Message ID | 3ce4ab2c-8cb6-1482-6ce9-3d5b019e10c1@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | (remaining) XSA-292 follow-up | expand |
Andrew, On 25.09.2019 17:19, Jan Beulich wrote: > 1: x86: suppress XPTI-related TLB flushes when possible > 2: x86/mm: honor opt_pcid also for 32-bit PV domains I realize these two weren't entirely uncontroversial. May I please ask that you get back to them, more than half a year after their posting? For patch 1 I don't think I got anything back yet on v2 / v3. For patch 2 see https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-09/msg01721.html > 3: x86/HVM: move NOFLUSH handling out of hvm_set_cr3() See https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-09/msg01689.html https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-09/msg01737.html > 4: x86/HVM: refuse CR3 loads with reserved (upper) bits set > 5: x86/HVM: cosmetics to hvm_set_cr3() These two have your ack, but depend on at least patch 3 afaict. Jan