[b4,0/1] How about adding SourceHut lists as 2nd backend?

Message

Oliver Smith Nov. 12, 2022, 1:11 p.m. UTC

Hi,

I found that with relatively few changes it's possible to add SourceHut
as alternative backend to b4. Is this desirable to have in b4?

Best,
Oliver

Oliver Smith (1):
  RFC: Support SourceHut as additional backend

 b4/__init__.py | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Konstantin Ryabitsev Nov. 14, 2022, 2:49 p.m. UTC | #1

On Sat, Nov 12, 2022 at 02:11:13PM +0100, Oliver Smith wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I found that with relatively few changes it's possible to add SourceHut
> as alternative backend to b4. Is this desirable to have in b4?

Absolutely, I am all for making b4 work with sourcehut. I haven't yet had a
chance to review your patch, but I hope to be able to work on it today or
tomorrow. Some features will require rethinking for sure (e.g. we assume we're
always talking to a public-inbox instance, so when it's not the case we'll
have to adjust features like querying the remote for updates based on
change-id).

Cheers,
-K