx_len); + + buf = dws->rx; + while (dws->rx_len) { + max = dw_spi_rx_max(dws); + + while (max--) { + rxw = dw_read_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR); + if (buf) { + *(u8 *)(buf) = rxw; + buf += dws->n_bytes; + } + --dws->rx_len; + } + + ret = dw_spi_check_status(dws, true); + if (ret) + return ret; + } + return 0; +} + static void update_spi_ctrl0(struct dw_spi *dws, const struct spi_mem_op *op, bool enable) { u32 spi_ctrlr0; @@ -846,25 +944,36 @@ static int dw_spi_exec_mem_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op) * manually restricting the SPI bus frequency using the * dws->max_mem_freq parameter. */ - local_irq_save(flags); - preempt_disable(); + if (!enhanced_spi) { + local_irq_save(flags); + preempt_disable(); - ret = dw_spi_write_then_read(dws, mem->spi); + ret = dw_spi_write_then_read(dws, mem->spi); - local_irq_restore(flags); - preempt_enable(); + local_irq_restore(flags); + preempt_enable(); - /* - * Wait for the operation being finished and check the controller - * status only if there hasn't been any run-time error detected. In the - * former case it's just pointless. In the later one to prevent an - * additional error message printing since any hw error flag being set - * would be due to an error detected on the data transfer. - */ - if (!ret) { - ret = dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(dws); - if (!ret) - ret = dw_spi_check_status(dws, true); + /* + * Wait for the operation being finished and check the + * controller status only if there hasn't been any + * run-time error detected. In the former case it's + * just pointless. In the later one to prevent an + * additional error message printing since any hw error + * flag being set would be due to an error detected on + * the data transfer. + */ + if (!ret) { + ret = dw_spi_wait_mem_op_done(dws); + if (!ret) + ret = dw_spi_check_status(dws, true); + } + } else { + /* + * We donot need to disable IRQs as clock stretching will + * be enabled in enhanced mode which will prevent CS + * from being de-assert. + */ + ret = enhanced_transfer(dws, mem->spi, op); } dw_spi_stop_mem_op(dws, mem->spi);
The transfer routine of dual/quad/octal is similar to standard SPI mode except that we do not need to worry about CS being de-asserted and we will be writing the address to a single FIFO location. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@sifive.com> --- drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)