| Message ID | 84eb08daf85d203b34af9d8d08abf86804211413.1694961365.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 8a771075e50bef5e2a063a9f954b36a33fb7359f |
| Headers | show |
| Series | spi: at91-usart: Remove some dead code | expand |
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:36:26 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > dma_request_chan() does not return NULL. It returns a valid pointer or an > error pointer. > > So, some dead code can be removed. > > The IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in the error handling path are still needed, because > the error handling path is common to the whole function and the > ctlr->dma_xx are NULL when at91_usart_spi_configure_dma() is called. > > [...] Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] spi: at91-usart: Remove some dead code commit: 8a771075e50bef5e2a063a9f954b36a33fb7359f All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c b/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c index b11d0f993cc7..1cea8e159344 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c @@ -132,28 +132,14 @@ static int at91_usart_spi_configure_dma(struct spi_controller *ctlr, dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask); ctlr->dma_tx = dma_request_chan(dev, "tx"); - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ctlr->dma_tx)) { - if (IS_ERR(ctlr->dma_tx)) { - err = PTR_ERR(ctlr->dma_tx); - goto at91_usart_spi_error_clear; - } - - dev_dbg(dev, - "DMA TX channel not available, SPI unable to use DMA\n"); - err = -EBUSY; + if (IS_ERR(ctlr->dma_tx)) { + err = PTR_ERR(ctlr->dma_tx); goto at91_usart_spi_error_clear; } ctlr->dma_rx = dma_request_chan(dev, "rx"); - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ctlr->dma_rx)) { - if (IS_ERR(ctlr->dma_rx)) { - err = PTR_ERR(ctlr->dma_rx); - goto at91_usart_spi_error; - } - - dev_dbg(dev, - "DMA RX channel not available, SPI unable to use DMA\n"); - err = -EBUSY; + if (IS_ERR(ctlr->dma_rx)) { + err = PTR_ERR(ctlr->dma_rx); goto at91_usart_spi_error; }
dma_request_chan() does not return NULL. It returns a valid pointer or an error pointer. So, some dead code can be removed. The IS_ERR_OR_NULL() in the error handling path are still needed, because the error handling path is common to the whole function and the ctlr->dma_xx are NULL when at91_usart_spi_configure_dma() is called. Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> --- drivers/spi/spi-at91-usart.c | 22 ++++------------------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)