diff mbox series

[1/5] x86/mwait-idle: mention assumption that WBINVD is not needed

Message ID 0ebb0de3-2500-a9a2-8128-64b9d4a27cb7@suse.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series x86/mwait-idle: updates from Linux | expand

Commit Message

Jan Beulich Sept. 6, 2021, 12:59 p.m. UTC
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>

Intel SDM does not explicitly say that entering a C-state via MWAIT will
implicitly flush CPU caches as appropriate for that C-state. However,
documentation for individual Intel CPU generations does mention this
behavior.

Since intel_idle binds to any Intel CPU with MWAIT, list this assumption
of MWAIT behavior.

In passing, reword opening comment to make it clear that the driver can
load on any old and future Intel CPU with MWAIT.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[Linux commit: 8bb2e2a887afdf8a39e68fa0dccf82a168aae655]

Dropped "reword opending comment" part - this doesn't apply to our code:
First thing mwait_idle_probe() does is call x86_match_cpu(); we do not
have a 2nd such call looking for just MWAIT (in order to the use _CST
data directly, which we can't get our hands at _CST at this point yet).

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Comments

Roger Pau Monné Jan. 18, 2022, 10:18 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
> 
> Intel SDM does not explicitly say that entering a C-state via MWAIT will
> implicitly flush CPU caches as appropriate for that C-state. However,
> documentation for individual Intel CPU generations does mention this
> behavior.
> 
> Since intel_idle binds to any Intel CPU with MWAIT, list this assumption
> of MWAIT behavior.
> 
> In passing, reword opening comment to make it clear that the driver can
> load on any old and future Intel CPU with MWAIT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> [Linux commit: 8bb2e2a887afdf8a39e68fa0dccf82a168aae655]
> 
> Dropped "reword opending comment" part - this doesn't apply to our code:
> First thing mwait_idle_probe() does is call x86_match_cpu(); we do not
> have a 2nd such call looking for just MWAIT (in order to the use _CST
> data directly, which we can't get our hands at _CST at this point yet).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>

Thanks, Roger.
diff mbox series

Patch

--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/mwait-idle.c
@@ -31,6 +31,10 @@ 
  *
  * Chipset BM_STS (bus master status) bit is a NOP
  *	for preventing entry into deep C-states
+ *
+ * CPU will flush caches as needed when entering a C-state via MWAIT
+ *	(in contrast to entering ACPI C3, in which case the WBINVD
+ *	instruction needs to be executed to flush the caches)
  */
 
 /*