Message ID | 20210601161118.18986-1-olaf@aepfle.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=atsh=K3=lists.xenproject.org=xen-devel-bounces@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF05C47092 for <xen-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7698E60FD8 for <xen-devel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:11:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7698E60FD8 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=aepfle.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.134978.250975 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org>) id 1lo6zJ-0005Et-JV; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:11:29 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 134978.250975; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:11:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org>) id 1lo6zJ-0005Em-GD; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:11:29 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 134978; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:11:28 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <SRS0=HQ7/=K3=aepfle.de=olaf@srs-us1.protection.inumbo.net>) id 1lo6zI-0005Ec-1S for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:11:28 +0000 Received: from mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de (unknown [85.215.255.21]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 032e56eb-b77e-45fe-b95a-fb2950e57e76; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sender by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.27.2 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id j0415bx51GBO1B5 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 18:11:24 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/options/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org> List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org> X-Inumbo-ID: 032e56eb-b77e-45fe-b95a-fb2950e57e76 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622563885; cv=none; d=strato.com; s=strato-dkim-0002; b=o8goBTfDenihvrljGvM2v005zlEHG9m3nfjPFkZi+A8YYUoOXANIc/PMTs2jKJtIXc lILFicKM6EtuEJN30gTYYvTISdXa+nfEoqRn4ziuUEhFbkDAMX5qiTCfrf78WSaMadyo UIITWgrFrEkP+0gz0ewjWxnQT8tiZgd007T8RwW86VPpUPON8TvVc/gGV2s0c476A6TV agR0h9HREPQHHMnx3iNnxkgZuEtH5oXGae6ws1KtP4jgwISbIlFATM+5WZswQAZp5TXz XlM3uQrxI/Fvg44UAFyjH4PM9otFaCeyhTTQZRHSS/f7K8yTUNys0xWe8zGq+mCgtGfZ xZ9A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1622563885; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=strato.com; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date:From:Subject:Sender; bh=bw53oX3KFyhVByZkDFnW7+r8yCMylKYkPgRao8lX0jQ=; b=nTyRSGG038jERdFo72r9AEpau6SvPmKojB17028m0nlQ+9NAyVZc5InMFvUJdGqrVH AAtg0kjxm4erZWPvaWodgDMyReMmuW6qktjr0hpBLrPYZarwtXd2w7JsFjAVLTf9MPmg jLS9JoMZJTb88LJPBlsskVWLkmotIryv5cNEYA5Q3p8///cGNe0093qjJHGfVZ5rTpx0 4tT7qnXbjubedi0B4jfB4IYc0GlyR+/CJHtfd+8cbQ6+u/gSzWyH86ainV+8F8OvTDD3 1tdONo4S750Lf7hA2Yh34j4ct4bZM0Sofzepsklx0AHBXppMIoX36/Jh4eRZkvrB5pJW XUzA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; strato.com; dkim=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1622563885; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=aepfle.de; h=Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date:From:Subject:Sender; bh=bw53oX3KFyhVByZkDFnW7+r8yCMylKYkPgRao8lX0jQ=; b=QoPbrLy6f99MRAPXmhdUHvgE6u28C46qd/vJ7g7LIN5QXuvMlVh35HbD90EKiemLye DHvXQ0msSeCiM6hCz9ZLjCd6gklpI9i696MtU0u0m6bBhWyUF81y3ekubgYX2uTpP/Mg hkdIrsegqZl733o0flIemXNYKBs5BGoDRigoGtejw/Cgl/+RCXGGOqYps0fshEo7GtIQ bqAIbspLY/cbCBjAizcyHGf6XZckpWcqTZGz2Z1rOpHf/Pw/xcFBQr0psiMNFJ+Pggu8 No64kSjvhOPmewQh7RyiSayDHcOPl7hjaS+XSq/GwNzuThFOo0x74ajTvSLU8Gm7XADt EY/Q== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":P2EQZWCpfu+qG7CngxMFH1J+3q8wa/QXkBR9MXjAuzpIG0mv9coXAgs09ValFcstyKtnZMLOo4jr88Zf5nXI1mYJUK+h" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> Subject: [PATCH v20210601 00/38] leftover from 2020 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 18:10:40 +0200 Message-Id: <20210601161118.18986-1-olaf@aepfle.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit |
Series |
leftover from 2020
|
expand
|
On 01.06.21 18:10, Olaf Hering wrote:
> Various unreviewed changes, rebase to 57f68dfd2d.
Would it be possible to split this into multiple independent
patches/series?
Juergen
Am Wed, 2 Jun 2021 08:10:21 +0200 schrieb Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>: > Would it be possible to split this into multiple independent > patches/series? Sure, I can send each individual part that was already sent over and over again. Olaf
On 02.06.21 08:54, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am Wed, 2 Jun 2021 08:10:21 +0200 > schrieb Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>: > >> Would it be possible to split this into multiple independent >> patches/series? > > Sure, I can send each individual part that was already sent over and over again. IMO this will make it more probable to get at least parts committed. Juergen
Am Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:00:49 +0200
schrieb Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>:
> IMO this will make it more probable to get at least parts committed.
It depends all on patch #3, so further split can not be done anymore at this point.
Olaf
On 02.06.21 14:07, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am Wed, 2 Jun 2021 09:00:49 +0200 > schrieb Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>: > >> IMO this will make it more probable to get at least parts committed. > > It depends all on patch #3, so further split can not be done anymore at this point. I don't see the dependency e.g. in patch 27, 28 and 38. Juergen