From patchwork Tue Mar 29 08:05:29 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shannon Zhao X-Patchwork-Id: 8683771 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-xen-devel@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.136]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B6489F3D1 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41FA2015A for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97B920149 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1akojT-00070N-VB; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:10:35 +0000 Received: from mail6.bemta6.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1akojS-00070G-Tp for xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:10:35 +0000 Received: from [85.158.143.35] by server-2.bemta-6.messagelabs.com id AF/7A-09532-A783AF65; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 08:10:34 +0000 X-Env-Sender: zhaoshenglong@huawei.com X-Msg-Ref: server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com!1459239031!6322205!1 X-Originating-IP: [119.145.14.66] X-SpamReason: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=sa_preprocessor: VHJ1c3RlZCBJUDogMTE5LjE0NS4xNC42NiA9PiA4NTI3\n X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 8.11; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 31885 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2016 08:10:33 -0000 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (HELO szxga03-in.huawei.com) (119.145.14.66) by server-5.tower-21.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Mar 2016 08:10:33 -0000 Received: from 172.24.1.48 (EHLO szxeml433-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.1.48]) by szxrg03-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.4.3-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BYW15336; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:05:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from HGHY1Z002260041.china.huawei.com (10.177.16.142) by szxeml433-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:05:44 +0800 From: Shannon Zhao To: , Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:05:29 +0800 Message-ID: <1459238729-11520-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.0.msysgit.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.16.142] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.56FA3764.00A2, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-05-26 15:14:31, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: ec2649d5b593d480f6fd029c7de9bbc9 Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, "open list:ACPI" , shannon.zhao@linaro.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, Len Brown Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v9 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xen.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Shannon Zhao ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0. CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" (supporter:ACPI) CC: Len Brown (supporter:ACPI) CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI) Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao --- v9: add the UART device address in printed message --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c index 5f28cf7..29f26fc 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(acpi_scan_handlers_list); DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock); LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list); static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock); +static u64 spcr_uart_addr; struct acpi_dep_data { struct list_head node; @@ -1453,6 +1454,42 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child, return 0; } +static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares, + void *context) +{ + struct resource *res = context; + + if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res)) + return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE; + + return AE_OK; +} + +static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle) +{ + acpi_status status; + struct resource res; + + /* Check if it should ignore the UART device */ + if (spcr_uart_addr != 0) { + if (!acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS)) + return false; + + status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS, + acpi_get_resource_memory, &res); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return false; + + if (res.start == spcr_uart_addr) { + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "The UART device @%pa in SPCR table will be hidden\n", + &res.start); + return true; + } + } + + return false; +} + static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type, unsigned long long *sta) { @@ -1466,6 +1503,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type, switch (acpi_type) { case ACPI_TYPE_ANY: /* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */ case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE: + if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle)) + return -ENODEV; + *type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE; status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta); if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) @@ -1916,9 +1956,24 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void) return result < 0 ? result : 0; } +static void __init acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(void) +{ + acpi_status status; + struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr; + + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0, + (struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr); + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) + spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address; + else + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n"); +} + int __init acpi_scan_init(void) { int result; + acpi_status status; + struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr; acpi_pci_root_init(); acpi_pci_link_init(); @@ -1934,6 +1989,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void) acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler); + /* + * If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART + * device in SPCR table. + */ + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0, + (struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr); + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) { + if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao)) + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported."); + + if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart) + acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(); + } + mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock); /* * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.