| Message ID | 20230704090453.83980-3-william.qiu@starfivetech.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add initialization of clock for StarFive JH7110 SoC | expand |
Hey William, On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:04:52PM +0800, William Qiu wrote: > Add QSPI clock operation in device probe. > > Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com> > Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306022017.UbwjjWRN-lkp@intel.com/ These Reported-by tags don't seem correct, given they were reports about this patch, not the reason for it - but did you actually check that you fixed the errors that the patch produces? This particular one seems to complain about a hunk that is still in the patch & the CI running on the RISC-V patchwork is complaining about it. Cheers, Conor. > @@ -1840,6 +1858,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev) > struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk); > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) > + clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); > cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi); > cqspi_controller_init(cqspi); > > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:36:03PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:04:52PM +0800, William Qiu wrote: > > Add QSPI clock operation in device probe. > > > > Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com> > > Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306022017.UbwjjWRN-lkp@intel.com/ > These Reported-by tags don't seem correct, given they were reports about > this patch, not the reason for it - but did you actually check that you > fixed the errors that the patch produces? Yeah, the Reported-bys that LKP sends in response to on list patches are a menace, they just generate noise. > This particular one seems to complain about a hunk that is still in the > patch & the CI running on the RISC-V patchwork is complaining about it. I'm surprised that builds cleanly anywhere...
On 04/07/2023 11:04, William Qiu wrote: > Add QSPI clock operation in device probe. > > Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com> > Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306022017.UbwjjWRN-lkp@intel.com/ > Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306040644.6ZHs55x4-lkp@intel.com/ > > @@ -1840,6 +1858,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev) > struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk); > + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) Don't add compatible checks inside the code. It does not scale. We expect compatibles to be listed only in one place - of_device_id - and customize driver with match data / quirks / flags. Comment applies to all your diff hunks. > + clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); > cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi); > cqspi_controller_init(cqspi); > Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2023/7/5 0:36, Conor Dooley wrote: > Hey William, > > On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 05:04:52PM +0800, William Qiu wrote: >> Add QSPI clock operation in device probe. >> >> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com> >> Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306022017.UbwjjWRN-lkp@intel.com/ > > These Reported-by tags don't seem correct, given they were reports about > this patch, not the reason for it - but did you actually check that you > fixed the errors that the patch produces? > > This particular one seems to complain about a hunk that is still in the > patch & the CI running on the RISC-V patchwork is complaining about it. > > Cheers, > Conor. > I checked and found that I had only partially fixed it. I'll fix it in next version. Thanks for your comments. Best regards, William >> @@ -1840,6 +1858,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev) >> struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> >> clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk); >> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) >> + clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); >> cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi); >> cqspi_controller_init(cqspi); >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>
On 2023/7/5 14:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 04/07/2023 11:04, William Qiu wrote: >> Add QSPI clock operation in device probe. >> >> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com> >> Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306022017.UbwjjWRN-lkp@intel.com/ >> Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306040644.6ZHs55x4-lkp@intel.com/ > > >> >> @@ -1840,6 +1858,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev) >> struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >> >> clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk); >> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) > > Don't add compatible checks inside the code. It does not scale. We > expect compatibles to be listed only in one place - of_device_id - and > customize driver with match data / quirks / flags. > > Comment applies to all your diff hunks. > I'll use "of_device_get_match_data" to replace it. But the way I added reset before is also by compatible checks. Should I change this place to "of_device_get_match_data" as well? >> + clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); >> cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi); >> cqspi_controller_init(cqspi); >> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
On 05/07/2023 09:04, William Qiu wrote: > > > On 2023/7/5 14:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 04/07/2023 11:04, William Qiu wrote: >>> Add QSPI clock operation in device probe. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> >>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306022017.UbwjjWRN-lkp@intel.com/ >>> Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> >>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306040644.6ZHs55x4-lkp@intel.com/ >> >> >>> >>> @@ -1840,6 +1858,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev) >>> struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>> >>> clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk); >>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) >> >> Don't add compatible checks inside the code. It does not scale. We >> expect compatibles to be listed only in one place - of_device_id - and >> customize driver with match data / quirks / flags. >> >> Comment applies to all your diff hunks. >> > I'll use "of_device_get_match_data" to replace it. But the way I added > reset before is also by compatible checks. Should I change this place to > "of_device_get_match_data" as well? I don't know what's there, but in general driver should be written in a consistent style. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 2023/7/5 15:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 05/07/2023 09:04, William Qiu wrote: >> >> >> On 2023/7/5 14:21, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 04/07/2023 11:04, William Qiu wrote: >>>> Add QSPI clock operation in device probe. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com> >>>> Reviewed-by: Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com> >>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> >>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306022017.UbwjjWRN-lkp@intel.com/ >>>> Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> >>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202306040644.6ZHs55x4-lkp@intel.com/ >>> >>> >>>> >>>> @@ -1840,6 +1858,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev) >>>> struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>>> >>>> clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk); >>>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) >>> >>> Don't add compatible checks inside the code. It does not scale. We >>> expect compatibles to be listed only in one place - of_device_id - and >>> customize driver with match data / quirks / flags. >>> >>> Comment applies to all your diff hunks. >>> >> I'll use "of_device_get_match_data" to replace it. But the way I added >> reset before is also by compatible checks. Should I change this place to >> "of_device_get_match_data" as well? > > I don't know what's there, but in general driver should be written in a > consistent style. >It's in line 1719, inside the "cqspi_probe", but this part of the code is already merged in the main line. Should I keep it in a consistent style? Best regards, William > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c index 6ddb2dfc0f00..8774f9aaff61 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-quadspi.c @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct cqspi_st { struct platform_device *pdev; struct spi_master *master; struct clk *clk; + struct clk_bulk_data *clks; + int num_clks; unsigned int sclk; void __iomem *iobase; @@ -1715,6 +1717,16 @@ static int cqspi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) { + cqspi->num_clks = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &cqspi->clks); + if (cqspi->num_clks < 0) { + dev_err(dev, "Cannot claim clock: %u\n", cqspi->num_clks); + return -EINVAL; + } + + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); + if (ret) + dev_err(dev, "Cannot enable clock clks\n"); + rstc_ref = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(dev, "rstc_ref"); if (IS_ERR(rstc_ref)) { ret = PTR_ERR(rstc_ref); @@ -1816,6 +1828,9 @@ static void cqspi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) clk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->clk); + if (of_device_is_compatible(pdev->dev.of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); + pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev); pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev); } @@ -1831,6 +1846,9 @@ static int cqspi_suspend(struct device *dev) clk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->clk); + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); + return ret; } @@ -1840,6 +1858,8 @@ static int cqspi_resume(struct device *dev) struct spi_master *master = dev_get_drvdata(dev); clk_prepare_enable(cqspi->clk); + if (of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, "starfive,jh7110-qspi")) + clk_bulk_prepare_enable(cqspi->num_clks, cqspi->clks); cqspi_wait_idle(cqspi); cqspi_controller_init(cqspi);