Message ID | 1452426622-4471-42-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org> X-Original-To: patchwork-xen-devel@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork2.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork2.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0F2BEEE5 for <patchwork-xen-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E31201FA for <patchwork-xen-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:24:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xen.org (lists.xenproject.org [50.57.142.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB922015A for <patchwork-xen-devel@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xen.org) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>) id 1aIGt1-0003DA-MI; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:22:27 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1aIGt0-0003BF-3c for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:22:26 +0000 Received: from [85.158.137.68] by server-5.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id BE/D4-07651-12962965; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:22:25 +0000 X-Env-Sender: mst@redhat.com X-Msg-Ref: server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com!1452435743!15043864!1 X-Originating-IP: [209.132.183.28] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMjA5LjEzMi4xODMuMjggPT4gNTQwNjQ=\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 7.35.1; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 45393 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2016 14:22:24 -0000 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by server-8.tower-31.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2016 14:22:24 -0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F21A3F3A4; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (vpn1-5-155.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.5.155]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id u0AEMEv2032169; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 09:22:15 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:22:14 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1452426622-4471-42-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1452426622-4471-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452426622-4471-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> X-Mutt-Fcc: =sent X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24 Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, x86@kernel.org, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, adi-buildroot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 41/41] s390: more efficient smp barriers X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org> List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP |
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h index 4d26fa4..5c8db3c 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ do { \ ___p1; \ }) +#define __smp_mb__before_atomic() barrier() +#define __smp_mb__after_atomic() barrier() + #include <asm-generic/barrier.h> #endif /* __ASM_BARRIER_H */
As per: lkml.kernel.org/r/20150921112252.3c2937e1@mschwide atomics imply a barrier on s390, so s390 should change smp_mb__before_atomic and smp_mb__after_atomic to barrier() instead of smp_mb() and hence should not use the generic versions. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Suggested-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> --- arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)