Message ID | cover.1727452451.git.oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Move {acpi_}device_init() and device_get_class() to common code | expand |
Hello everyone, Except the comments ( which Jan wrote could be adjusted while committing ) for patch 1 everything is properly Acked/Reviewed ( if I am not missing something ). I also checked if the patch series rebase/apply on top of current staging and I hadn't any issue. Could someone please tell me what should be my next steps? Should I resend this patch series in case I miss something? Thanks. ~ Oleksii On Fri, 2024-09-27 at 18:32 +0200, Oleksii Kurochko wrote: > The {acpi_}device_init() and device_get_class() functions are > identical across > Arm and RISC-V, and they are likely to remain the same for other > architectures > like PPC. > Since there is no architecture-specific logic within these functions, > they are > good candidates to be moved to the common codebase. > > This patch series refactors the code by moving these functions to the > common > directory, reducing code duplication and simplifying future > maintenance. > > --- > Changes in V5: > - Rename SIMPLE_DECL_SECTION to DECL_SECTION_WITH_LADDR and update > the other > patches correspondingly. > - Drop macros argument for ACPI_DEV_INFO and DT_DEV_INFO. > --- > Changes in V4: > - Introduce SIMPLE_DECL_SECTION to cover the cases when an > architecture wants > to use section declaration without specifying an load address. > - Refactor macors ACPI_DEV_INFO and DT_DEV_INFO and update their > defintion. > --- > Changes in V3: > - drop _SECTIONS from the name of the macros ADEV_INFO and > DT_DEV_INFO > - update the definion of macros ADEV_INFO and DT_DEV_INFO > - drop DEVICE_INIT config. > --- > Changes in v2: > - Introduce macros for definition of ACPI and Device Tree sections. > - Introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_INIT to make common/device.o compilable > only for Arm, > PPC and RISC-V. > --- > > Oleksii Kurochko (6): > xen: introduce DECL_SECTION_WITH_LADDR > xen: define ACPI and DT device info sections macros > xen/arm: use {DT,ACPI}_DEV_INFO for device info sections > xen/ppc: add section for device information in linker script > xen/riscv: add section for device information in linker script > xen/common: move device initialization code to common code > > xen/arch/arm/device.c | 71 +-------------------------------- > xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 14 +------ > xen/arch/ppc/xen.lds.S | 4 ++ > xen/arch/riscv/xen.lds.S | 2 + > xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S | 6 ++- > xen/common/Makefile | 2 + > xen/common/device.c | 82 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > xen/include/xen/xen.lds.h | 22 +++++++++++ > 8 files changed, 120 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 xen/common/device.c >
On 08.10.2024 17:25, oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com wrote: > Except the comments ( which Jan wrote could be adjusted while > committing ) for patch 1 everything is properly Acked/Reviewed ( if I > am not missing something ). I didn't spot a PPC ack so far; did I miss it? Jan
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 17:30 +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 08.10.2024 17:25, oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com wrote: > > Except the comments ( which Jan wrote could be adjusted while > > committing ) for patch 1 everything is properly Acked/Reviewed ( if > > I > > am not missing something ). > > I didn't spot a PPC ack so far; did I miss it? Yeah, you are right I confused ( I thought that he gave his Ack before and I just forgot to add it ) with another one patch where Shawn gave his Ack. I will ask Shawn to look at patch 1. ~ Oleksii