From patchwork Sat Nov 12 13:11:13 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Oliver Smith X-Patchwork-Id: 13041203 Received: from proxmox1.postmarketos.org (proxmox1.postmarketos.org [213.239.216.189]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CCCA4A for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 13:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (dynamic-077-004-019-021.77.4.pool.telefonica.de [77.4.19.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox1.postmarketos.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C454D1402F3; Sat, 12 Nov 2022 13:11:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=postmarketos.org; s=donut; t=1668258704; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yl18bpGwyVGtbGmlH4BbY3LEPFwgbf1ZPxb4SGIWFZQ=; b=gH8YB6JtqUy3NI05yDgkKud9kIxW/dTeJGoJDYYswiksYZ8sVrDXw6uErHu0OW93OQMp/m f6OxiSmC+5PEgLMjPT5YRHLycbuiMlz3LrH1IKP/Nf7LA0gPxV5EkbCuKEjpOSp7ohorW3 qVKNUOdWJuVbtFFqAc7ScJQ+YZir9uA= From: Oliver Smith To: tools@linux.kernel.org Cc: Oliver Smith Subject: [PATCH b4 0/1] How about adding SourceHut lists as 2nd backend? Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 14:11:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20221112131114.2370-1-ollieparanoid@postmarketos.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: tools@linux.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi, I found that with relatively few changes it's possible to add SourceHut as alternative backend to b4. Is this desirable to have in b4? Best, Oliver Oliver Smith (1): RFC: Support SourceHut as additional backend b4/__init__.py | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)